Thu, 11 Jun 2026 · LIVE
Updated Aug 26, 2025 · 17:25
Education News Updated Aug 26, 2025

DU's Rs 1 lakh bond requirement for DUSU polls sparks protests from student organisations

Student organisations are up in arms against Delhi University's new Rs 1 lakh bond requirement for DUSU election candidates. The ABVP staged protests at the Arts Faculty, joined by students from various colleges. Multiple student groups argue this bond is anti-democratic and restricts participation to wealthy candidates. The university implemented this measure to prevent campus defacement during election campaigns.

New Delhi, Aug 26

The Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), the student wing of the RSS, on Tuesday staged a protest at Delhi University’s Arts Faculty against the administration’s decision to mandate a Rs 1 lakh electoral bond for candidates contesting the Delhi University Students’ Union (DUSU) elections.

Students from the Ramjas College, the Hindu College, the Kirori Mal College, Miranda House, and other institutions joined the protest, demanding immediate withdrawal of the decision.

Calling the decision "anti-student" and "discriminatory", the ABVP said the bond would restrict the elections to only affluent candidates, undermining the democratic spirit of student politics.

"While the Lyngdoh Committee caps election expenditure at Rs 5,000, asking students to deposit a bond of Rs 1 lakh is illogical and undemocratic," said ABVP Delhi state Secretary Sarthak Sharma.

He warned that if the university does not revoke the decision, the agitation will escalate "from the streets to the courts".

The All India Students Association (AISA), affiliated to Left parties, has already moved the Delhi High Court against the DU’s decision to mandate a Rs 1 lakh bond for candidates contesting elections to the DUSU.

It contended that the bond provision contravenes the Lyngdoh Committee recommendations, according to which there should be minimal expenses in such elections.

The Delhi University administration recently issued a notification that requires the candidates to sign the bond as a preventive measure for the 2025-26 DUSU polls, arguing that it would help curb poster defacement during campaigns. The decision was taken due to last year’s controversy regarding the defacement of public properties inside the DU campus.

Last year, the Delhi Court had criticised the university over defacement of the campus during the students' union elections and stalled the results until defacement material, including posters, hoardings, and graffiti, was removed from public property.

This time, after the DU administration’s decision of a Rs 1 lakh bond, student groups, including the ABVP, the Congress-affiliated NSUI, the CPI-M-affiliated SFI, and others, are up in arms, condemning the move, saying it goes against the basic spirit of democracy and will unfairly benefit wealthy candidates.

— IANS

Reader Comments

Priya S

While I understand the need to prevent defacement, this solution is completely disproportionate. There are better ways to maintain campus cleanliness without excluding ordinary students from participating in democracy.

Vikram M

Lyngdoh Committee clearly caps expenses at ₹5000. DU administration is violating its own guidelines. This bond requirement makes no sense and should be challenged legally.

Sarah B

As an international student at DU, I'm shocked by this decision. Student politics should be accessible to all, not just those from wealthy backgrounds. This sets a terrible precedent.

Rohit P

Finally all student organizations are united against this nonsense! ABVP, NSUI, SFI, AISA - everyone agrees this is wrong. When did that last happen? 😄

Michael C

The administration could have implemented a refundable deposit of a reasonable amount. ₹1 lakh is excessive and clearly aimed at restricting student participation. Hope the court intervenes.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked