Key Points

The IBC Amendment Bill 2025 aims to speed up insolvency resolution by reducing delays and improving governance. Key changes include faster case admission and enhanced creditor rights. The bill also introduces measures for group insolvency and cross-border cases. These reforms are expected to maximize asset recovery and streamline the process.

Key Points: Sitharaman Introduces IBC Amendment Bill 2025 for Faster Insolvency Resolution

  • Bill introduces Creditor-Initiated Insolvency Resolution Process (CIIRP)
  • Mandates faster admission of cases based on default evidence
  • Strengthens CoC powers in liquidation supervision
  • Enables coordinated insolvency for group companies
3 min read

IBC Amendment Bill 2025, has provisions for faster and efficient resolution of insolvency cases

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman tables IBC Amendment Bill 2025 to streamline insolvency resolution, cut delays, and strengthen governance.

"The proposed amendments will significantly cut admission timelines and reduce value erosion. – Government Official"

New Delhi, August 13

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Tuesday introduced the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill, 2025 in the Lok Sabha, aiming to reduce delays and strengthen governance of the insolvency resolution process.

The Bill, which proposes several structural and procedural changes to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, was referred to a Select Committee for wider examination.

The proposed amendments in the bill seeks to incorporate new concepts including a Creditor-Initiated Insolvency Resolution Process (CIIRP), enabling provisions and measures to enhance efficiency at both resolution and liquidation stages.

Under the existing law, applications for initiating corporate insolvency resolution must be admitted within 14 days, but in practice the process takes over 434 days on average. To curb this delay, Section 7 of the insolvency and bankruptcy code (IBC Code) is proposed to be amended to mandate admission solely on the existence of defaults.

Records from information utilities is proposed to serve as sufficient evidence when the applicant is a financial institution. This is expected to significantly cut admission timelines and reduce value erosion.

To Streamline the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) many reforms were proposed in the bill. It includes expanding the definition of resolution plans to allow asset sales, restricting the corporate applicant's role in proposing resolution professionals, clarifying government dues priority, and placing tighter controls on the withdrawal of CIRP applications.

The amendments also proposed a monitoring committee for plan implementations and give creditors a right to initiate such proceedings.

The amendments in the bill also empowers the Committee of Creditors (CoC) to supervise liquidation and if needed replace liquidators with a two-thirds vote.

To fast-track process, the amendments allows new CIIRP to select financial institutions and initiate insolvency outside court under the supervision of a resolution professional. The debtor can also retain management control under professional supervision.

Objections can be raised within 30 days, and the adjudicating authority will be empowered to convert it into a standard CIRP if resolution is not achieved within 150 days.

For group insolvency cases, a new Chapter V-A is introduced in the new bill, to enable coordinated or consolidated insolvency proceedings for group companies.

It allows shared benches, coordinated CoCs, common professionals, and enforceable inter-company agreements to reduce duplication and maximise value.

The Bill introduces new Section 240C, for cross-border insolvency cases, which empowers the government to frame rules for cross-border insolvency and designate dedicated benches, moving beyond the current bilateral arrangement system.

Other Reforms in the bill includes provisions like removing the interim moratorium for personal guarantors, measures to prevent fraudulent transactions, an electronic portal for IBC processes, greater regulatory powers for IBBI, and decriminalisation of certain offences.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
As a small business owner, I'm concerned about the creditor-initiated process. While faster resolution is good, we need safeguards against frivolous cases that could push genuine businesses into insolvency unnecessarily.
A
Aman W
The group insolvency provisions are a game-changer! Many Indian businesses operate as conglomerates. This will help preserve value across group companies instead of piecemeal resolutions. Good move 👍
S
Sarah B
Interesting to see India adopting more international best practices with the cross-border insolvency provisions. This will help foreign investors feel more secure about doing business here.
V
Vikram M
The electronic portal is long overdue! Our courts and tribunals need more digital transformation. Hope they implement it properly with good UX design, not just another clunky government website.
K
Kavitha C
While the intentions are good, I worry about implementation. Our legal system is already overburdened. Without proper training for resolution professionals and judges, these timelines might remain only on paper.
D
David E
The provision allowing debtors to retain management control under supervision is interesting. It balances creditor rights with giving companies a real chance to turn around. Much better than the current all-or-nothing approach.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50