Key Points

Former Leader of Opposition Ami Ben Rawat has launched a significant challenge against the Vadodara Municipal Corporation's expensive bridge resurfacing project. She alleges that the ₹31 crore expenditure is unnecessary and potentially wasteful, demanding a comprehensive investigation into the decision-making process. Rawat has written to municipal authorities, questioning the need for extensive repairs on bridges that appear structurally sound. The controversy highlights ongoing concerns about infrastructure spending and financial accountability in Gujarat's municipal governance.

Key Points: Ami Rawat Exposes VMC's Rs 31 Crore Bridge Repair Controversy

  • Rawat demands transparent investigation into VMC's bridge repair project
  • Corporation accused of wasting ₹31 crore on unnecessary infrastructure work
  • Former LoP calls for vigilance enquiry into fund allocation
  • Multiple bridges reportedly do not need full resurfacing
3 min read

Ex-LoP demands probe into Vadodara's Rs 31 crore bridge resurfacing project

Former Gujarat LoP Ami Rawat challenges Vadodara Municipal Corporation's massive bridge resurfacing project, alleging financial mismanagement and unnecessary repairs.

"Several of the 12 bridges identified are structurally sound and do not require such extensive work - Ami Ben Rawat"

Vadodara, April 3

The Vadodara Municipal Corporation’s (VMC) resurfacing work on 12 bridges across the city at an estimated cost of ₹31 crore, has come under a cloud.

Former Leader of the Opposition (LoP) in the Gujarat Assembly, Ami Ben Rawat, has raised concerns over the expenditure, alleging that the corporation was wasting public funds on unnecessary repairs.

She has written to the Municipal Commissioner, Mayor, Deputy Mayor, and the current Opposition leader, demanding transparency and an investigation into the matter.

Rawat claims that instead of full-scale resurfacing, most of these bridges require only minor repairs or patchwork.

She further alleges that the corporation has not disclosed the advisory report on the bridge conditions before approving the project.

She has demanded that the report be made public, stating that the decision appears to be financially imprudent.

According to Rawat, several of the 12 bridges identified for resurfacing are structurally sound and do not require such extensive work.

Rawat has called for a vigilance enquiry into the corporation’s decision-making process, questioning whether due diligence was followed before allocating the funds.

The issue has sparked a political debate, with local leaders and civic activists now closely watching the developments.

As the controversy unfolds, the municipal authorities are yet to respond to the allegations.

With growing public concern over the utilisation of taxpayers’ money, the issue is expected to gain further traction in coming days.

Gujarat has witnessed several instances where infrastructure projects, particularly bridge constructions and repairs, have come under scrutiny due to allegations of mismanagement, financial irregularities, and safety concerns.

Notable cases include the Hatkeshwar flyover that was constructed in 2017 and began showing structural issues within four years. Cracks and damages led to partial demolition plans, raising questions about construction quality and oversight.

In January 2025, the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) faced accusations of favouritism in awarding the reconstruction tender, as the project had not commenced even four months post-approval.

In April 2023, the AMC approved the Sattadhar flyover project with an estimated cost of ₹81.49 crore.

The project faced criticism for its short defect liability period of three years, especially when compared to other projects with longer periods, leading to concerns about long-term accountability and construction standards. ​

Approximately 16 months ago, the Gujarat High Court criticised the state government for its lethargic approach to repairing bridges in Gondal.

The Gondal Municipality cited a lack of funds, struggling even with staff salaries, highlighting financial mismanagement and neglect in maintaining critical infrastructure.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya K.
This is exactly why we need more transparency in civic projects! ₹31 crore is no small amount - taxpayers deserve to know where every rupee goes. Kudos to Ami Ben Rawat for raising this issue 👏
R
Rahul M.
I cross two of these bridges daily. While they're not perfect, they definitely don't need complete resurfacing. Some pothole repairs would suffice. This seems like a classic case of inflated contracts.
S
Sunita P.
While I appreciate the concern, I think we should wait for the corporation's response before jumping to conclusions. Infrastructure maintenance is important for public safety after all.
V
Vikram J.
The Hatkeshwar flyover fiasco should have been a lesson! How many more examples do we need before proper accountability is enforced? 😠
A
Ananya T.
Respectfully, I disagree with some comments here. As a civil engineer, I know that what looks like minor surface damage can hide serious structural issues. But yes, transparency in reports is non-negotiable.
K
Karan S.
Same old story in Gujarat - big budgets, questionable quality. When will this cycle end? Maybe we need citizen oversight committees for all major projects.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50