Our ideals were not at all anti-Islam and anti-Muslim: Rajnath Singh

ANI April 19, 2025 204 views

Rajnath Singh invoked historical Hindu-Muslim unity through figures like Shivaji’s Muslim bodyguard Madari. He criticized textbook glorification of Aurangzeb, quoting Nehru’s condemnation of the Mughal ruler. The Defence Minister contrasted Aurangzeb’s intolerance with Dara Shikoh’s scholarly legacy. His remarks come amid Maharashtra’s ongoing political debates over Mughal history.

"Our ideals were not at all anti-Islam and anti-Muslim... Shivaji’s most trusted bodyguard was Muslim youth Madari" – Rajnath Singh
Chhatrapati Sambhaji Nagar, April 19: Defence Minister Rajnath Singh on Friday said that India's core ideals have never been anti-Islam or anti-Muslim, citing examples from history to emphasise the nation's long-standing tradition of religious harmony and inclusivity.

Key Points

1

Singh cites Hakim Khan Suri fighting with Maharana Pratap

2

Slams Aurangzeb glorification in textbooks

3

Quotes Nehru calling Aurangzeb fanatic

4

References Dara Shikoh’s murder by Aurangzeb

Addressing a public gathering in Chhatrapati Sambhaji Nagar, Singh referred to key figures in Indian history to underline the unity between communities during the country's civilizational and freedom struggles.

"Our ideals were not at all anti-Islam and anti-Muslim. Hakim Khan Suri fought alongside Maharana Pratap in the battle of Haldighati against the Mughals. Even in Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj's army, there were members of the Muslim community. Shivaji's most trusted bodyguard was a Muslim youth named Madari. Maharana Pratap and Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj are our heroes," Singh said.

The Defence Minister also took aim at what he described as the "glorification" of Mughal ruler Aurangzeb in Indian history textbooks. He said such portrayals distort historical facts and wrongly encourage admiration for a ruler whose legacy is deeply controversial.

"In our history books, even a cruel and ruthless ruler like Aurangzeb has been presented in a glorified manner. Due to this distorted history, some people attempt to portray Aurangzeb as a hero. An attempt is being made to create sympathy for Aurangzeb without knowing the truth..." he said.

Quoting former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, Singh said, "Pandit Nehru himself called Aurangzeb a fanatic and bigoted ruler. He wrote that Aurangzeb imposed the Jizya tax on Hindus and tried to suppress Rajputs, Sikhs, Marathas, and others. He also destroyed many Hindu temples."

Singh further recalled the execution of Dara Shikoh, Aurangzeb's elder brother and a well-known scholar who translated the Upanishads.

"How can such a ruler be anyone's hero? Such people never talk about Dara Shikoh, who translated the Upanishads. Who got Dara Shikoh killed? Aurangzeb got him killed. His hatred for Sanatan culture was behind Dara Shikoh's murder," he said.

Aurangzeb has been a deeply polarising figure in Maharashtra, and controversies surrounding the Mughal ruler frequently resurface in the state's political discourse. Nagpur was the centre of violent clashes between two communities after right-wing outfits held a protest demanding the removal of Aurangzeb's tomb.

Samajwadi Party MLA Abu Azmi recently sparked controversy in the Maharashtra Assembly, where he was suspended for defending Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb, describing him as a "good administrator."

Aurangzeb's reign is often associated with religious intolerance and military expansion. His conflicts with the Maratha Empire, including the capture and execution of Sambhaji, are significant historical events.

Reader Comments

P
Priya K.
Interesting historical perspective! We often forget how diverse our freedom fighters' armies were. Madari's story deserves more attention in our textbooks. 🇮🇳
A
Amit S.
While I appreciate highlighting India's pluralistic traditions, I wish the speech had focused more on present-day unity rather than historical conflicts. The past is important, but we need forward-looking solutions too.
R
Rahul M.
Finally someone said it! Our history books have whitewashed Aurangzeb's atrocities for too long. Dara Shikoh's contributions to interfaith understanding deserve more recognition than his brother's tyranny.
F
Fatima Z.
As a Muslim, I appreciate the acknowledgment that India's ideals aren't anti-Islam. But can we move beyond Aurangzeb debates? There are so many positive Muslim figures in Indian history we could celebrate instead.
S
Sanjay P.
The Hakim Khan Suri example is powerful - shows how religion wasn't the dividing line in our history, but principles were. More Indians should know these stories of unity against oppression. 🙏

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Your email won't be published


Disclaimer: Comments here reflect the author's views alone. Insulting or using offensive language against individuals, communities, religion, or the nation is illegal.

Tags:
You May Like!