Key Points

Rohan Jaitley strongly refuted Rahul Gandhi's claim that his late father Arun Jaitley had threatened him over farm laws. He pointed out the timeline discrepancy, as the laws were passed after Arun Jaitley's death. Rohan emphasized his father's commitment to democratic values and respectful dialogue. He also criticized Gandhi's pattern of making allegations against deceased leaders.

Key Points: Rohan Jaitley Slams Rahul Gandhi Over False Arun Jaitley Farm Law Claims

  • Rohan Jaitley denies Rahul Gandhi's claim about Arun Jaitley threatening him
  • Says farm laws passed after his father's 2019 demise
  • Calls Gandhi's remarks disrespectful to deceased leaders
  • Questions pattern of targeting late politicians
2 min read

'Irresponsible statements must be held accountable sooner or later': Rohan Jaitley on Rahul Gandhi's remarks on his father

Arun Jaitley's son Rohan rebukes Rahul Gandhi for "false" farm law allegations, calling them disrespectful to his late father's legacy.

"Irresponsible statements must be held accountable sooner or later – Rohan Jaitley"

New Delhi, Aug 2

Hours after Leader of the Opposition (LoP) Rahul Gandhi claimed that the late Arun Jaitley had "threatened him" over the contentious farm laws, Rohan Jaitley, son of the former Union Minister, strongly rebutted the allegation, calling it completely false and an attempt to malign the legacy of a statesman who cannot defend himself.

Speaking to IANS in New Delhi, Rohan Jaitley expressed shock and disappointment over Rahul Gandhi's remarks.

“The farm laws that Rahul Gandhi is referring to were passed in 2020, more than a year after my father's demise in August 2019. My father had been unwell for several months before his death. So, the question of him threatening anyone on this issue simply does not arise,” he said.

Rohan emphasised that his father was known for his deep faith in democratic values and civil discourse.

“Threatening someone was not in his nature. He believed in respectful dialogue, even with opposing views. He was a pillar of healthy democracy,” he said, adding that it is both inappropriate and disrespectful to make allegations against someone who is no longer alive to respond.

He also pointed out that this is not the first time Rahul Gandhi has made questionable remarks about deceased leaders. “Earlier, he made similar comments about the late Manohar Parrikar. This pattern of targeting leaders who are no longer here to defend themselves is disturbing, especially from someone who holds a constitutional position.”

When asked if the family would take legal action, Rohan said, “We will make a decision with time. Irresponsible statements must be held accountable sooner or later.”

He further said that Rahul Gandhi owes an apology.

On being asked if he believes Gandhi is suffering from an inferiority complex or indulging in attention-seeking behaviour, Rohan simply said, “That is for him to explain.”

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As someone who follows Indian politics closely, I find this pattern of targeting deceased leaders very disturbing. There should be basic decency in political discourse. Rohan Jaitley handled this with remarkable restraint.
P
Priya S
The timing is suspicious too! Just when farmers' protests are gaining momentum again, such statements emerge. Is this just political opportunism? 🤔
R
Rohit P
While I don't support BJP, I must say Rahul Gandhi needs to be more careful with his words. Making allegations against those who can't defend themselves is not how opposition should function. We need constructive criticism, not personal attacks.
K
Kavya N
Emotional moment for Rohan Jaitley - defending his father's legacy. Arun Jaitley ji was indeed a gentleman politician. This incident shows how low our political discourse has fallen. Shame!
M
Michael C
The facts presented by Rohan Jaitley are indisputable - the timeline clearly contradicts Rahul Gandhi's claims. In any democracy, leaders should be held accountable for spreading misinformation.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50