Key Points

Five Naga tribes under CoRRP will boycott government events, including Independence Day, over dissatisfaction with Nagaland’s job quota review process. They oppose the inclusion of civil society groups in the newly formed commission, demanding an impartial panel. The reservation policy, unchanged since 1977, disproportionately affects backward tribes despite evolving socio-economic conditions. Protests have escalated with rallies and mass demonstrations across the state.

Key Points: Naga Tribes Boycott Nagaland Govt Events Over Job Quota Dispute

  • CoRRP rejects Nagaland cabinet’s 7-member Job Reservation Commission
  • Protesting tribes demand impartial officials-only review panel
  • Reservation policy unchanged since 1977 despite socio-economic shifts
  • Demonstrations held in May and July to push for reforms
3 min read

Job quotas: Naga body to boycott govt events, including I-Day celebrations

Five Naga tribes boycott state functions, including Independence Day, demanding impartial review of job reservation policy amid ongoing protests.

"The inclusion of three Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) compromises their independence and overall impartiality. – Tesinlo Semy, CoRRP Convener"

Kohima, Aug 9

The five Tribes Committee on Review of Reservation Policy (CoRRP), which has been agitating in Nagaland for the past several months demanding a review of the state's job reservation policy, on Saturday announced that it would boycott all state government functions, including the forthcoming Independence Day celebrations in the state.

The CoRRP, comprising five backward Naga tribes, earlier on August 7 rejected the state cabinet decision to constitute a 7-member Job Reservation Commission (JRC).

A Nagaland government statement on August 6 said that the state cabinet, in its meeting, chaired by Chief Minister Neiphiu Rio, on Wednesday, has approved the constitution of a 7-member JRC, which would be headed by a person with integrity and administrative experience from retired senior IAS officers of the Nagaland cadre. The Commission would include one member each from the Eastern Nagaland Peoples' Organisation (ENPO), the Central Nagaland Tribes Council (CNTC), and the Tenyimi Union Nagaland (TUN) and three official members -- the administrative head of the Political and Administrative Reforms Department, the Home Commissioner, and the administrative head of Law and Justice Department.

Criticising the Nagaland cabinet's decision, the CoRRP leaders on Saturday reiterated that JRC is a "repetition" of the June 12 resolution of the state government that failed to address the committee’s core demands regarding the Backwards Tribe (BT) reservation issue. The CoRRP announced its decision after a marathon closed-door meeting held in Kohima between the Five-Tribes Committee and the apex bodies of five Naga tribes -- Angami, Ao, Lotha, Rengma and Sema tribes.

After the meeting, CoRRP convener Tesinlo Semy said that while they acknowledge the government's decision to set up the JRC to review the reservation policy, they strongly oppose the composition of the commission. “The inclusion of three Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) compromises their independence and overall impartiality,” he told the media. He said the CoRRP wants a commission composed completely of in-service or retired government officials for an impartial review of the reservation in government jobs.

CoRRP member secretary G.K. Zhimomi said that they never demanded JRC, but it was the result of a June 3 meeting with the state government, led by Deputy Chief Minister Yanthungo Patton. “The commission must be independent and impartial,” he said.

The push for a review of Nagaland’s job reservation policy intensified after the five tribal apex bodies under the banner of CoRRP submitted a joint memorandum to the state government recently. The Naga body claimed that the job reservation policy, which has been in place for the past 48 years (since 1977), no longer reflects the current socio-economic and educational realities of the various communities in Nagaland.

In support of their demand, the Naga bodies organised two phases of agitation – first on May 29 in the form of protest rallies across multiple district headquarters and in the second phase on July 9, thousands of people from the five Naga tribes attired in traditional dresses staged a protest outside the Civil Secretariat.

Primarily, 25 per cent reservation was allocated for seven tribes in non-technical and non-gazetted posts for 10 years. These tribes were designated as ‘backward’ based on educational and economic disadvantages, and limited representation in state services. Over the years, the reservation has increased to 37 per cent, comprising 25 per cent for seven Eastern Nagaland backward tribes and 12 per cent for four other backward tribes of the state.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
As someone from Northeast India, I understand the frustration. But we must find solutions through dialogue, not protests. The government should involve all stakeholders properly - this half-hearted commission won't solve anything.
A
Aman W
Reservation policies across India need complete overhaul. They've become political tools rather than empowerment measures. Nagaland's case shows how outdated systems create unrest. #TimeForChange
S
Sarah B
Interesting to see how tribal dynamics play out in policy matters. The demand for an impartial commission makes sense - you can't have CSOs judging their own cases. Hope they find middle ground soon.
N
Nikhil C
While I support their cause, boycotting Independence Day celebrations sends wrong message. Our freedom fighters didn't sacrifice for this. There are better ways to protest - gherao ministers' offices or hunger strikes maybe?
K
Kavya N
The real issue is lack of job creation in Northeast. Instead of fighting over limited govt jobs, state should focus on attracting industries and creating private sector opportunities. Reservation debate is just symptom of bigger problem.
V
Vikram M
Respectfully disagree with CoRRP's approach. If they've been given a commission after protests, they should engage with process instead of rejecting it outright. Perfect

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50