Unnao Rape Case Bail Sparks Outrage: Calls for Supreme Court Appeal

The Delhi High Court's decision to grant conditional bail to convicted former BJP leader Kuldeep Sengar in the Unnao rape case has triggered strong political reactions. Congress leader Udit Raj sharply criticized the order, alleging judicial bias and urging the government to appeal to the Supreme Court, even suggesting the death penalty. While the Samajwadi Party and UP LoP acknowledged the judicial process with caution, the court imposed strict bail conditions, including a distance mandate from the survivor. The bail is contingent on Sengar adhering to multiple restrictions, with violation leading to immediate cancellation.

Key Points: Unnao Rape Case: Bail to Kuldeep Sengar Draws Political Ire

  • Delhi HC grants conditional bail
  • Congress calls for SC appeal
  • Bail includes strict conditions
  • Opposition reacts cautiously
3 min read

'Govt should appeal in SC': Cong leader on bail to Kuldeep Sengar in Unnao rape case

Congress demands SC appeal after Delhi HC grants bail to Kuldeep Sengar, convicted in the Unnao rape case. SP, LoP react cautiously.

"The government should file an appeal in the Supreme Court... I feel the judge is biased. - Congress leader Udit Raj"

New Delhi, Dec 24

Strong political reactions have emerged following the Delhi High Court's decision to grant conditional bail to expelled BJP leader Kuldeep Singh Sengar, who was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment in the 2017 Unnao rape case.

Reacting sharply to the court's order, Congress leader Udit Raj questioned the decision and called on the government to challenge it in the Supreme Court.

"The government should file an appeal in the Supreme Court, and such a judge should not be assigned cases involving sensitive matters. I feel the judge is biased, especially given that this was a very serious criminal case," Udit Raj said.

Emphasising the gravity of the crime, he added, "There are many serious cases, but this one was highly highlighted. If, in such a case, the judiciary decides to suspend the life imprisonment of such a major criminal, someone responsible for killing many people, it is wrong. The government should appeal, and this person should be given the death penalty."

Samajwadi Party Deputy Chief Whip R.K. Verma, while reacting cautiously, said the matter falls within the domain of the judiciary. "This is a matter of the judiciary, and I cannot comment on the court's order. However, our sympathy is with the victim's family. We do not have the right to comment on the judiciary's decision," Verma said.

Leader of Opposition in the Uttar Pradesh Assembly, Mata Prasad Pandey, also acknowledged the judicial process. "Now this is the court's order, the court has granted him bail, so what can we do about it?" he remarked.

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday granted conditional relief to Kuldeep Sengar by suspending his life sentence during the pendency of his appeal challenging the conviction. A Division Bench comprising Justices Subramonium Prasad and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar ordered his release on bail.

The court directed Sengar to furnish a personal bond of Rs 15 lakh along with three sureties of the same amount. It also imposed strict conditions, including a directive that Sengar shall not come within a five-kilometre radius of the survivor's residence and must remain in Delhi for the duration of the bail period.

Additionally, Sengar has been ordered to report to the local police station every week, refrain from threatening or influencing the survivor or her mother, and deposit his passport with the trial court. The High Court made it clear that any violation of these conditions would result in the cancellation of bail.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
While I respect the judiciary, this bail order feels like a slap on the face of every woman fighting for justice. Conditions like staying 5km away are a joke for someone with his influence. The system seems to protect the powerful. 😔
D
David E
Reading this from abroad. The bail conditions seem strict on paper—weekly police checks, passport surrender, bond amount. The court likely has its legal reasons for suspension pending appeal. But the optics are terrible and understandably upsetting for the public.
A
Aditya G
Udit Raj is right to demand an appeal. But let's not forget, this is the same system that convicted him. The appeal process is his right, but granting bail to a convict in a case of this magnitude shakes public confidence. Hope SC takes it up swiftly.
S
Sarah B
The political reactions are telling. The SP leader's "sympathy" and "can't comment" stance is so weak. Where is the outrage? This transcends politics. It's about basic humanity and ensuring a rape survivor gets justice without fear.
K
Karthik V
Bail in a life sentence case? This is why people lose faith in the system. The rich and powerful play by different rules. My heart goes out to the brave survivor and her mother. They need protection now more than ever.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50