Key Points

Punjab's ruling AAP has strongly criticized Governor Gulab Chand Kataria and the Central government over their stance on flood relief funds. The party leaders accused the BJP-led Centre of being anti-people by sticking to outdated SDRF rules. They highlighted how the current compensation of ₹6,800 per acre is inadequate given that inflation has tripled since the rules were framed in 2010. The AAP demanded immediate amendment of SDRF rules to provide proper relief to flood-affected people in Punjab.

Key Points: AAP Slams Governor Kataria Centre Over Punjab Flood Relief Fund

  • AAP leaders term Governor's statement and Centre's stance on SDRF as completely unnecessary
  • Accuse BJP-led Centre of hiding behind rules during Punjab's gravest calamity
  • Question PM Modi for meeting Governor repeatedly but ignoring elected CM
  • Demand SDRF rules amendment as current compensation is unacceptable due to inflation
2 min read

Governor's statement, Centre's stance on floods unnecessary, says Punjab AAP

Punjab AAP leaders accuse Governor and BJP-led Centre of being anti-people over SDRF rules, demanding immediate amendments for flood compensation.

"The Central government keeps this fund precisely for states so that it can be used during disasters or emergencies. - AAP Leaders"

Chandigarh, Oct 2

Punjab's ruling Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) on Thursday strongly reacted to the statement of Governor Gulab Chand Kataria, who said that the state government is treating the State Disaster Response Fund (SDRF) as its own fund and that no change in the rules on its usage is possible.

AAP leader Baltej Pannu and spokesperson Neel Garg termed the Governor’s statement and the Centre’s stance as unnecessary, noting, in a statement, that the SDRF is essentially the State Disaster Relief Fund.

"The Central government keeps this fund precisely for states so that it can be used during disasters or emergencies."

The AAP leaders accused the BJP-led Centre of hiding behind rules when nature’s fury is so grave, saying this only means the Centre "does not want to stand with Punjab during its biggest calamity".

Pannu questioned the Governor, saying: “When the Prime Minister can meet a Governor again and again, but does not spare time to meet an elected Chief Minister, then where exactly does this rule of ‘elected’ versus ‘selected’ apply?”

AAP spokesperson Garg described the stance of the Governor and the Centre as "completely anti-people".

Contending that in any welfare state, "rules are always framed for the welfare of the people", he pointed out that the SDRF rules were framed in 2010, but since then inflation has tripled.

"Therefore, in today’s times, the Rs 6,800 per acre compensation is unacceptable, especially when at that time even the diesel rate was only Rs 38 per litre."

He expressed regret that even after one and a half months of Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann writing a letter to the Prime Minister, there has been no reply.

Garg stressed the statements of the Home Ministry and the Governor only indicate that the Centre "is not in the mood to change the SDRF rules".

Advising the Centre to abandon its stubborn attitude, he said that "if we truly want to help the people, then the rules must be amended as per present needs".

The AAP urged the Central government to think like a people-oriented government and to amend the rules without any delay in order to help the people of Punjab.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As someone who has family in affected areas, this political blame game is heartbreaking. People are losing their crops and homes, and all we hear is arguments about rules. Just help the people! 🙏
P
Priya S
The Governor's statement seems unnecessary during such a crisis. Rules should be flexible when people are suffering. Centre should show more empathy towards Punjab farmers.
M
Michael C
While I understand the need for immediate relief, there should be proper accountability in fund usage. Both state and centre need to work together rather than playing politics with people's lives.
A
Ananya R
Completely agree that rules from 2010 need revision! Everything has become so expensive since then. Our farmers deserve better compensation. Centre should listen to the elected government. 💪
K
Karthik V
The point about PM meeting Governor but not CM is valid. This selective approach doesn't help federal structure. During natural disasters, politics should take a backseat.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50