Key Points

The IAEA chief warns that Iran's nuclear capabilities remain largely intact despite recent US strikes. Rafael Grossi stated Tehran could restart uranium enrichment within months, contradicting Trump's claims of total destruction. The Pentagon's early assessment aligns with Grossi's remarks, suggesting only a temporary setback. The debate over the effectiveness of US military action continues as Iran maintains its nuclear program is peaceful.

Key Points: IAEA Chief Grossi Warns Iran Could Restart Uranium Enrichment Soon

  • IAEA confirms Iran's nuclear program not fully destroyed
  • US strikes only delayed enrichment by months
  • Trump claimed program was "obliterated"
  • Iran insists its nuclear ambitions are peaceful
3 min read

IAEA Chief says Iran may restart Uranium enrichment in months

IAEA's Rafael Grossi says Iran's nuclear program remains intact and could resume uranium enrichment within months, contradicting Trump's claims.

"The capacities they have are there. They can have, in a matter of months, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium. - Rafael Grossi, IAEA Chief"

Washington DC, June 30

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Rafael Grossi said that US strikes on Iran fell short of causing total damage to its nuclear programme and that Tehran could restart enriching uranium "in a matter of months," contradicting US President Donald Trump's claims the US set Tehran's ambitions back by "decades", CNN reported.

Grossi's comments appear to support an early assessment from the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency, which suggests the United States' strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites last week did not destroy the core components of its nuclear programme, and likely only set it back by months.

While the final military and intelligence assessment has yet to come, Trump has repeatedly claimed to have "completely and totally obliterated" Tehran's nuclear programme.

The 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran began earlier this month when Israel launched an unprecedented attack it said aimed at preventing Tehran from developing a nuclear bomb. Iran has insisted its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes.

The US then struck three key Iranian nuclear sites before a ceasefire began. The extent of the damage to Tehran's nuclear programme has been hotly debated ever since.

US military officials have in recent days provided some new information about the planning of the strikes, but offered no new evidence of their effectiveness against Iran's nuclear programme.

Following classified briefings this week, Republican lawmakers acknowledged the US strikes may not have eliminated all of Iran's nuclear materials - but argued that this was never part of the military's mission, CNN reported.

Meanwhile, The Washington Post reported on Sunday that the US had obtained intercepted messages in which senior Iranian officials discussing the attacks said they were not as destructive as they anticipated.

Asked about the different assessments, Grossi, Director General of IAEA, said, "This hourglass approach in weapons of mass destruction is not a good idea."

"The capacities they have are there. They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that. But as I said, frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there," CNN reported, quoting Grossi.

"It is clear that there has been severe damage, but it's not total damage," Grossi went on to say. "Iran has the capacities there; industrial and technological capacities. So if they so wish, they will be able to start doing this again."

CNN further reported that Grossi said the IAEA has resisted pressure to say whether Iran has nuclear weapons or was close to having weapons before the strikes.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya N
As an Indian, I'm worried about nuclear proliferation in our neighborhood. Whether Iran restarts enrichment or not, we need to strengthen our own defense systems. Our scientists at DRDO are doing great work - let's support them!
A
Aditya G
Trump always exaggerates everything! Why is anyone surprised? The IAEA report proves what experts have been saying - you can't bomb away nuclear knowledge. India should use this as a lesson in our own strategic planning.
S
Sarah B
While I understand security concerns, I wish world leaders would focus more on peaceful nuclear energy cooperation rather than weapons. India's thorium reactor program is a great example of how nuclear tech can benefit humanity.
K
Karthik V
The Middle East tensions affect global oil prices which directly impacts Indian economy. Our government should accelerate renewable energy projects to reduce this vulnerability. Solar power is the future! ☀️
M
Meera T
Respectfully, I think the article could have included more perspectives from Middle Eastern nations. As Indians, we should be careful about forming opinions based only on Western media reports. Our foreign policy has always valued balanced reporting.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50