Key Points

Experts warn that US tariffs on Indian imports could damage long-standing trust between the two nations. India's energy choices, like buying Russian oil, stem from market needs rather than political alignment. The UK's recent FTA with India highlights how cooperation, not coercion, fosters economic growth. Analysts suggest the tariffs may push India closer to China, undermining US strategic interests in the Indo-Pacific.

Key Points: Experts Warn US Tariff Gamble Risks Pushing India Closer to China

  • US tariffs risk decades of trust with India
  • India's Russian oil imports driven by market realities
  • UK's FTA shows constructive engagement works
  • S&P says tariffs won't severely impact India's economy
3 min read

India should be treated as a partner, not rival: Experts warn against US tariff gamble

Analysts caution that Trump's 50% tariffs on Indian imports could backfire, undermining US-India ties and benefiting China.

"India is not an economic rival but a strategic partner, crucial to America’s Indo-Pacific strategy. – AIIA Report"

New Delhi, Aug 18

As President Donald Trump prepares to impose 50 per cent tariffs on Indian imports from August 27, foreign policy experts have cautioned that treating India as a trade adversary could backfire on the United States.

A new report by the Australian Institute of International Affairs (AIIA) argues that coercive measures risk undermining decades of trust built between Washington and New Delhi, while also pushing India closer to China.

The US move comes after Trump announced on July 30 an additional 25 per cent penalty on Indian imports, on top of an existing 25 per cent duty, citing India’s purchase of Russian oil.

But analysts note that India’s energy decisions are dictated by market realities. With traditional suppliers redirecting crude to Europe, India turned to discounted Russian oil to secure affordable energy for its 1.4 billion people.

As India’s Ministry of External Affairs has said, the imports are meant to ensure “predictable and affordable energy costs.”

The AIIA report stresses that India is not an economic rival but a strategic partner, crucial to America’s Indo-Pacific strategy.

Over the past two decades, ties between the two nations have strengthened through milestones such as the 2008 civil nuclear deal and expanding defence cooperation.

In 2024, bilateral trade in goods reached $129 billion, with a shared goal of scaling it up to $500 billion by 2030.

India’s role in the Quad and its cooperation in counterterrorism make it indispensable to the US, the report notes.

By contrast, the United Kingdom’s approach is highlighted as an example of constructive engagement.

On July 24, India and the UK signed a landmark Free Trade Agreement (FTA) after three years of negotiations.

The deal eliminates tariffs on 99 per cent of Indian exports, lowers duties on British goods like whisky and cars, and improves professional mobility.

With trade expected to double to $120 billion by 2030, the FTA shows that respecting India’s priorities -- such as safeguarding its agriculture and MSME sectors -- can deliver prosperity without confrontation.

While the tariffs have raised geopolitical concerns, rating agency S&P Global Ratings has downplayed their economic impact.

Speaking at a webinar on Asia-Pacific Sovereign Ratings on August 13, S&P Director YeeFarn Phua said India would not be hit hard because it is “not a trade-driven economy.”

Exports to the US account for only 2 per cent of India’s GDP, and major export categories like pharmaceuticals and consumer electronics are exempt from the new duties.

“Over the longer term, we don’t think this will be a big hit on India’s economy, and therefore, the positive outlook on India remains,” Phua said last week.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The UK FTA shows how mature partners negotiate. Why can't America see that bullying tactics won't work with India? We're a proud nation that stands by its decisions.
A
Aman W
While I support India's stance, our government should also be more proactive in diversifying trade partners. Over-reliance on any single country is risky in the long run.
S
Sarah B
As an American living in Delhi, I'm embarrassed by my government's approach. The Quad partnership is too valuable to jeopardize over short-term trade disputes. Hope wiser heads prevail in Washington.
K
Karthik V
Good that S&P has clarified the limited economic impact. But geopolitics is more important here - US is pushing India towards BRICS with these actions. Very short-sighted!
N
Nisha Z
The civil nuclear deal shows what's possible when both countries work together. Instead of tariffs, focus should be on more such win-win collaborations. Make in India + American tech could be game-changing!
D
David E
Interesting to see the UK-India FTA as contrast. Maybe the special relationship Britain claims with US should include advising them on how to deal with emerging powers respectfully.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50