NewKerala.com Logo

Congress flags 'systematic targeting' of Supreme Court after BJP MP's remarks

IANS April 19, 2025 321 views

The ongoing tension between the Congress and BJP has escalated with serious allegations about judicial independence. Jairam Ramesh strongly criticized the ruling party for attempting to undermine the Supreme Court's constitutional role. The controversy stems from a BJP MP's provocative comments about the court's legislative review powers. The dispute centers on the Supreme Court's recent scrutiny of government actions, including the Waqf Act amendment and electoral bonds case.

"If the Supreme Court is going to make the laws, then the Parliament building should be shut down." - Nishikant Dubey, BJP MP"
New Delhi, April 19: The Congress on Saturday accused the BJP of ‘attempting to weaken the authority of the Supreme Court’, following controversial remarks by BJP MP Nishikant Dubey amid the court's ongoing review of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025.

Key Points

1

Congress alleges coordinated BJP attempt to weaken Supreme Court's constitutional authority

2

Judicial independence under threat in Modi's governance

3

Supreme Court reviewing controversial Waqf Amendment Act

4

BJP MP makes controversial remarks against judicial oversight

Congress leader Jairam Ramesh came out strongly against the ruling party, stating that the BJP is targeting the judiciary because it has held the government accountable on key constitutional matters.

“They are trying to weaken the Supreme Court,” Ramesh told reporters. “The BJP is actively undermining the powers granted to the apex court by the Constitution, especially because the court has called out the government on issues like electoral bonds and the Waqf matter.”

Earlier in the day, Dubey’s comments stirred controversy after he posted on social media: "If the Supreme Court is going to make the laws, then the Parliament building should be shut down." Though cryptic, the message was widely seen as a direct attack on the judiciary’s oversight of legislative matters.

Ramesh asserted that ministers and MPs from the BJP are intentionally targeting the judiciary. “Constitutional functionaries and BJP leaders are attacking the Supreme Court simply because it is upholding the basic structure doctrine. This is a coordinated attempt to erode judicial independence,” he said.

Ramesh also highlighted the court’s actions on other key issues -- including the electoral bonds case and the pending matter concerning the autonomy of the Election Commission -- to argue that the “BJP’s frustration with judicial scrutiny is growing”. “This is not about one law,” he said. “It’s about whether constitutional checks and balances will survive in Modi’s India,” he added.

Reaffirming his party’s stance, Ramesh said the Congress supports a judiciary that is fully independent, impartial, and empowered under the Constitution. “We want a Supreme Court that is fearless and functions without interference. What's happening now is a systematic attempt to silence that independence.”

The remarks come as the Supreme Court is hearing several petitions challenging the constitutionality of the amended Waqf Act, which was passed earlier this month. The petitioners have objected to provisions allowing non-Muslims to be included in Waqf Boards and permitting the declassification of ‘Waqf-by-user’ properties -- arguing that such changes infringe upon religious and property rights.

During the hearings, the Supreme Court took note of key commitments made by the Centre. The government assured that no non-Muslim appointments would be made to Waqf Boards or Councils until the matter is resolved. It also promised that 'Waqf-by-user' properties would not be denotified and that District Collectors would not alter their status during the interim period.

The apex court has granted the Centre one week to file a preliminary response, along with supporting documents. The next hearing in the case is scheduled for May 5.

Reader Comments

P
Priya K.
The Supreme Court has been our last line of defense for constitutional rights. If politicians start undermining it, where does that leave democracy? 😟
R
Rahul S.
While I support judicial independence, I think Congress is being hypocritical here. They've criticized SC judgments too when it suited them. All parties need to respect institutions consistently.
A
Ananya P.
Dubey's comment was completely out of line! The Supreme Court isn't "making laws" - it's interpreting them as per the Constitution. That's literally their job! 🙄
V
Vikram J.
The Waqf Act amendments seem problematic. Why rush such sensitive changes without proper debate? Glad SC is reviewing it carefully.
S
Sneha M.
This isn't about BJP vs Congress - it's about protecting our institutions! We need all parties to commit to judicial independence. The Supreme Court's checks on power are what keep our democracy alive 💙
K
Karan D.
The government's assurances in court sound reasonable. Let's wait for the final judgment before jumping to conclusions. The SC has handled sensitive matters well before.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Your email won't be published

Disclaimer: Comments are the opinions of users and not of this website or it's staff. News stories are provided by news agencies. We do not guarantee their accuracy. Inappropriate content may be removed. By posting, you agree to our terms.

You May Like!