Why job losers are insisting on publication of 'segregated' lists: CM Mamata

IANS April 22, 2025 408 views

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has challenged job seekers protesting over the publication of segregated candidate lists following a Supreme Court ruling. The apex court cancelled the entire 2016 WBSSC recruitment panel of 25,753 teaching and non-teaching positions. Mamata criticized the protesters, questioning the purpose of segregated lists and suggesting the matter should be handled by the government and court. The controversy stems from allegations of job appointments being made through corrupt practices.

"Why are you getting trapped in provocation? There is no requirement for the lists." - Mamata Banerjee, West Bengal CM
Kolkata, April 22: West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Tuesday afternoon questioned why teaching and non-teaching staff in the state-run schools, who lost jobs following a Supreme Court order, were now insisting on the publication of the lists segregating the "genuine" and "tainted" candidates.

Key Points

1

Supreme Court upholds cancellation of entire WBSSC 2016 job panel

2

Mamata questions purpose of segregated candidate lists

3

Protests continue outside WBSSC office in Kolkata

4

State government assures publication of 'genuine' candidates list

She raised this question while speaking at an administrative review meeting at Midnapore in the West Midnapore district.

While she raised this question, candidates were protesting outside the WBSSC office at Salt Lake in Kolkata.

"Why are you sitting amid this extreme heat? What purpose will the segregated lists of 'genuine' and 'tainted' candidates serve for you?" the Chief Minister questioned.

She also said: "It is for the state government and the court to consider who is 'genuine' and who is not."

"What do you all have to do with the list? Why are you getting trapped in provocation? There is no requirement for the lists," the Chief Minister said.

Speaking on the occasion, the Chief Minister said that some people in the state always "conspired" to ensure the termination of jobs by moving to court.

"They do not have any work, other than moving to the court and filing public interest litigations. We are providing jobs, and they are trying to terminate those jobs. There should always be a human face in politics," the Chief Minister said.

Earlier this month, the Supreme Court upheld the order of the Calcutta High Court's division bench of Justice Debangsu Basak and Justice Shabbar Rashidi last year, cancelling WBSSC's entire panel for 2016 of 25,753 teaching and non-teaching jobs.

The Apex Court also accepted the Calcutta High Court's observation that the entire panel had to be cancelled because of the state government and WBSSC's failure to segregate the "genuine" candidates from the "tainted" ones, who got jobs paying money.

Thereafter, at a meeting of a delegation of "genuine" candidates with state Education Minister Bratya Basu, the state government assured the publication of the "segregated" list.

Reader Comments

P
Priya M.
Transparency is key in such matters. If there are genuine candidates who lost their jobs due to others' wrongdoings, they deserve to know where they stand. The government should publish the lists without further delay.
R
Rahul K.
I understand the CM's point about the heat, but people are protesting for their livelihoods here! 😓 This isn't about provocation - it's about justice for those who played by the rules.
S
Sneha P.
While I generally support Mamata Banerjee, I respectfully disagree on this one. The segregated lists would actually help restore faith in the system. People have a right to know if they were among the "genuine" candidates.
A
Arjun D.
The court has spoken - the government failed to separate genuine from tainted candidates. Now they must make amends. Simple as that. 🤷‍♂️
N
Neha T.
This is heartbreaking for all the honest candidates who worked hard for these positions. The government should focus on re-employing the genuine candidates first before anything else.
V
Vikram S.
Interesting how the narrative has shifted from "all appointments were clean" to now talking about "genuine vs tainted" candidates. The lists would help clear the air once and for all.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Your email won't be published


Disclaimer: Comments here reflect the author's views alone. Insulting or using offensive language against individuals, communities, religion, or the nation is illegal.

Tags:
You May Like!