Key Points

Jaishankar delivered a scathing rebuttal to Congress' China criticism during a Parliament session. He mocked Jairam Ramesh's 'Chindia' concept while detailing Congress-era collaborations with China and Pakistan. The EAM contrasted his 41-year diplomatic experience with opposition leaders' alleged Chinese connections. His remarks sparked both laughter and protests, marking another fiery exchange in ongoing India-China policy debates.

Key Points: Jaishankar Mocks Jairam Ramesh as China Guru in Parliament Clash

  • Jaishankar ridicules Ramesh's 2007 'Chindia' book concept
  • Cites Congress-era China-Pak nuclear collaboration in 1976
  • Accuses opposition of historical ignorance on PoK
  • Highlights India's UNSC win declaring TRF as terrorist entity
4 min read

EAM Jaishankar jibes at 'China guru' Jairam Ramesh, says he spent 41 years in Foreign Service

EAM Jaishankar taunts Congress' Jairam Ramesh over his 'Chindia' stance, citing 41 years of diplomatic experience vs 'private tuitions' from Chinese Ambassador.

"I have spent 41 years in the Foreign Service... but there are 'China Gurus' - S Jaishankar"

New Delhi, July 30

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Wednesday hit out at the Opposition benches in Parliament, taking a dig at "China guru" Jairam Ramesh, and other Congress leaders opining about the relationship between India and its neighbours.

"I have spent 41 years in the Foreign Service, only been the longest-serving Ambassador, but there are 'China Gurus'. One of them is the member sitting in front of me (Jairam Ramesh), whose affection for China is so great, 'unhone ek sandhi bana li thi India aur China ki, Chindia' (they have conjoined India and China, Chindia)," Jaishankar said during his address in Parliament.

Continuing his jibe, Jaishankar said that while he may lack knowledge about China, he did not learn about the country through Olympics, unlike others who took "private tuitions" at the home of the Chinese Ambassador.

The word 'Chindia' was used by Congress leader Jairam Ramesh in his book 'Making sense of Chindia: Reflections on China and India," published in 2007.

The remarks by the EAM made during the discussion on Operation Sindoor were met by first laughter from the treasury benches sitting behind him, followed by loud protests from the Opposition benches.

"I may lack knowledge about China because I did not learn about China through the Olympics, no one called me, I was not a special person. Some people gained their knowledge of China during their visit to the Olympics. Let's not discuss who they met or what they signed. They also took private tuitions at their homes from the Chinese Ambassador," Jaishankar continued.

Jaishankar detailed the history of collaboration between the two nations. He mentioned the 1966 plan for India-Pakistan Karokoram highway, nuclear collaboration in 1976, among other things, all of which happened during Congress-led governments.

"'China Gurus' say that Pakistan and China have close ties, that is true. But how did they come close? What is the reason? It was because in the middle we had left PoK. This issue has been happening since 1962 and 1963 (since India-China war) Karokoram highway's planning started in 1966 and finished in 1986. You know who's government was there.whrn Nuclear collaboration happened in 1976?" he stated.

"In 1980, when India's PM was going to Pakistan and saying a deal would happen, the talks between China and Pakistan were going on. However, saying that these ties developed overnight means they were sleeping during the history class," he added.

Congress leader Jairam Ramesh has repeatedly criticised the Centre over the handling of its relationship with China. The Congress leader had in March also demanded a debate on the issue.

More recently, on July 4, the Congress leader also told ANI that there was "China's influence over Pakistan's Air Force," while India and Pakistan had become increasingly hostile in May after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack.

"Today, it is proven that we were not fighting Pakistani Air Force, this was with China. China has totally captured the Pakistani Air Force. That is why Congress is repeatedly demanding a discussion on it. For five years, we have been asking; when the situation was bad and the PM also gave a clean chit to China that no one has come in and is sitting on our land," Jairam Ramesh said.

EAM Jaishankar also mentioned during his speech that Indian diplomacy had succeeded in getting the UNSC Monitoring Team to accept that the Resistance Front (TRF) is a terrorist entity.

He highlighted the UNSC report and said that in the last decade, Indian diplomacy with regards to terrorism has seen a huge leap.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
While I support our EAM, I wish political debates could be more constructive. Both sides should focus on current challenges rather than digging up past mistakes. China is a serious threat we must unite against.
A
Aditya G
"Chindia" concept was always foolish. China never saw us as equals. Jaishankar's experience shows - he knows how to handle dragon diplomacy. Congress should stop living in fantasy land!
S
Sarah B
As an NRI watching from Canada, I'm impressed by Jaishankar's articulate defense of India's position. But the personal jibes diminish the seriousness of the China threat. Hope Parliament can rise above politics on national security issues.
K
Kavya N
Funny how Congress suddenly remembers China threat before elections! For 10 years they mocked Modi govt's foreign policy. Now they want discussions? Hypocrisy ki bhi seema hoti hai! 😂
N
Nikhil C
The UNSC recognition of TRF as terrorist group is big win for Indian diplomacy. This is what happens when we have professionals like Jaishankar handling foreign policy instead of politicians with personal agendas.
M
Meera T
While I disagree with Congress's China policy, name-calling in Parliament sets bad precedent. Our leaders should debate policies, not personalities. China

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50