Nadda Reveals Nehru's Vande Mataram Reservations in Rajya Sabha Clash

JP Nadda stirred up the Rajya Sabha by revisiting the Constituent Assembly's old debates. He read from Nehru's letters, which expressed doubts about using Vande Mataram as the national anthem abroad. This led to a sharp back-and-forth with the opposition about the song's significance. The discussion highlighted the ongoing political tussle over national symbols and history.

Key Points: JP Nadda Cites Nehru's Vande Mataram Stance in Rajya Sabha

  • Nadda quoted archival letters showing Nehru's concerns over Vande Mataram's orchestral suitability
  • He argued the Constituent Assembly did not give Vande Mataram equal consideration as Jana Gana Mana
  • The debate sparked a charged exchange with Opposition Leader Mallikarjun Kharge
  • Nadda accused the Congress of historically compromising on Indian culture and ethos
3 min read

JP Nadda recalls Nehru's reservations on Vande Mataram in Rajya Sabha debate

BJP's JP Nadda quotes Nehru's letters in Rajya Sabha, revealing why Vande Mataram was not chosen as the national anthem, sparking a heated political debate.

"Nehru himself wrote that Vande Mataram was not suitable for orchestral arrangement, especially in foreign countries. - JP Nadda"

New Delhi, Dec 11

Leader of the House in Rajya Sabha, J.P. Nadda, on Thursday revisited the Constituent Assembly's deliberations on the national anthem, drawing a sharp distinction between the treatment accorded to Jana Gana Mana and Vande Mataram.

Speaking during the ongoing debate on Vande Mataram, Nadda said that while the Assembly had set aside time to discuss and finalise Jana Gana Mana as the anthem, requests to extend similar consideration to Vande Mataram were not accepted.

Nadda argued that this reflected the reservations of the country's first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, who, according to archival records, did not regard Vande Mataram as a feasible choice for the anthem.

Quoting from Nehru's letters, Nadda said the Congress leader believed the song was not suitable for orchestral arrangement, particularly in foreign settings where India's anthem would be performed.

Reading from one such letter, Nadda underlined Nehru's view that the composition, though emotionally stirring, carried linguistic and stylistic complexities that made it difficult to adapt for formal occasions abroad.

"Nehru himself wrote that Vande Mataram was not suitable for orchestral arrangement, especially in foreign countries," Nadda told the House, adding that this was a decisive factor in the Constituent Assembly's choice.

In a charged exchange in the Rajya Sabha, Leader of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge asked whether the debate was truly about Vande Mataram or merely about Jawaharlal Nehru.

Responding sharply, Leader of House Nadda accused the Congress of having compromised "since the beginning" on the culture, ethos and thought process of Bharat. He asserted that the invocation of Maa Bharti or Bharat Mata was not a partisan slogan belonging to the Jan Sangh, RSS or BJP, but a civilisational expression rooted in thousands of years of Indian history.

Nadda stressed that the phrase embodies the collective spirit of Indian culture, transcending political boundaries and reflecting the nation's deep cultural heritage.

His remarks sought to frame Bharat Mata as a timeless symbol of identity and reverence, contrasting it with what he described as Congress' reluctance to embrace cultural traditions. The exchange underscored the ideological divide over national symbols and their interpretation in modern politics.

By invoking Nehru's words, Nadda sought to highlight what he described as a deliberate sidelining of Vande Mataram despite its role in inspiring generations during the freedom struggle.

The remarks sparked animated exchanges in the House, with members from the Treasury benches insisting that the song deserved greater recognition, while opposition members accused the government of selectively quoting history to score political points.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Why are we still debating this? Both Jana Gana Mana and Vande Mataram are beautiful and important. One is our anthem, the other is our national song. Can't we just appreciate our heritage without turning everything into a political fight? 🙏
R
Rohit P
Nadda ji has a point. The sentiment of "Maa Bharti" is ingrained in our civilization. It's not about politics, it's about identity. When I hear Vande Mataram, I feel a connection to the soil of India that goes beyond any government or party.
M
Michael C
As an observer, I find this fascinating. The founding fathers made a practical choice for an anthem that would work internationally. Revisiting these debates 75 years later seems more about current politics than historical accuracy.
S
Shreya B
With respect, I think Kharge's question was valid. Is this really about honoring Vande Mataram, or just another opportunity to criticize Nehru and the Congress? Our leaders should focus on present issues rather than constantly refighting old battles.
K
Karthik V
The emotional power of Vande Mataram is undeniable. Every time it's sung in my daughter's school assembly, you can see the pride in the children's eyes. That's what matters - not some 70-year-old letter about orchestra arrangements. Jai Hind!

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50