Key Points

West Bengal Governor CV Ananda Bose returned the Aparajita Bill to the state government after the Home Ministry raised concerns. The bill proposed mandatory death penalty for rape cases, which the Centre deemed excessive. A victim's father accused Kolkata Police of evidence tampering in the RG Kar case. The legislation had aimed to amend the new criminal code but faced objections over judicial discretion.

Key Points: Bengal Governor Returns Aparajita Bill Citing Home Ministry Queries

  • Governor cites Centre's objections to mandatory death penalty provisions
  • Bill removes judicial discretion in rape sentencing
  • MHA warns it weakens minor protections
  • Victim's father alleges police tampering in RG Kar case
3 min read

Home Ministry raised certain queries: Bengal Governor on returning Aparajita Bill to state govt

West Bengal Governor CV Ananda Bose sends back Aparajita Bill after Centre flags concerns over mandatory death penalty and judicial discretion.

"It's a constitutional obligation of the Governor to either give assent or return the bill. – CV Ananda Bose"

Kolkata, July 27

West Bengal Governor C V Ananda Bose has returned the Aparajita Women and Child (West Bengal Criminal Laws Amendment) Bill to the state government for reconsideration, citing serious objections raised by the Centre.

Speaking to ANI on Saturday, he said that it is the Governor's constitutional obligation to either give assent to the bill or return it to the Assembly.

"It's a constitutional obligation of the Governor to either give assent to the bill, return it to the Assembly for reconsideration, or send it to the President for reserve. Given its broader implications, I reserved it for the President of India. Now the Home Ministry has raised certain queries, which I have also taken up with the state government for their response," said Bose.

The Bill, passed unanimously by the West Bengal Assembly in September 2024, aims to enhance punishment for rape and sexual offences.

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has flagged multiple provisions in the Bill as "excessively harsh and disproportionate". The MHA has raised concerns about removing judicial discretion in sentencing, citing Supreme Court rulings that stress the importance of retaining judicial discretion.

The Centre is of the view that removing stricter penalties for sexual assault of minors could weaken protections for vulnerable groups.

Reacting to the Governor's move on Saturday, the father of the RG Kar rape and murder victim accused Kolkata Police of tampering with evidence and failing to act in his daughter's case.

He told ANI, "Kolkata Police did nothing in my daughter's case except for evidence tampering... There was no provision for evidence tampering in this bill. It will not matter to us whether the bill is passed or not."

He also criticised Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, alleging that the bill was introduced in the Assembly to "deceive the people" of the state.

"The Chief Minister introduced this bill in the Assembly to deceive the people of West Bengal. She also sent it to the Governor and the President. But they rejected the bill, which is a good thing," he said.

Earlier on Thursday, Governor CV Ananda Bose sent back the Aparajita Women and Child (West Bengal Criminal Laws Amendment) Bill, 2024, to the state government.

The bill proposes the death penalty or life imprisonment for those convicted of rape and seeks to amend sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), the new criminal code.

The West Bengal Legislative Assembly had unanimously passed the Aparajita Bill on September 3, 2024. The Bill was sent to President Droupadi Murmu by the Governor on September 6, 2024.

The legislation passed, following the rape and murder of a doctor at RG Kar Medical College and Hospital in Kolkata, provides for the death penalty in five categories of offences - rape, rape by a police officer or public servant, rape causing death or resulting in a persistent vegetative state, gang rape, and repeat offenders.

According to Raj Bhawan officials, the bill proposes making the death penalty mandatory in cases where the victim dies or is left in a vegetative state under Section 66 of the BNS.

The Bill also proposes to delete Section 65 of the BNS, 2023, thereby eliminating the distinction in punishment for the rape of women under 16 and under 12 years of age, according to Raj Bhawan.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
As a mother, I fully support harsher punishments for rapists. Our daughters need stronger protection. The judicial system moves too slowly - sometimes strict laws are the only deterrent.
R
Rohit P
The father's statement is heartbreaking 💔 But he's right - laws alone won't help if police don't do their job properly. First fix the system, then make new laws.
K
Kavya N
While I support strict laws, removing judicial discretion completely may be problematic. Each case is different - some deserve mercy. The SC has rightly cautioned against one-size-fits-all punishments.
S
Sarah B
This political tug-of-war is disgusting. Can't our leaders put aside differences when it comes to women's safety? Both state and centre need to work together for once.
V
Vikram M
The bill's intention is good but implementation is key. We already have strict laws - focus should be on faster trials and better policing. More laws won't help if existing ones aren't enforced properly.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50