Key Points

The Chief Justice of India expressed his shock at the recent shoe-hurling incident in the Supreme Court. A 71-year-old lawyer attempted the attack after being displeased with the CJI's remarks about a Vishnu idol case. Other judges and lawyers present strongly condemned the act as an affront to the judiciary. The court had previously declined to entertain a plea about restoring a beheaded Vishnu structure in Khajuraho temple.

Key Points: CJI Gavai Shocked by Shoe Attack Over Vishnu Idol Remarks

  • 71-year-old lawyer Rajesh Kishore attempted shoe attack on CJI-led bench
  • Attack motivated by CJI's remarks on Vishnu idol restoration case
  • Justice Bhuyan condemned incident as serious institutional affront
  • Solicitor General Tushar Mehta called act unpardonable but attacker was pardoned
2 min read

CJI Gavai says he was shocked by shoe-hurling attack

CJI BR Gavai describes shock at shoe-hurling attack by lawyer Rajesh Kishore, while Justice Bhuyan condemns the affront to judiciary's dignity.

"It's not a matter of joke, it's an affront to the institution - Justice Ujjwal Bhuyan"

New Delhi, October 9

The Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai on Thursday expressed that his brother Justice K Vinod Chandran and he were "shocked" by the shoe-hurling attempt made by a 71-year-old lawyer Rajesh Kishore on Monday. The CJI, however, also added that it is now a forgotten chapter for the Court.

The comments came while the CJI's bench was hearing an unrelated matter where Senior Advocate Gopal Sankarnarayan had appeared.

Following the CJI's comment, his brother, Justice Ujjwal Bhuyan, condemned the failed attack. Highlighting the seriousness of the incident, Justice Bhuyan said that it's not a matter of joke, it's an affront to the institution.

The Solicitor General of India (SGI), Tushar Mehta, who was also present in the Court, concurred with the view and said that the act was unpardonable. It was the CJI's magnanimity that the said attacker was pardoned by the Court, Mehta added.

The said attack occurred on Monday when the septuagenarian entered Court No. 1 and attempted to throw a shoe towards the CJI-led bench. According to the attacker, the motive behind his attack was that he was disgruntled by the CJI's remarks that were made recently during the hearing of a plea that sought restoration of a beheaded structure of Lord Vishnu in a temple in Khajuraho.

CJI Gavai had, during the hearing of the Lord Vishnu idol matter, remarked that the petitioner seeking directions to restore the idol should go and seek the remedy by praying to Lord Vishnu, as the Court declined to entertain the same.

While refusing to hear the case, the top court opined that it's a dispute over a temple, which is a protected monument under the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), suggesting that the ASI is a better authority to intervene in this regard.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rajesh Q
While I understand the emotional attachment to religious matters, taking law in your own hands is never justified. The Court was right to direct the petitioner to ASI - that's the proper channel for such matters.
S
Sarah B
The CJI's comment about praying to Lord Vishnu might have been misunderstood. Courts have to work within legal frameworks, not religious sentiments. Still, violence is never the answer.
A
Aditya G
At 71 years, the lawyer should have known better! This sets a terrible precedent. Our judiciary is the pillar of our democracy and must be protected from such incidents. 👍
M
Michael C
Respectfully, while the Court's decision to refer to ASI makes legal sense, the CJI's remark about praying to Lord Vishnu could have been more sensitive. Religious sentiments run deep in India.
N
Neha E
Security in Supreme Court needs to be reviewed. A 71-year-old managed to attempt such an act? Thankfully it failed, but this is concerning for our judges' safety. 😟

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50