Key Points

Pakistan's Defence Minister Khawaja Asif has openly admitted that Islamabad is closer to Beijing than Washington. His comments come at an awkward time when Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif was meeting with US President Trump. Asif emphasized China's reliability as an arms supplier while criticizing the United States for abandoning Pakistan after past conflicts. This reveals Pakistan's difficult position of being caught between two superpowers while facing severe economic challenges.

Key Points: Khawaja Asif Admits Pakistan Closer to China Than US

  • Pakistan Defence Minister admits defense cooperation increasing with China due to US unreliability
  • Asif's comments contradict PM Sharif's White House meeting with President Trump
  • Pakistan faces economic crisis while caught between US-China rivalry
  • China investing heavily but Pakistan slipping into potential debt trap
4 min read

Is Khawaja Asif queering the pitch for Pakistan caught between the Eagle and Dragon?

Pakistan Defence Minister reveals strategic tilt toward Beijing over Washington amid economic crisis and US-China rivalry, creating diplomatic tensions.

"Strategic future can't be with both (the US and China) - Khawaja Asif"

New Delhi, Sep 30

Pakistan Defence Minister Khawaja Asif’s admission of Islamabad’s closer proximity to Beijing than Washington when the latter two “will always be at loggerheads” comes at a time when his leaders are trying to snuggle into the cosiness of the White House.

Led to a candid answer by British-American journalist Mehdi Hasan, the Minister admitted that “defence cooperation is increasing with China” because of “unreliability of other sources, like the US”.

This interview happened recently when he was in New York to participate in the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) session. Ironically, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, after his address at the UNGA, had a meeting with US President Donald Trump in Washington around the same time.

Going by Asif’s defence of his country's “hybrid model” of governance by political and military masters, both his bosses were present at the White House meeting on September 25. Sharif was accompanied by Gen Asim Munir in the 80-minute meeting, for which the duo had to wait for about 30 minutes while Trump was taking care of other engagements.

As the Defence Minister, Asif’s emphasis on Pakistan’s “time-tested relationship” with China since the 1950s, and Beijing being a very reliable provider of “arms and other things”, raises some pertinent questions.

As does his statement “strategic future can’t be with both (the US and China)”. Is Pakistan actually being “flirtatious” (a term he used during the interview) with the US, without any agenda? Or did White House summon his masters to bestow an unknown task?

In any case, while facing serious economic instability and revolts in tribal areas, Pakistan is also caught in a diplomatic crosswind rising from the escalating rivalry between the US and China.

Amidst increasing domestic concerns, the Sharif administration, like many of his predecessors, has sought a closer relationship with Washington, including in security. Simultaneously, it has also made renewed forays into partnership with China -- with which it shares a part of the border.

Given Asif’s earlier outburst against the “Western world” for doing their “dirty work” in the covert operation against the Soviet army then occupying Afghanistan, he may be exhibiting a shift towards China.

And while doing that, he has ignored the US support his country has received time and again. It includes the dispatch of the Seventh Fleet in 1971 during the Bangladesh war for liberation. However, that did not help Pakistan due to some quick military-diplomatic manoeuvres by India and the then USSR.

He has also ignored the fact that China has strongly reacted to the killing of its citizens assisting Pakistan in infrastructure development. Beijing has also given indications of withdrawing from financing a major road connectivity project.

In an earlier interview with another publication, too, Asif shared that his country had been abandoned by the US after the first Afghan War (the one against Soviet occupation), adding, “we were left high and dry”. “And the United States just went back and then again, just about three years back when the Taliban came to power in Afghanistan, again this situation [in which] we are taking the brunt, again, for what was there in Afghanistan,” he told his interviewer in 2023.

Pakistan’s economy is in a shambles, where the West has assisted in world aid organisations opening their purse strings. On the other hand, China has been investing heavily, leading to a situation where Islamabad is slipping into a debt trap.

As Asif said earlier, “All we have is a geographical location, which is strategic, which attracts, I would say, not all the good things; it sometimes attracts some things which really make us even more vulnerable.”

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
Interesting how they mention the 1971 war but conveniently forget how their own actions led to that situation. India handled it well with strategic partnerships. Pakistan should focus on fixing their economy instead of playing both sides.
A
Arjun K
China's debt trap diplomacy is well known. Pakistan is walking into it with eyes wide open. Their CPEC projects are already facing issues. Better they learn from Sri Lanka's experience. 🤔
S
Sarah B
While I understand the strategic concerns, I think we should be careful about how we discuss our neighbors. A stable Pakistan is better for regional peace. But their policy confusion is indeed concerning.
V
Vikram M
The minister admits they only have "geographical location" to offer. This shows how dependent they are on external powers. Meanwhile, India has built strong independent capabilities. Make in India is working! 💪
M
Michael C
Pakistan's military-diplomatic maneuvers have consistently failed them. From 1971 to Kargil to current economic crisis - same pattern. Hope they learn and focus on development rather than confrontation.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50