NewKerala.com

Key Points

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee launched a sharp critique against the BJP's Muslim policies, highlighting perceived hypocrisy in their international interactions. She called for the INDIA bloc to remain united in opposing the Waqf Amendment Act, warning that the legislation could have broader implications. The Supreme Court is currently considering an interim order on the controversial act, indicating potential legal challenges. Banerjee's statements reflect ongoing political tensions surrounding religious legislation and minority representation in India.

Key Points: Mamata Targets Modi's UAE Muslim Hospitality Amid INDIA Bloc Rally

  • Mamata challenges BJP's Muslim policy with UAE hospitality critique
  • INDIA bloc urged to stay united against Waqf Act
  • Supreme Court may pass interim order on Waqf Amendment
  • Protests emerge over controversial legislative changes
2 min read

If you go to UAE, whose hospitality do you take?: Mamata Banerjee targets BJP appeals for INDIA bloc to stay united

Mamata Banerjee criticizes BJP's Muslim stance, calls for INDIA bloc unity against Waqf Amendment Act controversies

"You say one thing in your country and another outside - Mamata Banerjee"

Kolkata, April 17

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has launched a veiled attack against the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, accusing them of being "against Muslims" but receiving their hospitality in West Asian countries.

"You are against Muslims, but in Saudi Arabia, you meet Muslims... If you go to Dubai, UAE, whose hospitality do you take there... You say one thing in your country and another outside," Banerjee said while addressing the gathering in a meeting with Muslim clerics.

She further appealed to the INDIA bloc to "stay united and fight together" against the Waqf Amendment Act, whose passage has witnessed strong objections and protests from the Opposition.

"I will appeal to the INDIA bloc: let us stay united and fight together courageously. This is not a personal matter; it will affect everyone. Today, it is happening against you. Tomorrow, it will be against someone else. Now they want to bring UCC," the West Bengal Chief Minister said.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday indicated that it may pass interim order to stay certain key provisions of the recently passed Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, and also expressed concern over violence in West Bengal's Murshidabad district.

A three-judge bench of Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna and Justices PV Sanjay Kumar and KV Viswanathan said, "The one thing is very disturbing the violence that is taking place. The issue is before the court and we will decide."

The bench didn't pass any order but suggested that may stay certain provision including the inclusion of non-Muslims in Central Waqf Council and Waqf Boards, powers of collectors on deciding dispute over Waqf properties and provisions on de-notifying properties declared as waqf by courts.

The apex court was hearing a batch of petitions challenging the Constitutional validity of Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025.

During the hearing, the bench said that it is considering passing an interim order which will balance equities.

President Droupadi Murmu on April 5 gave her assent to the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, which was earlier passed by Parliament after heated debates in both Houses.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rahul K.
Interesting points raised by Mamata ji. The hypocrisy in foreign policy vs domestic rhetoric needs to be called out more often. Though I wish she'd focus more on solutions than just criticism. 🤔
P
Priya M.
Unity in opposition is crucial right now! The Waqf Amendment Act affects so many people. Glad someone is speaking up about this. #StandTogether
A
Amit S.
While I don't always agree with Mamata Banerjee, she makes a valid point about consistency in political messaging. You can't bash a community at home and then enjoy their hospitality abroad.
S
Sanjana R.
The Supreme Court's concern about violence is worrying. Hope they pass that interim order soon to prevent further tensions. Peace should be the priority for everyone!
K
Karan D.
Respectfully disagree with the article's framing. International diplomacy and domestic policies serve different purposes. This seems like an oversimplification of complex issues.
N
Neha P.
The UCC mention is important too! We need more discussions about how these changes will affect all communities, not just one. Thanks for covering this! 👍

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50