Key Points

An immigration expert has strongly criticized the Trump administration's new H-1B visa restrictions. Sarah Pierce argues the policies are driving foreign talent away from the United States. She specifically calls the proposed $100,000 application fee shocking and predicts legal challenges. Pierce also warns that the crackdown could hurt American universities and conflict with goals to bring manufacturing back to the US.

Key Points: Trump H-1B Visa Crackdown Shockingly Anti-Business Expert Says

  • New DHS proposal replaces the H-1B lottery with a weighted selection system favoring higher-skilled workers
  • Pierce argues the policies make the US unattractive to foreign students and workers
  • She highlights the financial harm to US universities dependent on international student revenue
  • The expert believes corporations are scared to push back against the administration's changes
4 min read

H-1B visa crackdown 'shockingly anti-business', says US Immigration expert

Immigration expert Sarah Pierce slams new Trump H-1B visa rules, calling the $100,000 fee shocking and the policy harmful to US universities and businesses.

"The $100,000 fee is just shocking on its face. I am very sure that it will be challenged in court. - Sarah Pierce"

Washington, Sep 25

As the Trump administration announced new restrictions on H-1B visas, a leading immigration expert in Washington believes that the Trump administration has taken a "shockingly anti-business stance" in its crackdown on the visa programme.

In an exclusive interview with IANS, Sarah Pierce, the Director of Social Policy at Third Way, a think tank, argued that the current policies are making the United States "unattractive" to foreign students and workers.

"Everything that the Trump administration is doing is causing foreign talent to leave the United States, because they have established attacks on international students. There's a lot that the Trump administration is doing to make the United States unattractive to both international students and international workers," she added.

Pierce also emphasised that the targeting of international students would, in turn, hurt American students.

"US universities are hugely dependent on the revenue that comes from international students who pay not only full tuition, but even usually additional fees to study in the United States, and those benefits go towards scholarships that are frequently used on American citizens," she noted.

On Tuesday, the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) proposed to "amend its regulations" governing the H-1B process.

The DHS proposal seeks to scrap the existing lottery system and implement "a weighted selection process" that would generally favour the allocation of H-1B visas to higher-skilled workers.

The proposal comes after US President Donald Trump signed a proclamation last week to crack down on H-1B visas, announcing a $100,000 fee for each new application.

Pierce, who is a former Policy Analyst in the Humanitarian Affairs Division of the Office of Policy and Strategy at US Citizenship and Immigration Services, said the hefty fee and the new weightage system will likely be challenged in court.

"The $100,000 fee is just shocking on its face. I am very sure that it will be challenged in court. I think it will be difficult to establish the grounds. These are absurdly high challenges for a program that's very important to many US employers," she highlighted.

While signing the proclamation at the White House last week, Trump said the "incentive is to hire American workers".

A White House Spokesperson also told IANS last week that the policy would "discourage companies from spamming the system".

"President Trump promised to put American workers first, and this common-sense action does just that by discouraging companies from spamming the system and driving down wages. It also gives certainty to American businesses that actually want to bring high-skilled workers to our great country but have been trampled on by abuses of the system," said Taylor Rogers, the White House spokeswoman.

Pierce acknowledged that there were "significant problems" with the H-1B visas, but there was no need to "burn this programme down".

"I do not think that we need to burn this programme down or approach it in the way that the Trump administration is they are taking a chainsaw when the solution requires a scalpel. There are ways to adjust the program to allow individuals to push back when there are cases where companies are blatantly using the H-1B visa to replace US workers," she said.

She highlighted the recent deportation of South Korean workers from a Hyundai factory in Georgia as an example of "direct conflict" between the administration's priorities of bringing manufacturing back to the United States and continuing the immigration crackdown.

"This administration's approach to immigration is in direct conflict with their approach to tariffs and their desire to bring manufacturing back into the United States. If we're attacking the ability of high-skilled immigrants to come into the United States, that's going to harm companies that may be interested in coming to the United States to establish operations," she added.

On the relative silence of tech companies and other corporations over the H-1B visa restrictions, Pierce believed that big companies are scared of angering the administration.

"One of the most frightening things about this current administration is how scared they have made corporations and businesses in the United States. We are in a very scary moment in American politics, and it is because of that moment that we're not seeing a lot of push back from businesses on these H-1B visa changes," she added.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
While I understand the need to protect American jobs, this approach seems extreme. The weighted selection system might actually benefit highly skilled Indian professionals who have advanced degrees from top universities.
P
Priya S
Many Indian families have their children studying in US universities. If international students start leaving, it will definitely impact the quality of education and research opportunities. This policy seems shortsighted.
M
Michael C
The expert makes a valid point about corporations being scared to speak up. Indian IT companies should also voice their concerns more strongly. This affects our economy too when remittances decrease.
V
Vikram M
Maybe this is a blessing in disguise for India. Instead of brain drain, our talented professionals might choose to stay and contribute to our own tech industry. We have great companies like TCS, Infosys that can benefit. 🇮🇳
R
Rohit P
The $100,000 fee is just outrageous! How can they justify this amount? This seems more like a political move than a practical immigration policy. Hope the courts strike this down.
A
Ananya R
While I agree there might be some abuse in the system, completely shutting doors to skilled professionals isn't the solution. The "chainsaw vs scalpel" analogy is perfect. There should be a balanced approach.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50