NewKerala.com

Key Points

A 22-year-old law student and social media influencer, Sharmistha Panoli, has been granted interim bail by the Calcutta High Court after her arrest for a controversial Instagram video. The court criticized the arrest as mechanical and unnecessary, imposing conditions that require her full cooperation with the investigation. Panoli, who had deleted the video and apologized publicly, was arrested from Gurugram on May 30 after an FIR was registered against her. The court's decision highlights the complex intersection of free speech, social media, and religious sensitivities in contemporary India.

Key Points: Sharmistha Panoli Wins Interim Bail in Religious Sentiments Case

  • Calcutta HC grants interim bail with strict investigative conditions
  • Student arrested for controversial Instagram video
  • Personal bond of Rs 10,000 required
  • Police directed to ensure her protection
2 min read

Calcutta HC grants interim bail to law student held for hurting religious sentiments

Law student Sharmistha Panoli granted interim bail by Calcutta HC after controversial Instagram post sparks legal battle

"Arrest warrant was mechanical and without proper evaluation - Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury"

Kolkata, June 5

The Calcutta High Court on Thursday granted interim bail for Sharmistha Panoli, the 22-year-old law student and social media influencer arrested recently by Kolkata Police on charges of hurting religious sentiments and promoting hatred through her posts.

A vacation bench of Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury granted her interim bail against a personal bond of Rs 10,000.

However, at the same time, her interim bail comes with a lot of restrictions as well. The court directed her to fully cooperate in the investigation carried out against her by the Kolkata Police and not leave the country without the prior permission of the court.

Justice Basu Chowdhury also observed that in case she is required to go abroad for academic purposes, her application should be treated seriously by the trial court.

The single-judge bench also directed the Kolkata Police to ensure full protection for her considering the threats received by her over her controversial post which she deleted later in the face of criticisms and also tendered a public apology for posting it.

The High Court also ruled out the necessity for custodial interrogation of Panoli by the investigating officers.

It also observed that the arrest warrant issued against Panoli was mechanical in nature and it was done without proper evaluation of whether there was a really cognisable offence in the matter. The court also noted that the process of serving notice was going on when she was out of Kolkata.

An FIR was registered against Panoli at Garden Reach Police Station on May 15 for posting an Instagram video, where she made some objectionable comments related to 'Operation Sindoor' that had reportedly hurt the religious sentiments of a particular community.

In the face of strong criticism, the law student deleted that video. She also tendered a public apology for the matter. However, she was arrested on May 30 from Gurugram.

On May 31, the trial court in Kolkata sent her to judicial custody till June 13.

The BJP's Bengal unit questioned the "overnight" action of Kolkata Police against her and called the move by the city police a vote-bank vendetta.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

Here are 6 diverse Indian perspective comments for the given article:
A
Arjun M.
Finally some sense prevailed! The HC rightly pointed out the mechanical nature of arrest. Freedom of expression is fundamental, even if opinions are controversial. She apologized, deleted the post - that should have been enough. Police overreach is becoming too common these days.
P
Priya R.
While I don't support hurting religious sentiments, the court's balanced approach is commendable. The restrictions imposed ensure accountability while protecting her rights. Young people should think twice before posting inflammatory content though - social media isn't a joke! 🤔
R
Rahul K.
This case shows how easily our laws can be misused. If every offensive post leads to arrest, half of Twitter would be behind bars! The court's observation about mechanical arrests is spot on. Hope this sets a precedent for similar cases.
S
Sunita P.
As a law student herself, she should have known better. Religious sentiments are sensitive in our country. But the punishment should fit the crime - bail with conditions seems fair. Hope she learns her lesson and uses her platform more responsibly. 🙏
V
Vikram S.
The political angle can't be ignored here. Why was there such urgency to arrest her when she had already apologized? The court's intervention was much needed to check this growing trend of using police for settling political scores. Democracy needs breathing space!
N
Neha T.
Mixed feelings about this. While free speech is important, we must respect each other's beliefs. Maybe instead of arrests, we need more dialogue and education about religious harmony. The court's middle path seems practical - bail with conditions. Hope peace prevails! ✌️

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50