Chirag Paswan Slams Opposition: Why Parliament Ruckus Is a "Flawed Approach"

The Winter Session of Parliament descended into chaos with loud Opposition protests. Union Minister Chirag Paswan sharply criticized these disruptions, calling them a flawed approach that goes against democratic tradition. The protests centered on allegations of electoral malpractice in Bihar and a voter list revision exercise. With neither side backing down, the session looks poised for more confrontations.

Key Points: Chirag Paswan Criticizes Opposition for Disrupting Parliament Proceedings

  • Winter Session adjourned twice as Opposition protested alleged "vote theft" in Bihar polls
  • Paswan claims many Opposition MPs privately disagree with the obstructionist tactics
  • Deputy Speaker warned adjournment was inevitable amid unrelenting sloganeering
  • Both sides appear dug in, setting stage for repeated parliamentary faceoffs
3 min read

Creating ruckus in Parliament is a flawed approach: Chirag Paswan hits out at Oppn

Union Minister Chirag Paswan calls Opposition's Parliament disruptions a flawed democratic approach, as Winter Session faces repeated adjournments over electoral roll protests.

"If your sole aim is just to create a ruckus, then this is a flawed approach. - Chirag Paswan"

New Delhi, Dec 1

Union Food Processing Industries Minister Chirag Paswan lashed out at the Opposition for obstructing the Parliamentary proceedings and called it a "flawed approach".

The Winter Session of Lok Sabha plunged into turmoil on Monday as vociferous protests by the Opposition over alleged "vote chori" in the recently concluded Bihar Assembly elections and the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls across several states and union territories, forced a second adjournment of the day till 2 p.m.

Paswan said that the ruckus being created in the Parliament by the Opposition is against democratic traditions and is not liked by many of its own members.

Speaking to IANS, Paswan said, "Dialogue is not being allowed, and an environment of obstruction is being created. This is against the tradition of a proper democracy. You (Opposition) also have MPs in your party, people who want to voice their opinions, and many of them, if you talk to them, would not agree with the way obstructions are being carried out."

"During question hour, they have to raise their issues, but creating obstruction in this manner goes against democratic tradition. If your (Opposition's) sole aim is just to create a ruckus, then this is a flawed approach," he added.

The Lower House had reconvened at noon after a brief and stormy sitting from 11 a.m. Within minutes, Opposition MPs rushed into the Well of the House, raising thunderous slogans of "Vote Chor, Gaddi Chhor!" and waving placards demanding an immediate discussion on what they called a "conspiracy to delete genuine voters" through the SIR exercise.

Deputy Speaker Sandhya Rai, presiding over the proceedings, repeatedly urged the members to return to their seats.

She assured the House that none of the more than 20 adjournment motion notices submitted by the Opposition had been rejected by the Speaker and that the issues could be taken up if the House was allowed to function.

Her appeals, however, went unheeded amid the unrelenting din.

As the sloganeering only grew louder, an exasperated Deputy Speaker warned that she would be compelled to adjourn the House.

She asked them, "Why do you not want to run the zero hour?"

When calm did not return, she finally rose and announced adjournment till 2 p.m.

With both sides digging in -- the Opposition adamant on not letting the House run without a debate on electoral malpractice and the treasury benches determined to push ahead with legislative business -- the Winter Session 2025 appears set for repeated faceoffs.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Shreya B
But what about the issue they are raising? If there are genuine concerns about voter list manipulation, shouldn't that be discussed on priority? Disruption is wrong, but so is ignoring serious allegations. 🤔
A
Aman W
This is so frustrating to watch as a citizen. Both sides need to grow up. The government should allow a discussion, and the opposition should behave. Our democracy deserves better than this tamasha.
P
Priya S
I agree with the Minister. There is a time and place for everything. Question Hour is meant for raising issues. Creating a ruckus just shows they have no solid arguments to present. Let the House function!
V
Vikram M
The Deputy Speaker gave a clear assurance that notices weren't rejected. Why not use the proper channel? This feels more like a strategy to stay in the headlines than a genuine attempt to solve the issue. Very disappointing.
K
Karthik V
With respect to Mr. Paswan, I must point out that the treasury benches have also been guilty of similar disruptions in the past when they were in opposition. This is a systemic disease in our politics, not just one side's fault. We need permanent solutions.
N
Nisha Z
The core issue is about voters! If names are being deleted unfairly, it's a direct attack on democracy.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50