Key Points

The Delhi High Court has sought the Boxing Federation of India’s response to a petition challenging its August 21 elections. The Delhi Amateur Boxing Federation alleges the polls violate rules and bypass mandatory procedures. The BFI defends its new constitution, claiming widespread support from state units and global approval. The legal tussle adds to the ongoing turmoil in Indian boxing administration.

Key Points: Delhi HC Seeks BFI Reply on Plea Challenging August 21 Boxing Polls

  • Delhi HC schedules August 18 hearing on DABF plea against BFI elections
  • Petitioners allege AGM bypass and rule violations in poll process
  • BFI claims new constitution backed by 30 state units and World Boxing
  • Interim Committee accuses four associations of pushing unelected political figures
3 min read

Delhi HC seeks Boxing Federation of India's reply on plea challenging Aug 21 polls; hearing set for Aug 18

Delhi High Court questions BFI elections after DABF petition alleges rule violations, hearing set for August 18.

"The new constitution has support from 30 of 34 state associations and World Boxing’s endorsement – BFI Interim Committee"

New Delhi, August 7

The Delhi High Court has issued notices to the Boxing Federation of India (BFI) and the central government following a petition by the Delhi Amateur Boxing Federation (DABF), seeking direction to halt the BFI elections slated for August 21.

Justice Mini Pushkarna heard the matter on Thursday and scheduled it for final arguments on August 18. The court also clarified that any elections held before that date would be contingent on the outcome of the writ petition.

The petition contests the legitimacy of a circular issued on August 1 by BFI's Interim Committee, which announced the election timeline and introduced revised BFI Rules and Regulations via email. According to the petitioner, these decisions were made without convening the mandatory Annual General Meeting (AGM) and in breach of a previous High Court directive dated March 19.

The DABF has urged that the elections be conducted under the existing BFI constitution and overseen by the returning officer who was appointed prior to the dispute. It has also requested a suspension of the August 1 circular's implementation.

The petitioners, comprising boxing associations from Delhi, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, have accused the Interim Committee of undemocratically enforcing a new constitution, issuing an unauthorised election notice, and replacing the returning officer without impartiality or due procedure.

They argue that these actions lack legal foundation and transparency, undermining the integrity of the electoral process and violating the principles of democratic governance in sports.

In defence, the BFI's Interim Committee stated through its legal counsel that the new constitution has received support from 30 of the 34 affiliated state associations and has been formally endorsed by World Boxing, the sport's global authority.

The counsel further claimed that opposition is limited to four associations allegedly attempting to install unelected individuals, including political figures, into influential roles within the federation. The Sports Ministry, the council stated, has emphasised that no one should be arbitrarily placed in sports administration, regardless of their stature.

This legal battle is the latest chapter in a prolonged internal struggle within the BFI, which began after the previous leadership's term ended on February 2, 2025. Elections originally scheduled for March 28 were postponed due to legal disputes and internal divisions. Tensions escalated when the designated Returning Officer, former Delhi High Court judge R.K. Gauba, resigned amid accusations of a defamation campaign.

To stabilise the situation, World Boxing appointed an Interim Committee in April 2025 to manage daily affairs and later set an August 31 deadline for conducting fresh elections to restore normalcy within the Federation.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Shreya B
If 30/34 state associations support the new constitution, why are we delaying elections? This just hurts our athletes. The minority shouldn't hold the sport hostage. #LetBoxingMoveForward
A
Aman W
The real victims here are our young boxers who train hard while administrators play power games. Remember when Mary Kom had to fight both opponents AND federation politics? Same old story continues...
N
Nikhil C
Respectfully disagree with Interim Committee's approach. Changing constitution via email? Really? Even my housing society follows better procedures for amendments. Court intervention is necessary here.
P
Priyanka N
As someone from Delhi sports circles, I know DABF has valid concerns. The sudden replacement of returning officer smells fishy. Hope HC cleans up this mess before it affects Olympic preparations! 🤞
K
Karan T
Why can't we have independent election commission for all sports federations? Politicians and bureaucrats ruin everything they touch. Look at cricket - BCCI is no better despite all the money.
M
Michael C
Watching from UK - this is exactly why India struggles in Olympics. Too much energy spent on administration battles instead of athlete development. Hope court brings some sanity.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50