Jharkhand HC Clears Path: JSSC-CGL Results to be Released After CBI Probe Rejected

The Jharkhand High Court has finally given its verdict on the controversial JSSC-CGL exam. It dismissed a petition that was demanding a CBI probe into alleged paper leaks. This means the long-delayed results can now be officially published. Thousands of candidates waiting for government jobs will finally get some clarity.

Key Points: Jharkhand HC Rejects CBI Probe Plea, Orders JSSC-CGL Results Release

  • High Court dismisses PIL seeking CBI investigation into alleged exam paper leak
  • State CID found no substantial evidence to support leak claims
  • Exam was held for over 2,000 government posts with 3 lakh candidates
  • Court lifts interim stay, bringing relief to lakhs of waiting aspirants
2 min read

Jharkhand HC rejects plea for CBI probe into JSSC-CGL 'paper leak', orders release of results

Jharkhand High Court dismisses petition for CBI probe into alleged JSSC-CGL paper leak, directs commission to publish long-delayed results immediately.

"The court directed the Commission to publish the pending results without further delay. - Court Order"

Ranchi, Dec 3

The Jharkhand High Court on Wednesday dismissed a petition seeking a CBI investigation into the alleged paper leak in the Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission’s Combined Graduate Level (JSSC-CGL) examination.

This has now cleared the way for the long-delayed results to be published.

A division bench of Chief Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan and Justice Rajesh Shankar pronounced the verdict on Wednesday, nearly a month after they reserved judgment on November 3.

The court directed the Commission to publish the pending results without further delay.

During previous hearings, Advocate General Rajiv Ranjan and Advocate Piyush Chitresh represented the state government, while Advocate Sanjay Piparwal appeared for the JSSC.

Senior Supreme Court advocate Ajit Kumar Sinha and senior High Court advocate Ajit Kumar represented the petitioners.

The highly competitive JSSC-CGL examination -- conducted for recruitment to more than 2,000 state government posts -- was held on September 21 and 22, 2024, across 823 examination centres. Out of 3,04,769 candidates who appeared, the Commission shortlisted 2,145 candidates on December 5, 2024.

However, the declaration of results was halted after Rajesh Kumar and others filed a public interest litigation (PIL) demanding a CBI probe, alleging the exam had been compromised through leaked question papers.

Taking note of the allegations, the High Court imposed an interim stay on the release of results on December 17, 2024.

After several hearings, the state government informed the bench that the Crime Investigation Department (CID) had found no substantial evidence to support claims of a paper leak. Counsel for the Commission also denied any breach in the examination process.

The petitioners, meanwhile, insisted on the need for a central agency probe, citing similarities in question papers, purported videos from outside examination centres, and other circumstantial material.

The court judgement of rejection of the CBI probe and the order of publication of results has brought relief to lakhs of aspirants who have been waiting for the next phase of recruitment.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
While I'm happy for the candidates, I hope this doesn't mean the allegations are being brushed under the carpet. Paper leaks are a serious issue in India. The court should have at least ordered a transparent review of the CID's findings.
R
Rohit P
As someone who gave this exam, the last few months have been pure torture. Constant anxiety. Thank you, Jharkhand HC, for ending this uncertainty. Now JSSC, please don't delay any further. We have already wasted enough time.
P
Priya S
This is a relief, but it sets a worrying precedent. If every exam where someone cries "paper leak" gets stalled for months, our entire recruitment system will collapse. We need faster mechanisms to verify such claims.
V
Vikram M
The petitioners had a point about demanding a CBI probe. State CID investigations often lack credibility in the public eye. A central agency probe would have settled the matter for good and restored full faith in the process. This feels like a missed opportunity.
K
Kavya N
Good decision! My brother was one of the candidates. His whole family was stressed. These PILs sometimes do more harm than good. Now JSSC, please release the merit list quickly. All the best to all the aspirants! 👍

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50