Key Points

The Indian government has asked the Supreme Court to centralize petitions challenging the new Online Gaming Act of 2025. Multiple High Courts are currently examining the law's constitutional validity, with the Centre seeking to consolidate these legal challenges. The Act effectively bans real-money online games while imposing severe penalties for violations. Prime Minister Modi has highlighted the legislation's importance in protecting society from potential negative impacts of online gaming.

Key Points: Centre Seeks SC Transfer of Online Gaming Act Petitions

  • Centre urges Supreme Court to transfer gaming act petitions from multiple High Courts
  • Online Gaming Act imposes strict penalties for money gaming platforms
  • Platforms like Dream11 and Rummy Circle suspend money gaming contests
  • Law includes potential imprisonment and significant financial penalties for violations
2 min read

Centre urges SC to transfer to itself pleas against Online Gaming Act

Government moves Supreme Court to consolidate petitions challenging new Online Gaming Act's constitutional validity across multiple High Courts

"The Bill would protec t society from the negative impacts of online money games - Narendra Modi"

New Delhi, Sep 4

The Centre on Thursday urged the Supreme Court to transfer to itself petitions pending before different High Courts challenging the constitutional validity of the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025.

The newly-enacted Online Gaming Act bans all forms of real-money games in the country while regulating and promoting social, educational and esports games.

In its transfer petition, the Union government has sought transfer of the petitions pending before Delhi, Karnataka and Madhya Pradesh High Courts to the apex court to avoid multiplicity of litigation.

Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai agreed to urgently list the matter after the Centre's counsel pointed out that a petition against the Online Gaming Act is scheduled for interim orders before the Karnataka High Court.

On Wednesday, the Madhya Pradesh High Court asked the Centre to respond to a plea challenging the Online Gaming Act for allegedly violating fundamental rights by imposing a blanket ban on "online money games", including judicially-recognised skill-based games.

A week ago, the Karnataka High Court had also sought the Centre's response to a petition by Head Digital, while an online carrom platform recently moved the Delhi High Court against the law.

During the Monsoon Session, Union Electronics and IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw introduced the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025, which was cleared by both Houses of Parliament and later received the President's assent.

Under the Online Gaming Act, entities which provide such services face severe penalties. This includes a fine of up to Rs 1 crore and imprisonment of up to three years. Promoting or advertising on such platforms can also result in fines of Rs 50 lakh and a two-year jail sentence.

Following the government's move, all online money gaming platforms, including Dream11, Pokerbazi, Rummy Circle and others, have discontinued their money gaming contests.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi declared that the Bill would protect society from the negative impacts of online money games after Parliament approved it.

A day after the Lok Sabha cleared the Bill in seven minutes, the Rajya Sabha passed it in just twenty-six minutes.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
But what about skill-based games like rummy? The Supreme Court itself had declared them games of skill. This blanket ban seems excessive. The government should have created a regulatory framework instead of complete prohibition.
A
Aman W
The speed at which this bill was passed is concerning - 7 minutes in Lok Sabha? Such important legislation needs proper debate. Feels like they're rushing through without considering all aspects.
S
Sarah B
As someone working in tech, I'm worried about the job losses. These gaming companies employed thousands of Indians. The government should have thought about rehabilitation for affected employees.
V
Vikram M
Good move to transfer all cases to Supreme Court. Multiple high courts giving different judgments would create confusion. Let the apex court decide once and for all. 👍
N
Nikhil C
The penalties are too harsh! 3 years jail for running gaming platform? Meanwhile, actual criminals get bail easily. The punishment doesn't fit the crime in this case.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50