Key Points

The ECI has reported no formal complaints from political parties regarding Bihar's voter roll revision, despite public criticism. Over 28,000 individual claims have been filed, with BJP leading in Booth Level Agent appointments. First-time voters submitted 103,703 applications, highlighting active public participation. The ECI emphasized strict verification before any voter name removal.

Key Points: ECI Reports Zero Complaints Despite Opposition Criticism of Bihar Voter Roll Revision

  • ECI confirms zero formal complaints from political parties
  • Individual voters submit 28,370 inclusion/exclusion requests
  • BJP leads with 53,338 Booth Level Agents
  • 103,703 first-time voter applications received
2 min read

ECI reports zero complaints by political parties; 28,370 voter claims filed

ECI reveals no formal complaints from political parties amid Bihar voter roll revision, while individual voters file 28,370 claims.

"No name can be deleted from the draft rolls without a formal speaking order. – ECI"

New Delhi, Aug 15

Despite sustained criticism from Opposition parties over the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, the Election Commission of India (ECI) has reported that it has not received a single formal complaint from any political party regarding claims and objections to the draft rolls.

In contrast, the ECI said, individual voters have submitted 28,370 applications for inclusion or exclusion.

According to the ECI’s daily bulletin on August 15 -- covering the period from August 1 (3 p.m.) to August 15 (9 a.m.) -- political parties have appointed 1,60,813 Booth Level Agents (BLAs). This includes 53,338 from the Bharatiya Janata Party, 47,506 from the Rashtriya Janata Dal, 36,550 from the Janata Dal (United), and 17,549 from the Indian National Congress, among others.

While no political party, including those in Opposition, has submitted claims or objections, individual electors have filed 28,370 such requests. Of these, 857 have already been disposed of following the mandatory verification period.

The Commission also received 1,03,703 applications from first-time voters aged 18 and above, including six routed through BLAs.

The ECI reiterated that claims and objections are adjudicated by the respective Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) or Assistant Electoral Registration Officers (AEROs) only after a seven-day verification process. Crucially, no name can be deleted from the draft rolls published on August 1 without a formal “speaking order” issued after due inquiry and providing the concerned individual an opportunity to be heard.

The absence of formal party complaints stands in sharp contrast to the repeated public accusations by Opposition leaders alleging bias and procedural lapses in voter roll management. The data indicate that while parties are actively engaging in the revision process through their BLAs, they have not formally contested the fairness of the exercise before the ECI.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Shreya B
As a first-time voter from Patna, I submitted my application online and it was processed smoothly. The system works if you follow proper procedure. Politicians should stop misleading people with baseless allegations 🙄
A
Aman W
The huge number of BLAs appointed shows parties are actively monitoring the process. Maybe they found no genuine issues to complain about? Or is there pressure not to file complaints? Either way, citizens seem more proactive than politicians!
P
Priyanka N
While ECI's data looks good, I wish they would make the verification process faster. My uncle's name correction took 12 days when they promise 7-day processing. Small improvements needed in ground implementation.
V
Varun X
Typical Indian politics - lots of noise in media but no formal complaints. Shows opposition has no real issues, just creating confusion before elections. ECI should be commended for maintaining integrity despite pressure.
N
Nisha Z
Over 1 lakh new voters registered! This is fantastic for democracy. Young India is participating actively. Maybe political parties should focus more on actual governance issues than imaginary voter list problems 🤷‍♀️

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50