India is not a football which you kick around, it is an ally which you strive to embrace: Ex-Pentagon official Michael Rubin on India-Canada ties

ANI June 11, 2025 320 views

Michael Rubin, a former Pentagon official, criticized Justin Trudeau’s handling of India-Canada ties, calling it immature and politically driven. He praised new Canadian PM Mark Carney for taking a more constructive approach to rebuilding relations. Rubin urged Canada to crack down on Khalistani extremism, labeling it a terror threat. He also commended PM Modi for engaging diplomatically, signaling India’s willingness to move past Trudeau-era tensions.

"India is not a football which you kick around. It is an ally to be embraced." – Michael Rubin
Washington, DC, June 10: Former Pentagon official and senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, Michael Rubin, said that Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney is showing a more serious and constructive approach than his predecessor Justin Trudeau regarding the future of the India-Canada relationship.

Key Points

1

Rubin contrasts Trudeau’s failed India policy with Carney’s diplomatic maturity

2

Calls for Canada to designate Khalistani extremists as terrorists

3

Praises Modi’s strategic diplomacy and G7 Summit attendance

4

Warns Canada against tolerating terror-linked Khalistani groups

"India is not a football which you kick around. It is an ally to be embraced", Rubin remarked, underscoring the need for Canada to demonstrate sincerity and maturity in rebuilding ties with India.

"Mark Carney is working on repairing the relationship rather than following Justin Trudeau down the rabbit hole already shows that Prime Minister Carney is a much more serious person than the former Prime Minister of Canada...Canada now needs to demonstrate its good faith. India is not a football which you kick around. India is an ally which you strive to embrace," Rubin said.

Commenting further on bilateral ties, Rubin criticised the previous Canadian leadership's posture towards India. "Canada's relationship with India, especially under Justin Trudeau, was not principled. It was all virtue signalling and politics. The fact of the matter is that India is crucial to Canada, and Canada needs to decide whether ultimately it's going to side with the democracies like India and the United States, or whether it's going to posture the way Justin Trudeau did and allow China, which also has significant interests in Canada," he added.

Continuing his sharp critique, Rubin has strongly criticised former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for amplifying what he called exaggerated claims around Hardeep Singh Nijjar and the Khalistan movement. He also praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi's strategic diplomacy and called for firm action against Khalistani extremism.

"The grievances about Hardeep Singh Nijjar and the Khalistan movement were not real": Rubin said, accusing Trudeau of appeasing radical Sikh extremists in Canada and shifting blame to India rather than acknowledging domestic issues.

Touching upon the issue of Khalistani extremism, Rubin stressed the importance of decisive measures from Canada. He said, "It is so essential that India continued to press Canada to address the Khalistan movement head-on to designate the Khalistan movement and extremists as terrorists, to uproot terror finance and to stigmatize forever these groups that really have no popular legitimacy back home in Punjab or for that matter, among the larger peaceful Sikh community in Canada. It's time to stop allowing the loud, extreme voices to win and instead recognise that those same loud, extreme voices oftentimes deserve to be in prison for their involvement in terror, tax fraud and organised crime in Canada, in San Francisco and elsewhere."

Reiterating his criticism of Trudeau, Rubin again dismissed the narrative around Nijjar and the Khalistan movement. He said, "The grievances about Hardeep Singh Nijjar and the Khalistan movement were not real. They were exaggerations that Justin Trudeau amplified...Justin Trudeau may have wanted so much to appease radical Sikh extremists in various constituencies that he was willing to take an organised crime hit between various Sikh groups and mafias and blame an outside power for it, rather than acknowledge the problem and the fault was Canada's alone. That is Justin Trudeau's problem. But now that Justin Trudeau is gone and likely will never return to power, Prime Minister Carney is taking a sober approach and recognising that he is not going to be tied to Justin Trudeau's fictions..."

In this context, Rubin has come out swinging against Khalistanis while praising Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's decision to accept Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney's invitation to the G7 Summit (from June 15 to 17) in Canada.

He believes PM Modi's magnanimity in attending the summit shows "India has nothing to hide."

Speaking to ANI on Wednesday, Rubin contrasted former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's approach with that of Carney's, saying Carney "understands the importance of India" and wants to "restore maturity to the relationship."

"Canadian PM Mark Carney originally was a banker. He understands the importance of India. Justin Trudeau was a politician who peddled in image and imagination, and therefore it makes sense that Carney wants to restore maturity to the relationship," Rubin told ANI.

"It makes sense for Prime Minister Modi to show that the problem was not Canada itself, but the immaturity and unprofessionalism of Justin Trudeau," he added.

Further, the American security expert highlighted that the Indian government is "willing to have a serious dialogue, much like they had with the United States."

Rubin added that the problem with "Justin Trudeau is that for his own domestic, political reasons and to assuage radical constituencies, he was shooting from the hip without any factual basis to support his accusations against India."

"What Prime Minister Modi is showing is that India has nothing to hide. If you're going to have a serious law enforcement dialogue, it's got to be two-way. We've got to talk about illegal immigration into Canada, terror finance in Canada, radical Sikh mafias and how the Khalistan movement is tied to organised crime and terrorism," he added.

Rubin also raised concerns about the Khalistanis' movements, stating, "When you give haven to any terror group. Ultimately, your interests are going to be subverted."

"Justin Trudeau and frankly Pierre Trudeau before him, by embracing and tolerating the Khalistan movement in the face of some of the worst terrorist attacks in the 20th century, what they did is ultimately undermine Canada's moral authority and its strategic importance," he added.

Reader Comments

R
Rahul K.
Finally someone in the West speaking sense! Canada has been playing vote bank politics with Khalistani extremists for too long. As an Indian, I'm glad PM Modi is taking a strong stand while keeping doors open for mature diplomacy. 🇮🇳
P
Priya M.
While I agree Canada needs to control extremists, we must also reflect - why do some groups find support abroad? Maybe better governance in Punjab would reduce alienation. Both countries need mature handling of this sensitive issue.
A
Arjun S.
Rubin saab has nailed it! Canada was behaving like a spoiled child under Trudeau. India is a rising power, not some banana republic to be bullied. Hope Carney understands this and stops pampering anti-India elements for political gains.
S
Sunita P.
As someone with family in Canada, I'm relieved to see this change in tone. The Khalistani issue was poisoning relations and making life difficult for ordinary Indians there. Hope the new PM walks the talk on cracking down on extremism.
V
Vikram J.
The football analogy is perfect! For decades Western nations have treated India like this - kick us when convenient, embrace when they need something. Time for equal relationships. Canada needs India more than we need them - trade, IT, pharma, you name it.
N
Neha T.
While I support strong action against extremism, we must be careful not to paint all Sikh activists with the same brush. Many in the diaspora are peaceful community builders. The focus should be only on violent elements, not dissent. Balance is key.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Your email won't be published


Disclaimer: Comments here reflect the author's views alone. Insulting or using offensive language against individuals, communities, religion, or the nation is illegal.

Tags: