Key Points

The Haryana Human Rights Commission has stepped in after a Public Health Department employee was denied his salary because his Aadhaar records falsely showed him as deceased. Despite working regularly, the administrative lapse left him without wages for months, causing financial and mental distress. The Commission called this a violation of constitutional and international human rights protections. It has ordered immediate corrective action and demanded a report on the resolution by September 23.

Key Points: Haryana Rights Panel Acts on Employee Declared Dead in Aadhaar Records

  • HHRC takes suo-motu notice of salary denial due to Aadhaar error
  • Employee wrongly marked deceased despite working regularly
  • Commission flags violation of right to livelihood and dignity
  • Directs immediate salary restoration and record correction
3 min read

Haryana rights panel takes cognizance of employee declared 'dead' in Aadhaar records

Haryana Human Rights Commission intervenes after a live employee is denied salary due to erroneous "deceased" Aadhaar status, calling it a rights violation.

"Sometimes the dead may exert greater influence than the living – HHRC cites Shakespeare while addressing the case"

Chandigarh, Aug 18

The Haryana Human Rights Commission has taken suo-motu cognizance of a media report highlighting an incident where a serving employee of the Public Health Department, a resident of Rohtak, was allegedly denied his salary in the post-COVID period because his Aadhaar record shows him as “deceased”.

This is despite the fact that he is alive and continues to discharge his duties regularly.

As a result of this administrative lapse, the employee has reportedly been deprived of his lawful remuneration for an extended period.

Upon review, the Commission observed that the Public Health Department failed to update the employee’s record on the HKRN portal, despite being aware that the “deceased” status in Aadhaar was erroneous.

This inaction has caused the complainant prolonged financial hardship and mental agony, undermining his right to work with dignity and creating unnecessary uncertainty.

The Commission expressed concern that such errors can severely affect an individual’s livelihood, confidence, and peace of mind.

The full bench of the Commission, comprising Chairperson Justice Lalit Batra and members Kuldip Jain and Deep Bhatia, noted that such treatment appears contrary to Article 7 of the United Nations International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), which recognises the right to just and favourable conditions of work, including remuneration ensuring a decent living for workers and their families.

The non-payment of wages for work performed constitutes a violation of the employee’s human rights, particularly the right to livelihood and dignity as guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution and reaffirmed in international human rights instruments.

The department’s inaction amounts to an arbitrary deprivation of earnings, impairing the complainant’s ability to support himself and his family.

Reflecting on the situation, the Commission recalled a sentiment from Shakespeare’s famous play 'Julius Caesar' that 'sometimes the dead may exert greater influence than the living'.

However, the Commission observed that the present case revealed a stark inversion of that idea: a man undeniably alive, diligently performing his duties, is being officially treated as deceased. This erroneous classification not only deprived him of his rightful wages but also subjected him to indignity and unnecessary hardship.

Ignoring the service of a living employee in such a manner is an administrative failure that the Commission cannot overlook.

Finding prima facie evidence of administrative negligence and violation of the complainant’s rights, the Commission directed immediate action to restore the employee’s salary, correct all records, and ensure that no employee faces such an anomalous and unjust situation in the future.

The Commission has called for a report on the necessary corrections to the Aadhaar record of the complainant from the Additional Deputy Commissioner, Rohtak, and the Commissioner and Secretary, Citizen Resources Information Department (CRID), before the next hearing on September 23.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As someone working in HR, I can say such errors happen more often than people realize. The Aadhaar system needs better verification protocols. This case highlights why we must humanize our digital systems.
A
Arjun K
Typical babu mentality - file pe chalta hai, insaan pe nahi! The department knew about the mistake but didn't act. They should be fined for this negligence. Aadhaar has become more of a headache than help these days.
P
Priya S
My uncle faced similar issue last year in Punjab! Took 6 months to correct his 'dead' status in records. The trauma it causes to families is unimaginable. Government should make grievance redressal faster for such cases.
K
Karthik V
While the system failed, I appreciate how the Commission quoted Shakespeare to make their point! Shows our judiciary has both wisdom and wit. Hope this sets precedent for similar cases across India.
M
Michael C
This is why we need decentralized identity systems. One database error shouldn't make someone officially 'dead'. Blockchain technology could prevent such nightmares. India should lead in digital rights innovation.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50