New York, September 24
The United Nations General Assembly's annual General Debate continued into its second day on Wednesday, with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy closing his brief remarks with a sharp appeal to the UN for action.
Pointing out that many nations in the hall are "at war or just came out of war, or are trying to stop one or openly getting ready for one war," Zelenskyy said it rests with those before him to decide whether Russia's aggression in Ukraine will be brought to an end.
"Yesterday, we had a good meeting with President Trump, and I also spoke with many other strong leaders, and together, we can change a lot.... I appreciate the support we are receiving," he said.
He stressed that while the G7 and G20 play important roles, responsibility ultimately lies with the entire UN membership.
"Yes, much depends on the G7 and G20 but, but in the end, this depends on all of us, on the United Nations. So don't stay silent while Russia keeps dragging this war on. Please speak out and condemn it. Please join us in defending life and international law and order. People are waiting for action," he said.
Earlier in his address, Zelenskyy used his opening remarks to question the relevance of the UN in addressing global crises.
He asked, "What can anyone living through war really expect from the UN or the global system for decades? Just statements and statements." He pointed to Gaza, Syria, and the Russia-Ukraine conflicts, where the international community had failed to provide adequate support.
The Ukrainian leader underscored that the decisive factor in the war with Russia would be weapons rather than legal frameworks. "If a nation wants peace, it still has to work on weapons. It's sick, but that's the reality," he said. "Not international law, not cooperation. Weapons decide who survives."
His comments came as Ukraine continued to face obstacles in securing approved military assistance from the United States. Zelenskyy also expressed visible frustration with the structure of the UN Security Council, where Russia holds permanent membership and veto power.
"International law doesn't work fully, unless you have powerful friends who are truly willing to stand up for it," he added.
Russia has frequently exercised this veto authority to block resolutions on its war in Ukraine as well as the humanitarian crisis in Sudan. Historically, Moscow and its predecessor, the Soviet Union, have resorted to the veto more often than any other permanent member.
— ANI
Reader Comments
While I sympathize with Ukraine, India must maintain its strategic autonomy. We have our own border concerns with China. Getting involved in distant conflicts isn't practical when we need to focus on our national security first.
The UN system is clearly broken when aggressors can veto resolutions against themselves. Zelenskyy's frustration is understandable. Hope India can play a constructive role in finding diplomatic solutions while protecting its own interests.
"Weapons decide who survives" - this is the harsh truth that smaller nations understand well. Look at what happened to Ukraine when they gave up their nukes. India's nuclear deterrent has served us well in maintaining sovereignty. 💪
Respectfully, while Zelenskyy makes valid points about UN reform, his statement about weapons over international law is concerning. As a democracy, India has always believed in rules-based order. Military might shouldn't replace diplomacy entirely.
The common people suffer the most in these wars. India has handled the Ukraine situation wisely - balancing humanitarian aid while protecting our energy and fertilizer imports. Hope peace talks resume soon. ðŸ™
This war has shown how interconnected the world economy is. Our inflation problems were partly due to this conflict. Global institutions need to be more
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.