Key Points

Pakistan is turning to the United States for financial and military support after feeling exploited by its longtime ally China. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor has buried Islamabad under a massive $29 billion debt to Beijing, forcing it to seek IMF bailouts. To make matters worse, Chinese-supplied weapons systems proved ineffective during recent conflicts with India, failing to protect key assets. This strategic shift back towards Washington is causing significant alarm in Beijing, which views the relationship as crucial to its Indian Ocean ambitions.

Key Points: Pakistan Seeks US Weapons After China CPEC Debt and Failed Arms

  • Pakistan owes China $29 billion in bilateral debt from CPEC projects
  • Chinese weapons failed against India in recent conflict, prompting a US pivot
  • IMF approved a $7 billion bailout package for Pakistan's $130B external debt
  • Baloch Liberation Army attacks Chinese targets over resource exploitation in Gwadar
3 min read

Ditched by unreliable Chinese weapons and CPEC, Pakistan cosying up to US: Report

Report reveals Pakistan's $29B debt to China and unreliable weapons are pushing it back to the US for financial bailouts and military support, alarming Beijing.

"Chinese weapon systems... could not prevent Indian attacks on terrorist camps and strategic airfields deep in Pakistan - Maldives Insight Report"

Islamabad, Sep 3

The real reason why Pakistan is trying to cosy up to the United States seems to be money and weapons, in both of which it has been badly ditched by China, a report has highlighted.

Pakistan, a Maldives Insight report cited, has realised that China has been exploiting it through its China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) project and giving them Chinese weapons system of questionable efficacy.

"Under the CPEC, Pakistan has run up a huge debt to Beijing. Now Islamabad has little option but to approach the International Monetary Fund, controlled by Washington, for bailout packages to meet its external debt repayment obligations. In 2024, China was the largest bilateral creditor of Pakistan; with Islamabad’s debt liability to Beijing being USD 29 billion. The International Debt report of World Bank for 2024 put the total external debt of Pakistan at USD 130 billion," it stated.

In 2024, Pakistan was among the top three loan recipients from the IMF. The IMF has worked out a USD 7 billion bailout package for Pakistan. On May 9, the IMF Executive Board sanctioned the disbursement of USD 1 billion under the Extended Fund Facility of the IMF out of this package amount.

However, the report mentioned that Pakistani people have not benefited through CPEC projects with power tariffs remaining very high as Chinese companies charge even for unused capacity in power plants. At the same time, Pakistani fishermen have been deprived of their fishing reserves at Gwadar Port. Furthermore, the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) has launched an offensive against Chinese nationals present in Pakistan and Pakistani security forces to protest China's exploitation of the resources of Balochistan with the help of the Pakistani establishment.

According to the report, US President Donald Trump, during his first term, suspended military assistance to Pakistan on the ground that it had failed to act against Afghan Taliban and Haqqani Network terror modules who were using Pakistani soil to carry out depredations in Afghanistan. Since then, Pakistan had become increasingly reliant on China for military equipment.

"But, in Pakistan’s recent short war with India, Chinese weapon systems like HQ-9 and HQ-16 Surface to Air Missiles and J-10C and JF-17 fighter aircraft could not prevent Indian attacks on terrorist camps and strategic airfields deep in Pakistan, nor could they inflict any major damage on Indian installations. Islamabad is now under pressure to run to the US once again for the supply of reliable weapon systems," the report titled 'Beijing alarmed over upswing in US–Pakistan relationship' detailed.

It further stated that Beijing is keeping a "close watch" on Islamabad’s growing bonhomie with Washington, sensing that this may cause a fissure in its ironclad relationship with Beijing. Immediately after a visit to New Delhi last month, the Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi had rushed to Islamabad to attend the Pakistan–China Strategic Dialogue to review the all-weather ties between both countries.

"Learning from experience, Beijing cannot afford this relationship to develop. America is sensitive over Chinese military presence at Gwadar Port. Yielding to Washington’s pressure, Islamabad did not allow the Chinese Navy to make a port call at Gwadar during the joint naval Sea Guardians III exercise between the two countries in November 2023. Setting up a military base at Gwadar to establish its influence in the Indian Ocean region is the ultimate goal Beijing wants to attain through the CPEC," it added.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The CPEC was always a colonial project in disguise. Chinese companies charging for unused power capacity while ordinary Pakistanis suffer? Shameful. Hope they realize true friends don't exploit you like this.
A
Aditya G
Chinese weapons failing during conflict doesn't surprise me. Their equipment is often overhyped. Pakistan's military should focus on indigenous development rather than depending on unreliable partners.
M
Michael C
From a strategic perspective, this shifting alignment shows how geopolitical relationships are purely transactional. Pakistan's desperation highlights the failure of their China-first policy. Interesting times ahead in South Asia.
S
Shreya B
The Baloch people's suffering under CPEC is often ignored. Their resources being exploited while getting nothing in return. This report finally acknowledges their struggle. Hope international community takes note.
V
Vikram M
$29 billion debt to China! That's astronomical. No wonder they're running to IMF. This should serve as a lesson to all developing nations about Chinese "investment" - it's actually debt slavery.
R
Robert G
As an observer, it's clear that Pakistan's foreign policy lacks consistency. Jumping from US to China and back again shows they prioritize short-term gains over long-term strategic partnerships. Not a sustainable approach.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50