NewKerala.com

Delhi Election Mystery: Why Destroyed CCTV Footage Raises Legal Questions

The Election Commission has confirmed that CCTV recordings from Delhi's 2024 Lok Sabha elections were destroyed following updated guidelines. Advocate Mehmood Pracha challenged this decision, arguing the footage should have been preserved during his pending petition. The ECI maintained the destruction was lawful under their May 2025 circular aimed at preventing social media misuse. The court has scheduled the next hearing for February 2026 while the petitioner reserves rights for further legal action.

Key Points: ECI Says Delhi Lok Sabha CCTV Footage Destroyed Per Rules

  • ECI destroyed CCTV footage per May 2025 guidelines allowing 45-day retention
  • Petitioner argued footage should be preserved during pending court case
  • Guidelines aimed to prevent misuse of polling visuals on social media
  • Court declined interim relief, next hearing scheduled for February 2026
2 min read

CCTV recordings from 2024 Lok Sabha elections in Delhi destroyed as per rules: ECI to Delhi HC

Election Commission reveals 2024 Delhi election CCTV recordings destroyed after 45 days as per updated guidelines, sparking legal challenge from petitioner.

"The footage sought by the petitioner is no longer available with the DEOs and has already been destroyed - ECI's counsel"

New Delhi, November 12

The Election Commission of India (ECI) informed the Delhi High Court that CCTV and video recordings from polling stations during the 2024 Lok Sabha elections in Delhi have been destroyed and are no longer held by District Election Officers (DEOs), in accordance with updated guidelines.

This disclosure was made during a hearing before Justice Mini Pushkarna on a petition filed by Advocate Mehmood Pracha, who had requested the preservation of all video and CCTV material related to the elections.

Representing the ECI, Senior Advocate Sandeep Sethi stated that the footage was discarded in accordance with revised guidelines issued on May 30, 2025. These guidelines mandate that such data, including CCTV visuals, webcasting content, and polling day photographs, be retained for only 45 days unless an election petition is filed contesting the results. Advocate Sidhant Kumar also represented the Election Commission in the matter.

"The footage sought by the petitioner is no longer available with the DEOs and has already been destroyed," the ECI's counsel told the court, adding that the updated instructions were aimed at curbing the misuse of polling visuals on social media by individuals not involved in the electoral process.

Pracha, appearing in person with his legal team, contested the ECI's position. He argued that the footage should have been preserved since his petition was already pending before the court. He cited Paragraph 19.10.4 of the ECI's 2023 Handbook for Returning Officers, which requires retention of video recordings when any election-related complaint or legal proceeding is underway.

He also referred to a Supreme Court order dated August 20, 2024, which had granted him permission to approach the Delhi High Court with specific grievances concerning the elections.

The ECI maintained that its actions were lawful and aligned with the May 2025 circular, which superseded previous instructions.

Justice Pushkarna, acknowledging the arguments from both sides, declined to issue any interim relief, noting that the petitioner had not challenged the validity of the May 2025 circular. The court recorded the submissions and scheduled the next hearing for February 13, 2026.

Pracha has reserved the right to pursue further legal remedies regarding the alleged destruction of the election footage.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Actually, the ECI followed their updated guidelines properly. 45 days is sufficient time for any genuine complaints. We need to trust our institutions rather than creating unnecessary controversies.
S
Sarah B
As someone working in data management, I understand the storage challenges. But election integrity should override storage concerns. Maybe they could have kept it in compressed format? 🤔
A
Arjun K
The timing is suspicious. Why change guidelines after elections? This doesn't inspire confidence. We need better systems to ensure election transparency. Jai Hind!
M
Michael C
Respectfully, I think the ECI has a point about preventing misuse on social media. We've seen how election footage can be edited and shared out of context to create unrest.
K
Kavya N
The court should have intervened when the petition was pending. Now we'll never know if there were genuine issues. This sets a bad precedent for future elections. 😟

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50