BJP's Assam Election Shield: Why SIR Exclusion Raises Voter Rights Alarm

Abhishek Banerjee has raised serious questions about why Assam is being excluded from the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls. He alleges this is a deliberate BJP strategy to shield its own-ruled state while targeting opposition states. The TMC leader claims the real intention behind SIR is to delete genuine voters rather than clean the electoral rolls. He has threatened mass protests if voter names are wrongfully removed during this exercise.

Key Points: Abhishek Banerjee Questions BJP Keeping Assam Out of SIR Exercise

  • Banerjee questions why Assam excluded from SIR despite sharing borders and 2025 polls
  • TMC leader alleges BJP protecting its own-ruled state from scrutiny
  • Warns of protests at ECI headquarters if genuine voters get deleted
  • Links recent suicide case to panic created by NRC and electoral revision fears
  • Claims SIR exercise being rushed to delete opposition voters systematically
  • BJP refuses to respond, cites Election Commission's earlier clarification
3 min read

Keeping Assam out of SIR exercise BJP's ploy to shield its own-ruled state: Abhishek Banerjee

TMC's Abhishek Banerjee alleges BJP shielding Assam from electoral roll revision while targeting opposition states, warns of protests over voter deletions.

"Their aim is not to make the voters' list error-free. In reality, SIR stands for 'Silent Invisible Rigging' - Abhishek Banerjee"

Kolkata, Oct 28

Trinamool Congress general secretary and Lok Sabha MP Abhishek Banerjee on Tuesday questioned the rationale behind keeping Assam out of the purview of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, even though the northeastern state, like West Bengal, Tamil Nadu, and Kerala, is also scheduled to go to the polls next year.

"Assembly elections are scheduled next year in Assam as well, and that state also shares international borders. But why has Assam been kept out of the SIR's purview? It is clearly a ploy by the BJP to exclude a state governed by them from the revision exercise," Banerjee told mediapersons in Kolkata on Tuesday.

Reacting to the remark, the state BJP leadership said there was no need to respond to the Trinamool leader's comments, as Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar had already clarified on Monday the reasons for keeping Assam out of the SIR exercise.

Banerjee further alleged that while earlier, citizens used to elect the government, the current ruling party at the Centre was attempting to reverse the process "so that the government can choose its voters."

"Their aim is not to make the voters' list error-free. In reality, SIR stands for 'Silent Invisible Rigging'. The last time such a revision was carried out in West Bengal, it took almost two years to complete the exercise. Now, they are claiming it will be completed in just two months," he said.

The Trinamool Congress leader claimed that if the genuine objective was to prepare an error-free electoral roll, the revision should be conducted over an adequate period, not hastily. "The real intention is to delete the names of genuine voters from the list under the garb of revision," Banerjee alleged.

He also warned that if the names of genuine voters were deleted following the SIR exercise, the Trinamool Congress would launch protest demonstrations outside the Election Commission of India (ECI) headquarters in New Delhi.

Referring to the recent suicide of a 57-year-old man, identified as Pradeep Kar, at Panihati in North 24 Parganas district, reportedly out of fear of being affected by a possible National Register of Citizens (NRC) in West Bengal, Banerjee blamed the Union government and the ECI for creating panic among citizens.

"The Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar are responsible for this tragedy. FIRs should be registered against them. The BJP will have to pay for this," Banerjee said.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
The CEC has already given reasons for keeping Assam out. Why is TMC creating unnecessary controversy? Every state has different requirements for electoral roll revision.
A
Arjun K
Banerjee makes a valid point about the timing. Two months seems too rushed for such an important exercise. We need proper voter lists, not hurried ones that might exclude genuine voters.
S
Sarah B
The tragic suicide mentioned here is heartbreaking. Political parties should be more responsible with their statements and not create panic among citizens. 😢
V
Vikram M
As someone from Assam, I'm glad we're not part of this rushed exercise. Our electoral rolls were recently updated and don't need another revision. Sometimes exclusion is better than unnecessary inclusion.
M
Michael C
While I understand the concerns about Assam's exclusion, blaming individuals for a suicide seems excessive. Let's focus on the electoral process rather than personal accusations.
A
Ananya R
The "Silent Invisible Rigging" comment is quite clever! 😄 But seriously, we need to ensure our democracy remains strong with fair electoral processes that don't favor any party.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50