Key Points

A high-profile legal battle surrounding Union Minister Suresh Gopi's film has finally concluded with the Kerala High Court clearing its release. The film, originally titled "Janaki vs State of Kerala", faced certification challenges from the CBFC over its title and content. After multiple hearings and negotiations, the production team agreed to a slight title modification and minimal cuts. The court's decisive intervention has now paved the way for the film's theatrical release, generating significant public interest.

Key Points: Suresh Gopi's Janaki V Film Clears Kerala HC Legal Battle

  • Kerala HC resolves legal dispute over film's title
  • CBFC initially proposed 96 cuts, reduced to just two
  • Rajya Sabha MP Haris Beeran mediated film's production challenge
  • Justice defends film's creative choices during court hearings
2 min read

Kerala HC closes case, MoS Suresh Gopi's film to release tomorrow

Union Minister Suresh Gopi's controversial film wins court battle, set for release after CBFC certification and title modification

"She is not a rapist. If a rapist were named Rama, Krishna, or Janaki, then I could understand the concern. - Justice N. Nagaresh"

Kochi, July 16

After weeks of legal wrangling and uncertainty, Union Minister of State for Tourism and BJP leader Suresh Gopi's latest film, Janaki. V vs State of Kerala, on Wednesday, has finally been cleared for release by the Kerala High Court.

The court has said that the prime grievance of the petitioner now stands redressed.

The film will be released on Thursday.

On July 12, all the decks was cleared when the film received clearance from the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC).

The film, originally titled "Janaki vs State of Kerala", ran into trouble when the CBFC objected to the use of the name "Janaki" in the title, citing concerns under Section 5B(2) of the Cinematograph Act.

The production company challenged the decision in the Kerala High Court, initiating a legal battle that drew considerable public attention.

Following three rounds of hearings, the producers of the film, initially unwilling to change the title, agreed to a slight modification, renaming the film "Janaki. V vs State of Kerala" during the July 9 hearing.

The production team's counsel, Rajya Sabha MP Haris Beeran, said the compromise was a mutual decision after both parties opted for a softer approach.

Initially, the CBFC had proposed 96 cuts to the film, but after multiple rounds of discussion, that number was reduced to just two.

Additionally, two film dialogues were muted.

The re-edited version was resubmitted on Saturday, and the CBFC promptly granted certification to the film, which was initially slated for release on June 27.

During the July 2 hearing, Justice N. Nagaresh had remarked that the CBFC's objection to the name "Janaki" was unwarranted.

"She is not a rapist. If a rapist were named Rama, Krishna, or Janaki, then I could understand the concern. But here, she is the heroine, a survivor seeking justice," the judge observed, defending the creative choice.

With this the case has come to a close and now all eyes are on how the film will fare at the box office as more than adequate pre-publicity has already been received.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The CBFC needs to stop being so sensitive about names. Judge was absolutely right - names don't define character! This unnecessary delay cost producers so much money 💸
A
Arjun K
As someone from Kerala, I'm glad this got resolved. But why make such a fuss over just adding a 'V' to the title? Feels like bureaucracy winning over common sense 🤦‍♂️
S
Sarah B
Interesting case! I'm an NRI following this from Canada. The Indian film certification process seems more complicated than ours. Hope the movie's message about justice isn't diluted by all these cuts.
N
Nisha Z
From 96 cuts to just 2! Shows how unreasonable initial demands were. CBFC should have clear guidelines instead of making filmmakers run to courts. Our tax money wasted on unnecessary litigation 😤
V
Vikram M
While I'm happy about the release, I hope people judge the film on its merit and not just because a minister is acting in it. Let's keep art and politics separate.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50