Key Points

An experienced American journalist believes India occupies a special position in global diplomacy. Terril Jones notes that while the US struggles to negotiate with both sides effectively, India maintains communication channels with both Russia and Ukraine. He suggests Prime Minister Modi could potentially broker a ceasefire that has eluded other world powers. This unique positioning could make India the unexpected peacemaker in the ongoing conflict.

Key Points: India Can Mediate Russia Ukraine Conflict Says Terril Jones

  • India holds unique diplomatic access to both Russian and Ukrainian leadership
  • US negotiations with Putin have proven difficult due to his stubborn nature
  • Modi could potentially broker a historic Russia-Ukraine ceasefire
  • Trump's business-style diplomacy failed in Alaska summit with Putin
  • High-level summits require extensive lower-level negotiations first
  • India's neutral position gives it unprecedented mediation leverage
3 min read

India can talk to both Russia and Ukraine, Washington cannot: Terril Jones

American professor Terril Jones says India holds unique diplomatic leverage with both Russia and Ukraine that the US lacks, potentially enabling Modi to broker a ceasefire.

"India is in a position where it can speak to both and get the ear of both leaders - Terril Jones"

New Delhi, September 6

Terril Jones, a leading American professor and a journalist close to 40 years, highlighted how India is in a unique position to bring to an end the Russia-Ukraine conflict, despite the United States' repeated attempts at getting the two parties to terms.

In a conversation with ANI, Terril Jones said that while the United States has been able to maintain communication with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the dialogue has not been ideal. He also noted that Russian President Vladimir Putin "can be very stubborn," and highlighted the potential role India could play in helping to secure a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine.

"The United States can talk to Zelenskyy, although obviously it has sometimes been acrimonious, and they can talk to Putin, but Putin can be very stubborn and maybe nothing will come out of these things. And so, you know, India is in a position where it can speak to both and get the ear of both leaders, in a way that other major countries can't.... so when you have a large country that can play the role of a mediator, then that may be a logical way to go", he said.

"I don't have a sense that Prime Minister Modi or the Indian government wants to emphasise that, but that also could be some leverage. And, you know, wouldn't it be rather amazing if Prime Minister Modi was the one who was able to negotiate a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine? And he's the one who wins the Nobel Peace Prize", Jones said.

Furthermore, when asked about the meeting between the US and Russia and whether US President Trump had overpromised the Alaska summit, and about his mission for peace, Jones said that Trump had expected more.

"He thought he could get some kind of resolution or at least commitment from Vladimir Putin just by sitting down with him because that's how he has sort of carried out his career," Jones said.

He highlighted how, as a businessman, Trump thought that negotiating with people by meeting them face-to-face would work things out and bring about a result.

"That works more in business than it does in politics, especially when there's so much at stake, such as a war over an entire country", Jones said and highlighted Trump's past meetings with North Korea's Kim Jong Un.

"Three meetings with him; there were over expectations and in the end, nothing really came from those. So, he's not a politician or has diplomatic experience. He doesn't see how things are traditionally done with very long negotiations at a lower level until there is actually a result that the top levels can meet and agree upon," he said.

Elaborating further, he gave the examples of summits like G7 and any bilateral saying, "The two leaders don't come with notebooks of we're going to negotiate about this. They come with issues that people and responsible individuals have already negotiated at lower levels. So yeah, I think Alaska was a disappointment to him and to Americans also."

Terril Jones has been a journalist for nearly 40 years, with 18 years spent overseas in Japan, China, and France, and the rest of the time in the United States, including at the United Nations in New York, Detroit for the auto industry, and Silicon Valley for covering technology. He is presently teaching international journalism.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
While I appreciate the sentiment, I'm not sure if India should get involved in this conflict. We have our own challenges to focus on, and getting between Russia and the West could backfire.
A
Arjun K
India's non-aligned foreign policy is finally paying off! This is why maintaining relationships with all sides is important. Hope our diplomats consider this opportunity seriously.
M
Michael C
As an American living in India, I find this perspective refreshing. The US approach hasn't worked, and maybe a different diplomatic approach from a neutral country like India could break the deadlock.
S
Shreya B
Nobel Peace Prize for PM Modi? That would be amazing for India's global image! But we should be careful - mediation requires delicate handling and both sides must genuinely want peace.
V
Vikram M
The professor is right about Trump's approach. Business negotiation tactics don't work in complex geopolitical conflicts. India's diplomatic corps understands this better having dealt with multiple power centers for decades.
K
Kavya N
Interesting perspective, but let's not forget India's primary responsibility is to protect Indian interests first. Any mediation effort should not compromise our strategic relationships or national security.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50