Key Points

The Central Consumer Protection Authority has penalized e-commerce platform FirstCry for misleading pricing strategies. The company was found to display products with seemingly inclusive prices, but added GST at checkout, reducing actual discounts. By implementing "drip pricing," FirstCry undermined consumer trust and decision-making processes. Following the investigation, the company has been directed to rectify its pricing display and ensure complete transparency.

Key Points: CCPA Fines FirstCry Rs 2 Lakh for Misleading Price Ads

  • CCPA exposes misleading discount practices on FirstCry platform
  • Company charged additional GST after advertising tax-inclusive prices
  • Actual discounts significantly lower than advertised
  • Consumers misled about final product pricing
2 min read

CCPA slaps Rs 2 lakh fine on FirstCry for misleading ad, unfair trade practices

Consumer protection authority penalizes e-commerce platform FirstCry for deceptive pricing and unfair trade practices on its website

"Such practice contravened Rule 7(1)(e) of the Consumer Protection (E-Commerce) Rules, 2020 - CCPA Statement"

New Delhi, Sep 26

The Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) on Friday said it has imposed a penalty of Rs 2,00,000 on Digital Age Retail Pvt Ltd (FirstCry) for false and misleading price representations.

Passed under Sections 10, 20 and 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, the order was issued for publishing misleading advertisements and engaging in unfair trade practices on its e-commerce platform (www.firstcry.com).

The matter arose from a consumer complaint that FirstCry displayed products with the representation "MRP inclusive of all taxes," while at the checkout stage, an additional GST was levied on the discounted price.

This created a misleading impression of higher discounts and misled consumers about the final payable amount, according to a statement from the Ministry of Consumer Affairs.

The investigation supported by data from the National Consumer Helpline (NCH), showed that the practice of advertising discounts on the MRP but separately charging GST on the discounted price significantly reduced the benefit to consumers.

For example, products advertised with a 27 per cent discount were effectively sold at only an 18.2 per cent discount after GST was applied.

Such representations were found to amount to deceptive pricing, misleading advertisements under Section 2(28), and unfair trade practices under Section 2(47) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

It was observed that disclaimers such as "additional charges may apply" or "GST and Additional charges may apply on discounted price" did not override the statutory requirement that the MRP must be inclusive of all taxes.

By representing the price as tax-inclusive and then levying GST at checkout, the company engaged in "drip pricing," a dark pattern under the Guidelines for Prevention and Regulation of Dark Patterns, 2023, which misled consumers about the final payable amount and undermined informed decision-making.

"Such practice also contravened Rule 7(1)(e) of the Consumer Protection (E-Commerce) Rules, 2020, which requires the total price, inclusive of all charges and taxes, to be displayed upfront," according to the CCPA.

The CCPA, therefore, directed the company to rectify this practice and ensure that both original and discounted prices are shown as inclusive of all taxes, with any additional charges clearly disclosed.

Following CCPA's intervention, the company has rectified its platform to provide more transparency in the display of prices across the company's website and mobile application.

Also, a prominent display of the disclaimer 'price inclusive of all taxes' is put across all pages of the Website and mobile application of the Company.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
Good move by CCPA! This "drip pricing" is so common across all e-commerce platforms. Hope other companies take notice and become more transparent. As a parent who shops regularly for baby products, I appreciate this consumer protection. 👏
S
Sarah B
While I support consumer protection, I think ₹2 lakh is actually a reasonable starting penalty. The important thing is they've fixed the practice. Sometimes heavy fines just lead to legal battles instead of actual change. This seems balanced.
A
Arjun K
This is why I prefer shopping from local stores for baby products. At least the price you see is the price you pay. Online shopping has too many hidden charges. Good that government is taking action against these dark patterns.
K
Kavya N
I'm glad they mentioned the 27% vs 18.2% discount example. That's exactly how customers get fooled! We need more such strict actions. Hope this sets an example for Flipkart, Amazon and others who do similar things. 🇮🇳
M
Michael C
Interesting to see India's consumer protection framework evolving. The "dark patterns" guidelines seem quite comprehensive. This kind of regulatory clarity is good for both businesses and consumers in the long run.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50