Key Points

Congress MP Tariq Anwar has raised concerns about his party's participation in diplomatic missions following Operation Sindoor. He argues that the government should have consulted Parliament and the Opposition before sending delegations abroad. While some Congress leaders like Shashi Tharoor and Anand Sharma support the operation, Anwar believes the party should have reconsidered its involvement. The statement highlights ongoing tensions between the ruling party and the Opposition regarding national security communication.

Key Points: Tariq Anwar Criticizes Congress Diplomatic Mission Participation

  • Congress MP challenges diplomatic missions without parliamentary consultation
  • Internal party disagreement over Operation Sindoor
  • Criticism of government's approach to national security briefings
  • Calls for more transparent communication with Opposition
3 min read

Congress should have reconsidered joining diplomatic missions, says party MP Tariq Anwar

Congress MP Tariq Anwar questions party's involvement in international missions after Operation Sindoor, calls for government transparency

"Until the ruling party changes its confrontational attitude toward the Opposition, it's important we think before extending support - Tariq Anwar"

New Delhi, May 22

Amid India’s ongoing diplomatic outreach to expose Pakistan’s role in fostering terrorism following Operation Sindoor, a section of the Congress party has expressed discomfort over participating in delegations sent abroad to brief foreign governments.

Speaking to IANS, Senior Congress leader and Member of Parliament Tariq Anwar on Thursday said the party should have reconsidered its participation in these missions, especially in the absence of meaningful consultation by the government with the Opposition.

"I understand that half of the delegation has already left or is in the process of leaving. But there should have been serious deliberation on whether we should have been part of it at all,” Anwar said.

“Until the ruling party changes its confrontational attitude toward the Opposition, it’s important we think before extending support,” he added.

Anwar also questioned the government’s decision to mount an international campaign on Operation Sindoor without first taking Parliament or an all-party meeting into confidence.

“It makes little sense for the government to send delegations abroad to showcase the legitimacy of the operation when there has been no detailed briefing to the elected representatives of the country. There should have been a special Parliament session or at least an all-party meeting to share information and build a national consensus,” he argued.

Responding to queries on comments by Congress leaders like Anand Sharma, Salman Khurshid, and Shashi Tharoor who publicly supported Operation Sindoor and diplomatic missions in the aftermath, Anwar said, “There is no question of doubting the bravery of our armed forces. Everyone in the Congress, including me, has praised the courage and professionalism of our soldiers. But when we ask the government for transparency or information, we are branded as anti-national or agents of Pakistan. That’s the contradiction -- on one hand, we are insulted, and on the other, asked to represent the country abroad.”

Shiv Sena leader Sanjay Nirupam lashed out at Congress, calling it a “fractured party lacking internal coherence".

“Shashi Tharoor, Salman Khurshid, and Anand Sharma have rightly praised Operation Sindoor and acknowledged its strategic importance. The Army acted swiftly, taking out nine terrorist camps across the border. The limited nature of the mission prevented a wider war, which is in the country’s best interest,” Nirupam told IANS.

He further added that the armed forces had "avenged the massacre of Hindu pilgrims in Pahalgam", noting that key terrorist figures, including the brother of Maulana Masood Azhar, were eliminated during the precision strikes.

“This operation was executed in under 25 minutes -- a remarkable feat. Anyone questioning this bravery is doing a disservice to the nation and giving Pakistan a morale boost,” he said.

BJP leader Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi also criticised the Congress, accusing it of sending “mixed signals” on matters related to national security. “The Congress has developed a habit of creating confusion -- even within its own ranks. National security is not an issue to play politics with. Their flip-flops damage the country’s united stance against terrorism,” Naqvi told IANS.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rahul K.
Why is Congress always creating confusion on national security matters? When our brave soldiers conduct successful operations, the entire nation should stand united. This internal bickering only helps Pakistan's narrative. 🇮🇳
P
Priya M.
While I support the government's actions against terrorism, Mr. Anwar makes a valid point about parliamentary consultation. Democracy isn't just about elections - it's about transparency in governance too. The opposition deserves to be taken into confidence on such sensitive matters.
A
Arjun S.
Operation Sindoor was a surgical strike on terror infrastructure, not a political event. Our forces deserve unconditional support. Congress should stop this "yes, but..." approach. Either stand with India or don't - no half measures when it comes to national security!
S
Sunita R.
The mixed signals from Congress are worrying. On one side leaders praise the operation, on other side they question participation in diplomatic missions. This confusion only weakens India's position internationally. Need more coherence in opposition's foreign policy stance.
V
Vikram J.
As someone who lost family in the 26/11 attacks, I say enough is enough with Pakistan's terror factories. Whether Congress joins or not, India must keep exposing Pakistan's role globally. Our soldiers' sacrifices demand nothing less.
N
Neha P.
The government could have handled this better by calling an all-party meeting first. But Congress' reaction seems more about scoring political points than genuine concern. When will our politicians learn that national interest comes before party politics?
K
Karan D.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50