Sonia Gandhi's Sharp Attack: How Modi's "Bulldozer" Targets Rural Livelihoods

Sonia Gandhi has launched a fierce critique of the Modi government's handling of MGNREGA. She argues the recent VB-G RAM G Bill represents a "bulldozer" approach that undermines the rural poor. Gandhi recalls the scheme's success in providing a legal right to work and stopping distress migration. She pledges that the Congress party will fight against these changes to protect rural livelihoods.

Key Points: Sonia Gandhi Slams Modi Govt Over MGNREGA Changes in VB-G RAM G Bill

  • Sonia Gandhi accuses govt of systematically undermining MGNREGA over 11 years
  • She claims recent unilateral changes removed Gandhi's name from the scheme
  • Gandhi asserts MGNREGA was a revolutionary step that halted distress migration
  • The Congress vows to resist what it calls an assault on rural livelihoods
3 min read

'Bulldozer on MGNREGA': Sonia Gandhi attacks Modi govt over G RAM G Bill

Sonia Gandhi accuses Modi govt of bulldozing MGNREGA, undermining rural poor. She vows Congress resistance to the new "black law" altering the jobs scheme.

"By weakening this law, the government has attacked the rights of crores of farmers, labourers and landless rural poor. - Sonia Gandhi"

New Delhi, Dec 20

Congress Parliamentary Party (CPP) chairperson Sonia Gandhi on Saturday mounted a sharp attack on the PM Narendra Modi-led government, accusing it of systematically running a "bulldozer" over the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) and undermining the rights of rural poor, farmers and landless workers, terming it an “assault on rural livelihoods”.

This comes two days after the Parliament passed the VB-G RAM G Bill 2025, which escalated into a major political slugfest between the government and the opposition.

In a video message shared by the Congress on X, Gandhi recalled the passage of the landmark employment guarantee law nearly two decades ago during the tenure of former Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh.

She said MGNREGA was passed with broad consensus in Parliament and proved to be a “revolutionary step” that provided livelihood security to crores of rural families, particularly the most deprived and marginalised.

“The law stopped distress migration by ensuring employment in one’s own village, strengthened gram panchayats and gave a legal right to work,” Gandhi said, adding that the scheme embodied Mahatma Gandhi’s vision of Gram Swaraj.

She noted that MGNREGA acted as a lifeline for the poor during the COVID-19 pandemic.

However, the Congress leader alleged that over the past 11 years, the Modi government had made repeated attempts to dilute the scheme by ignoring the interests of the rural unemployed and poor.

She expressed “deep anguish” over what she described as recent unilateral changes to the programme.

“Without consultation, discussion or taking the opposition into confidence, the government has altered the very structure of MGNREGA. Even Mahatma Gandhi’s name has been removed,” Sonia Gandhi claimed.

She warned that decisions on who gets work, how much employment is provided and where it is offered are now being taken “from Delhi, far removed from ground realities”.

Emphasising that MGNREGA was never a party-specific initiative, Gandhi said the Congress may have played a key role in bringing the law, but it was always meant to serve national and public interest.

“By weakening this law, the government has attacked the rights of crores of farmers, labourers and landless rural poor,” she said.

Gandhi asserted that the Congress was fully prepared to resist what she termed an assault on rural livelihoods. “I fought for the employment guarantee law 20 years ago, and I remain committed to fighting this ‘black law’ today,” she said, adding that Congress leaders and workers stood firmly with the people.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As an observer, it's concerning when landmark social welfare schemes are altered without bipartisan discussion. The pandemic proved MGNREGA's critical role as a safety net. Transparency and consultation are key for any reform.
A
Arjun K
Why remove Mahatma Gandhi's name? That itself shows the intention. This scheme helped stop forced migration to cities. If Delhi starts deciding everything, how will they know our local problems? Gram Swaraj is being weakened. 😔
V
Vikram M
While I support reforms for efficiency, doing it unilaterally is not the Indian way. The opposition has a point about lack of discussion. A scheme that helped crores deserves respect, not a bulldozer. Hope the government reconsiders and holds proper talks.
P
Priya S
My didi works under MGNREGA. It gives her dignity and some money for our family. Politicians fight in Delhi, but who is thinking about the women in the fields? This is about real people, not just votes.
K
Karthik V
Let's be fair. The scheme had issues with corruption and delays in payments. Maybe changes are needed for better implementation? But Sonia Gandhi is right about one thing - it should not become a political football. It's for the poor.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50