Bombay High Court orders BCCI to pay ₹538 crore to Kochi Tuskers owners

ANI June 19, 2025 287 views

The Bombay High Court has ruled that the BCCI must pay ₹538 crore to Kochi Tuskers' owners for wrongful termination. The franchise played just one IPL season in 2011 before being axed over a bank guarantee dispute. The team featured big names like Jayawardene, McCullum, and Jadeja during their short stint. The court dismissed BCCI's objections, stating the arbitration award was based on proper evidence.

"BCCI's dissatisfaction as to the findings rendered in respect of the evidence cannot be a ground to assail the Award." - Justice Riyaz I. Chagla
Mumbai, June 19: The Bombay High Court on Wednesday upheld the arbitral awards issued in 2015, directing the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) to pay a total of Rs 538.84 crore in compensation following the termination of the Kochi Tuskers Kerala franchise from the Indian Premier League (IPL), as per ESPNcricinfo.

Key Points

1

Bombay HC upholds ₹538 crore arbitration award against BCCI

2

Kochi Tuskers played only one IPL season in 2011

3

BCCI terminated franchise over bank guarantee dispute

4

Team featured stars like Mahela Jayawardene and Muttiah Muralitharan

As per the court's ruling, the BCCI must pay Rs 385.50 crore to Kochi Cricket Private Limited (KCPL) and Rs 153.34 crore to Rendezvous Sports World (RSW), the two stakeholders of the now-defunct franchise.

Kochi Tuskers Kerala competed in just one IPL season, in 2011, finishing eighth out of ten teams. The franchise was terminated by the BCCI in September that year for allegedly breaching contractual terms by failing to furnish a bank guarantee within the specified timeframe. This led to a lengthy legal battle, culminating in arbitration, which ultimately went in favour of KCPL and RSW.

The team, captained by Sri Lanka's Mahela Jayawardene, registered six wins and eight losses during their sole campaign. The squad featured high-profile players including New Zealand's Brendon McCullum, legendary Lankan spinner Muttiah Muralitharan, and Indian all-rounder Ravindra Jadeja.

"The jurisdiction of this Court under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act is very limited," Justice Riyaz I. Chagla said in his order, as quoted from ESPNcricinfo.

"BCCI's endeavour to delve into the merits of the dispute is in teeth of the scope of the grounds contained in Section 34 of the Act. BCCI's dissatisfaction as to the findings rendered in respect of the evidence and/or the merits cannot be a ground to assail the Award," he added.

"The conclusion of the learned Arbitrator namely that BCCI had wrongfully invoked the bank guarantee which amounted to a repudiatory breach of the KCPL-FA would call for no interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act considering that this is based on a correct appreciation of the evidence on record," he noted.

Six weeks of time have been granted to the BCCI to file an appeal.

Reader Comments

Here are 6 diverse Indian perspective comments for the article:
R
Rahul K.
Finally justice prevails! BCCI has been acting like an autocratic body for too long. They can't just terminate teams on whims and fancies. Hope this sets a precedent for better governance in Indian cricket. 🤞
P
Priya M.
₹538 crore is a huge amount! Instead of wasting money on legal battles, BCCI should focus on improving cricket infrastructure in smaller cities. Remember how excited Kerala was to have an IPL team? Such a shame it ended this way.
A
Amit S.
As a cricket fan from Kochi, this news brings mixed feelings. We lost our only IPL team due to politics, and now after 12 years, only money remains. Would have preferred to see cricket thrive in Kerala rather than this courtroom drama.
S
Sanjay V.
The court's observation about BCCI trying to "delve into merits" shows their arrogance. They think they're above the law. Time for complete transparency in cricket administration - where does all this IPL money actually go?
N
Neha T.
Interesting to see how BCCI handles this. They've become so powerful that they forget they're accountable too. Maybe this judgment will make them more careful with contracts and franchise dealings in future.
V
Vikram J.
While the judgment seems fair, I worry about where this money will come from. Will it affect player salaries or domestic cricket funding? BCCI should clarify this instead of keeping fans in the dark as usual.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Your email won't be published


Disclaimer: Comments here reflect the author's views alone. Insulting or using offensive language against individuals, communities, religion, or the nation is illegal.

Tags: