Key Points

India has formally notified the WTO of its intent to retaliate against US steel and aluminium tariffs, marking a stronger trade defense stance. The move aligns with India's Make in India strategy and follows US failure to conduct mandatory WTO consultations. GTRI warns this could deepen trade tensions if unresolved by June 2025. This mirrors India's 2019 retaliation which was later withdrawn after diplomatic talks.

Key Points: India Challenges US Steel Tariffs at WTO to Protect Make in India

  • India invokes WTO rights to retaliate against US safeguard duties
  • Aligns with Make in India industrial strategy
  • US failed to conduct mandatory WTO consultations
  • Retaliatory tariffs may take effect by June 2025
3 min read

India's stance against US at WTO signals a tougher stance in steel and aluminium, align with Make in India strategy: GTRI

India moves WTO against US steel and aluminium tariffs, signaling a tougher trade stance to defend domestic industries under Make in India.

"The move signals a tougher Indian stance, especially in politically sensitive sectors like steel and aluminium - GTRI"

New Delhi, May 13

India's tougher stance at the World Trade Organization (WTO) shows its growing resolve to defend domestic industries, especially in politically sensitive sectors like steel and aluminium, says Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) on Tuesday after India's moving WTO for retaliatory tariff against US.

GTRI said "The move also signals a tougher Indian stance, especially in politically sensitive sectors like steel and aluminium that align with its "Make in India" industrial strategy".

It also noted that this move aligns with its "Make in India" industrial strategy and marks a significant step in its trade policy.

In a significant move on Monday targeting U.S. safeguard duties on steel, aluminium, and their related products, India has formally notified the WTO of its intention to suspend trade concessions granted to the United States.

The notice, issued on 12 May 2025 under document G/SG/N/12/IND/5, invokes India's rights under Article 12.5 of the WTO Agreement on Safeguards. This provision allows a country to retaliate when another member imposes safeguard measures without proper notification or consultations.

At the centre of the dispute are the U.S. safeguard tariffs on steel, aluminium, and derivative products. These duties were first introduced in 2018 on national security grounds and have been extended several times.

The latest extension came through U.S. Presidential Proclamations 10895 and 10896, issued on 10 February 2025 and effective from 12 March 2025.

India argues that these U.S. actions, although never formally notified as safeguard measures, act as such and breach WTO rules under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 and the Safeguards Agreement.

Importantly, the U.S. failed to conduct the mandatory consultations under Article 12.3 of the Safeguards Agreement, prompting India to respond through retaliation

GTRI also added that Unless the U.S. initiates consultations or withdraws the measures, India's retaliatory tariffs may come into effect 30 days after the notification date--on 8 June 2025.

India has also kept the option open to revise the list of targeted products and adjust tariff rates, ensuring a proportional economic response.

This demonstrates India's intention to use the WTO platform firmly to protect its trade interests.

This is not the first time India has taken such a step. In June 2019, it imposed higher tariffs on 28 U.S. products--including almonds, apples, and chemicals--after the U.S. removed India from its Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) and continued with the steel and aluminium tariffs.

That retaliation, valued at about USD 240 million in trade, marked India's first use of WTO-sanctioned measures. These duties were later withdrawn in September 2023, following Prime Minister Narendra Modi's state visit to Washington, where both countries agreed to resolve six WTO disputes, including this one.

GTRI highlighted that now, much depends on how the U.S. responds.

It said "If the U.S. engages in consultations or withdraws the contested measures, a resolution may be reached. Otherwise, India's tariff response could take effect in early June, potentially affecting U.S. exporters and deepening trade frictions".

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

Here are 6 diverse Indian perspective comments for the article:
R
Rajesh K.
Finally some spine shown at WTO! US has been bullying developing nations for too long with unfair trade practices. Make in India needs protectionist measures in initial phases - just like China did in its growth story. 🇮🇳
P
Priya M.
While I support protecting domestic industries, we must be careful not to invite more trade barriers against our IT and pharma exports. Strategic balancing is needed. Maybe targeted retaliation rather than broad tariffs?
A
Arjun S.
Steel and aluminium sectors employ lakhs of workers. If US can cite 'national security' for protectionism, why can't India? Hope this leads to more investments in domestic manufacturing. Jai Hind!
S
Sunita R.
Good move but Indian steel industry needs to improve quality too. Can't just rely on govt protection forever. I work in auto sector - we often import specialty steel because local quality isn't consistent.
V
Vikram J.
Remember when US stopped our mango exports citing fruit flies? They always find excuses to block developing nations. Time to play hardball. But hope our diplomats handle this carefully - don't want full trade war.
N
Neha P.
As someone from Odisha where many steel plants are located, this is welcome news. But government should ensure benefits reach workers, not just corporate profits. More focus on skill development needed alongside protectionism.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50