Key Points

The Calcutta High Court delivered a blow to the Mamata government by staying its OBC list notification. Judges highlighted procedural lapses, noting the state skipped mandatory surveys under the 2012 Act. Petitioners argued the list recycled old data with minimal changes, while the Centre flagged religious conversion complexities. The ruling stalls admissions and recruitment but preserves pre-2010 OBC certificates.

Key Points: Calcutta HC Stays WB Govt OBC List Citing Survey Lapses

  • Interim stay on 140-community OBC list citing flawed survey
  • Bench warns against bypassing legislative procedures
  • 66 communities flagged for review
  • 1993-era certificates remain valid for jobs
2 min read

Calcutta HC grants interim stay on WB Govt's OBC list notification till July 31

Court halts Mamata's OBC notification till July 31, questions flawed survey and procedural gaps in 140-community list.

"You have done half the work... Why didn’t you amend the 2012 Act? - Justice Rajasekhar Mantha"

Kolkata, June 18

The Calcutta High Court on Monday gave an interim stay on the West Bengal government's recently issued notifications on the OBC list till July 31.

This order is a big setback for the Mamata government.

A division bench comprising Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty and Justice Raja Sekhar Mantha passed the interim order while hearing petitions challenging the state's classification of communities under the Other Backward Classes (OBC) category.

Judges said that necessary steps should be taken regarding the 66 communities belonging to the OBC category.

In this latest OBC notification there are listed 140 communities. However, OBC certificates issued before 2010 under the 1993 law remain valid for employment and admissions.

The bench warned that the executive cannot bypass legislative procedures, stating that half the process was followed and the rest done unilaterally.

Petitioners claimed the survey was flawed, with limited samples and negligible changes from the earlier list. The state admitted that college admissions and recruitment are stalled due to the case.

During the hearing, Solicitor General Ashok Chakraborty, representing the Centre, pointed out that the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC) had sought clarification from the state on how Muslim and OBC classifications were identified.

The NCBC minutes mentioned that several communities had converted from Hinduism to Islam, complicating census data.

Justice Rajasekhar Mantha raised the question to state, saying, "You have done half the work according to the 2012 OBC Act. Then you have gone back to the 1993 Act. Why is this? Why didn't you amend the 2012 Act? You have been providing benefits for the last 15 years. The law says that a survey has to be done after 10 years. That survey has not been done."

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

Here are 6 diverse Indian perspective comments for the given article:
A
Arjun K.
The court's intervention was necessary. Reservations should be based on proper surveys and data, not political considerations. Hope this leads to more transparency in the process. 🙏
P
Priya M.
As someone from Bengal, I'm concerned about how this will affect students' admissions. The government should have followed proper procedures instead of rushing this through. Education shouldn't suffer because of administrative lapses.
R
Rahul S.
The court's question about why the 2012 Act wasn't amended is valid. Governments can't keep switching between old and new laws as per convenience. This creates confusion for citizens and officials alike.
S
Sneha B.
While reservations are important for social justice, the process must be fair and transparent. The conversion aspect mentioned is particularly sensitive - we need clear guidelines on how to handle such cases.
D
Deepak R.
The court's warning about executive overreach is important for all states to note. In democracy, procedures matter as much as outcomes. Hope other governments learn from this.
M
Meena T.
This is a complex issue with no easy answers. While we must protect legitimate OBC rights, we also need to prevent misuse of the system. The 10-year survey rule exists for good reason - why wasn't it followed? 🤔

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50