Godhra train burning: SC fixes first week of May for final hearing on criminal appeals

IANS April 24, 2025 232 views

The Supreme Court has scheduled a critical hearing for the Godhra train burning case in the first week of May. This case stems from a tragic 2002 incident where 59 people were killed, triggering widespread communal riots in Gujarat. The trial court initially convicted 31 persons, with 11 initially receiving death sentences later commuted to life imprisonment. The upcoming hearing represents a potentially significant moment in resolving this long-standing legal battle.

"Remission has to be considered by the appropriate government irrespective of the pendency of the appeal" - Supreme Court Bench
New Delhi, Apr 24: The Supreme Court on Thursday fixed May 6 and 7 for the hearing on a clutch of criminal appeals arising out of the 2002 Godhra train burning case.

Key Points

1

Supreme Court fixes hearing dates for Godhra train burning case

2

31 persons convicted in 2002 communal violence incident

3

Gujarat High Court previously upheld most convictions

4

Apex court dismissed bail pleas of three key convicts

A bench of Justices J. K. Maheshwari and Aravind Kumar could not take up the matter for hearing due to paucity of time.

The Justice Maheshwari-led Bench, at an earlier occasion, had expressed displeasure about the parties seeking adjournment.

Remarking that the apex court had deferred the hearing several times in the past, it had posted the matter highest on the board on February 13 for hearing after much reluctance. The apex court had then clarified that remission has to be considered by the appropriate government irrespective of the pendency of the appeal.

In February 2002, 59 people were killed when a coach of the train was burnt at Gujarat's Godhra, triggering riots in the state. In March 2011, the trial court convicted 31 persons, of whom 11 were sentenced to death and 20 to life. The court also acquitted 63 accused.

In October 2017, the Gujarat High Court upheld the conviction of all but commuted the death sentence of the 11 to life imprisonment. The convicts have filed criminal appeals against conviction, and the Gujarat government has also appealed against the commutation of the death penalty to a life sentence.

The Supreme Court, in August 2023, dismissed the bail pleas of three convicts, who were engaged in stone pelting or robbing of gold ornaments as per the findings of the trial court. It denied the relief considering the specific roles attributed to them and dismissed applications seeking bail till their appeal was decided by the top court. It had clarified that dismissal of their application for release will not prejudice the merits of their appeal pending in the Supreme Court. Earlier in April 2023, the top court had granted bail to eight convicts while rejecting the same to four others.

Reader Comments

R
Rahul K.
This case has dragged on for too long. Justice delayed is justice denied. Hope the SC finally gives closure to all affected families. 🙏
P
Priya M.
The judicial process needs to be more efficient. 22 years is an unacceptable timeline for resolving such an important case.
S
Sanjay T.
While I understand the need for thoroughness, the repeated adjournments make our justice system look weak. The SC should set stricter timelines for such sensitive cases.
A
Ananya R.
The victims' families have waited long enough. Hope this hearing brings them some peace. The trauma must be unimaginable 💔
V
Vikram P.
Interesting how the HC commuted the death sentences while upholding convictions. Shows how complex capital punishment cases can be. The SC's final word will be crucial.
N
Neha S.
Respectful criticism: The article could have included more context about why the hearings keep getting postponed. Understanding the procedural challenges would help readers better grasp the situation.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Your email won't be published


Disclaimer: Comments here reflect the author's views alone. Insulting or using offensive language against individuals, communities, religion, or the nation is illegal.

Tags: