Key Points

The Centre has approved the elevation of seven judicial officers to the Gujarat High Court following recommendations from the Supreme Court Collegium. Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal announced the presidential appointment of these seven judges who will be sworn in based on their seniority. The process follows a detailed constitutional mechanism involving multiple stakeholders including the Chief Justice of India, state governors, and the law ministry. One recommended judicial officer, Rohenkumar Kundanlal Chudawala, is yet to receive final clearance.

Key Points: Centre Clears 7 Judicial Officers for Gujarat High Court

  • Supreme Court Collegium recommended eight judicial officers for appointment
  • Centre approved seven out of eight recommended names
  • Presidential approval finalizes judicial appointments
  • Follows constitutional procedure for High Court judge selection
3 min read

Centre clears elevation of 7 judicial officers as Gujarat HC judges

Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal announces appointment of seven judicial officers as Gujarat High Court judges following Supreme Court Collegium recommendation

"The President is pleased to appoint these judicial officers to the Gujarat High Court - Union Ministry of Law and Justice"

New Delhi, May 1

The Centre on Thursday cleared the appointment of seven judicial officers as Gujarat High Court judges. In a post on X, Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal announced that President has appointed judicial officers Liyakathussain Shamsuddin Pirzada, Ramchandra Thakurdas Vachhani, Jayesh Lakhanshibhai Odedra, Pranav Maheshbhai Raval, Mool Chand Tyagi, Dipak Mansukhlal Vyas, and Utkarsh Thakorbhai Desai as Gujarat HC judges.

“In exercise of the power conferred by clause (1) of Article 217 of theConstitution of India, the President is pleased to appoint S/Shri (i) Liyakathussain Shamsuddin Pirzada, (ii) Ramchandra Thakurdas Vachhani, (iii) Jayesh Lakhanshibhai Odedra, (iv) Pranav Maheshbhai Raval, (v) Mool Chand Tyagi, (vi) Dipak Mansukhlal Vyas and (vii) Utkarsh Thakorbhai Desai, to be Judges of the Gujarat High Court, in that order of seniority, with effect from the date they assume charge of their respective offices,” said a notification issued by the Union Ministry of Law and Justice.

Earlier, the Supreme Court Collegium, headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna, had recommended the appointment of eight judicial officers as Gujarat High Court judges.

"The Supreme Court Collegium in its meeting held on 19th March, 2025 has approved the proposal for appointment of the following Judicial Officers, as Judges of the High Court of Gujarat: (i) Shri Liyakathussain Shamsuddin Pirzada, (ii) Shri Ramchandra Thakurdas Vachhani, (iii) Shri Jayesh Lakhanshibhai Odedra, (iv) Shri Pranav Maheshbhai Raval, (v) Shri Mool Chand Tyagi, (vi) Shri Dipak Mansukhlal Vyas, (vii) Shri Utkarsh Thakorbhai Desai, and (viii) Shri Rohenkumar Kundanlal Chudawala," said a statement uploaded on the official website of the apex court.

However, the Centre is yet to act upon the proposal to elevate judicial officer Rohenkumar Kundanlal Chudawala to the Gujarat High Court Bench.

As per the memorandum of procedure (MoP) governing the appointment of High Court judges, the proposal for the appointment of a High Court judge should be initiated by the Chief Justice.

However, if the Chief Minister desires to recommend the name of any person, he should forward the same to the Chief Justice for his consideration.

The Governor, as advised by the Chief Minister, should forward his recommendation along with the entire set of papers to the Union Minister of Law & Justice as early as possible but not later than six weeks from the date of receipt of the proposal from the Chief Justice of the High Court.

If the comments are not received within the said time frame, it should be presumed by the Union Minister of Law & Justice that the Governor (i.e. Chief Minister) has nothing to add to the proposal and proceed accordingly.

The Union Minister of Law & Justice would consider the recommendations in light of such other reports as may be available to the government in respect of the names under consideration.

The complete material would then be forwarded to the Chief Justice of India for his advice. The Chief Justice of India would, in consultation with the two senior-most Judges of the Supreme Court, form his opinion in regard to a person to be recommended for appointment to the High Court.

After their consultations, the Chief Justice of India will, in the course of 4 weeks, send his recommendation to the Union Minister of Law & Justice.

Further, as per the MoP, as soon as the warrant of appointment is signed by the President, the Secretary of the Department of Justice will inform the Chief Justice and a copy of such communication will be sent to the Chief Minister.

He will also announce the appointment and issue necessary notification in the Gazette of India.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

Here are 6 diverse Indian perspective comments for the judicial appointments article:
R
Rajesh P.
Good to see timely appointments to the Gujarat High Court. The judiciary needs more judges to clear pending cases - our courts are overburdened. Hope these new judges will help speed up justice delivery. 🙏
P
Priya M.
Why is there delay in appointing Shri Rohenkumar Chudawala when others were cleared? The selection process should be transparent and consistent. Judiciary appointments must be free from any political considerations.
A
Amit K.
As a law student, I'm happy to see diverse names in the appointments - shows our judiciary represents India's pluralism. Hope these judges will uphold constitutional values and protect citizens' rights.
S
Sunita R.
The MoP process seems quite bureaucratic with multiple layers. While checks are important, we need faster appointments to fill vacancies. Justice delayed is justice denied, as they say.
V
Vikram J.
Gujarat HC getting experienced judicial officers is good news. Hope they'll focus on clearing commercial disputes faster - this will boost investor confidence in the state's business environment.
N
Neha T.
While welcoming the appointments, I hope the judiciary will pay special attention to women's cases and fast-track them. Many gender-related cases get stuck in our overburdened system for years. 🤞

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50