NewKerala.com

IMF's Remittance Incentive Cut Sparks Fears of Hawala Surge in Pakistan

The IMF has advised Pakistan to significantly reduce government-funded incentives for foreign remittances as part of its $7 billion bailout programme. Analysts warn this move could drive a crucial portion of the country's largest source of foreign exchange—$38 billion last year—back into informal channels like hawala and hundi. These remittances are vital, having recently helped Pakistan achieve a small current account surplus despite a massive trade deficit. With foreign direct investment remaining weak, experts emphasize that remittances are more critical than FDI for supporting the currency and averting another forex crisis.

Key Points: IMF Urges Pakistan to Cut Remittance Incentives, Risks Hawala Shift

  • IMF recommends cutting fiscal support
  • Remittances are Pakistan's largest forex source
  • Experts warn of shift to informal hawala/hundi
  • $38 billion in remittances exceeded exports
2 min read

IMF asks Pakistan to cut remittance incentives, experts warn of shift to hawala channels

IMF asks Pakistan to reduce remittance incentives, raising expert fears of money shifting to informal hawala channels, threatening $38 billion in vital foreign exchange.

"cutting these incentives could weaken official banking routes and push more remittances towards backstreet networks - Nikkei Asia report"

New Delhi, Dec 25

The International Monetary Fund has asked the Pakistan government to reduce its spending on incentives given for foreign remittances, a move that has raised concerns among experts about a possible shift of money flows back to informal channels.

According to a report by Nikkei Asia, analysts fear that cutting these incentives could weaken official banking routes and push more remittances towards backstreet networks such as hawala and hundi.

The IMF's recommendation was mentioned in a staff-level report released earlier this month after the second review of Pakistan's $7 billion bailout programme.

In the report, the IMF said that lowering the cost of cross-border payments would reduce the need for government-funded incentives.

It added that Pakistan plans to assess the barriers and costs involved in remittances and prepare an action plan, while significantly reducing fiscal support for these incentives.

Remittances play a crucial role in Pakistan's economy as they are the country's largest source of foreign exchange.

In the last financial year ending in June, Pakistan received around $38 billion in remittances, which was higher than its export earnings of about $32 billion.

The government currently offers incentives by giving cash rebates to banks and exchange companies for remittances sent through official channels.

These benefits are often passed on to overseas Pakistanis in the form of better exchange rates or small bonuses.

Pakistan's balance of payments remains under pressure due to a large trade deficit of nearly $27 billion in the previous financial year.

However, strong remittance inflows helped the country record a small current account surplus of around $2 billion.

Other sources of foreign inflows have been weak, with foreign direct investment standing at roughly $2 billion, making remittances vital for supporting the currency and preventing another foreign exchange crisis.

Experts say remittances have a much bigger impact on Pakistan's economy than foreign direct investment.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
From an economic perspective, the IMF has a point about reducing fiscal burdens. But the timing and context are everything. When your exports are weak and FDI is low, you can't risk destabilizing your largest source of foreign currency. Hope they find a middle path.
R
Rohit P
$38 billion in remittances! That's a staggering number and shows how dependent their economy is on overseas workers. Cutting incentives is like shooting yourself in the foot. The hawala system will get a massive boost, which isn't good for anyone in the region. 🇮🇳
P
Priya S
It's a tough situation. The government is spending to keep remittances coming officially, but that spending is itself a strain. The real issue is the lack of a productive, export-oriented economy. Remittances are a cushion, not a solution.
A
Aman W
Hawala channels are difficult to track and can be misused. If more money flows that way due to this policy, it could have security implications beyond just economics. The IMF should consider these regional realities, not just textbook economics.
N
Nisha Z
Respectfully, I think the criticism of IMF here is a bit misplaced. Their goal is to make the system sustainable. If the cost of cross-border payments is reduced, as they suggest, then incentives won't be needed. The problem is the high cost and barriers, not the IMF's advice.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50