Key Points

El Salvador’s Congress approved sweeping constitutional reforms allowing President Nayib Bukele indefinite reelection and extending presidential terms to six years. The ruling party, holding a supermajority, pushed through the changes with minimal opposition resistance. Critics argue the move weakens democracy, while supporters claim it empowers voters. Bukele’s leadership style, marked by a crackdown on gangs, remains popular despite concerns over civil liberties.

Key Points: El Salvador Approves Bukele's Indefinite Reelection and Six-Year Terms

  • Bukele’s New Ideas party secures indefinite reelection with 57-3 vote
  • Presidential terms extended from five to six years
  • Opposition warns of power concentration and corruption
  • Reforms align elections to let Bukele seek new term in 2027
3 min read

El Salvador lawmakers greenlight indefinite reelection, extend presidential terms to six years

El Salvador’s Congress passes reforms allowing President Nayib Bukele indefinite reelection and extending terms to six years amid opposition outcry.

"Democracy in El Salvador has died! – Marcela Villatoro, Nationalist Republican Alliance"

San Salvador, August 1

The ruling party of El Salvador President Nayib Bukele has passed sweeping constitutional reforms that allow indefinite presidential reelection and extend presidential terms from five to six years, France 24 reported.

The constitutional amendments, proposed by Ana Figueroa of the ruling New Ideas party, were swiftly approved in the National Assembly on Thrusday (local time) where Bukele's party holds a supermajority. The vote passed with 57 lawmakers in favor and only three opposed.

According to France 24, the changes affect five articles of the constitution and also eliminate the need for a second-round runoff in presidential elections. "All of them have had the possibility of reelection through popular vote, the only exception until now has been the presidency," Figueroa told lawmakers while justifying the reforms, referring to legislators and mayors who already have the right to unlimited reelection.

In a key move that could accelerate Bukele's political future, Figueroa also proposed cutting short the president's current term--originally ending June 1, 2029--to June 1, 2027. The shift would align presidential and congressional elections and allow Bukele to run for a longer six-year term two years earlier.

The opposition criticized the move as a blow to El Salvador's democratic institutions. Marcela Villatoro of the Nationalist Republican Alliance (Arena), one of the three lawmakers who voted against the proposal, declared, "Democracy in El Salvador has died!" She warned, "You don't realize what indefinite reelection brings: It brings an accumulation of power and weakens democracy ... there's corruption and clientelism because nepotism grows and halts democracy and political participation."

Bukele, who won reelection last year despite a previous constitutional ban, was able to run again after a 2021 ruling by Supreme Court justices handpicked by his party. The decision interpreted the law as permitting a second consecutive term, according to France 24.

The constitutional reforms further cement the control of Bukele, a leader who once described himself as "the world's coolest dictator." Though he has faced criticism over alleged negotiations with gangs and the erosion of civil liberties during a state of emergency, his popularity remains high due to his aggressive crackdown on violent street gangs.

"Power has returned to the only place that it truly belongs ... to the Salvadoran people," said Suecy Callejas, the assembly's vice president, defending the changes.

France 24 noted that Bukele did not issue an immediate comment on the passage of the reforms. His leadership style has attracted interest in the region, with several politicians seeking to emulate his strongman image and law-and-order governance.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
But if the people genuinely want a leader, shouldn't they have the right to re-elect them? Modi ji has been good for India, why should there be artificial limits if people support him? 🤔
A
Aditya G
As an Indian watching this, it reminds me of Indira Gandhi's Emergency era. Constitutional changes for personal power never end well. Democracy needs checks and balances!
S
Sarah B
Interesting to see this happening in Latin America. In India we've seen how regional parties create family dynasties. Maybe term limits are better than indefinite rule, whether by individuals or families?
K
Karthik V
The way they changed Supreme Court judges reminds me of what happened in some Indian states. Judiciary must remain independent! Otherwise it's just dictatorship with elections. 😟
N
Nisha Z
If the leader is reducing crime and developing the country, maybe people don't mind longer rule? But the danger is what happens when a bad leader gets this power. Very tricky situation!

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50