Bangladesh's Political Shift: Why Western Powers Now Embrace Tarique Rahman

Western powers are dramatically shifting their stance on Bangladesh's political landscape. Tarique Rahman, once condemned as a symbol of corruption, is now being viewed as a potential prime minister. This reversal exposes what experts call "instrumental internationalism" in foreign policy. The changing narrative reveals how geopolitical interests often override principles of accountability and democracy.

Key Points: BNP's Tarique Rahman Gains Ground Amid Western Strategy Shift

  • Western powers now view Tarique Rahman as viable partner despite past corruption allegations
  • International community shifts stance after Awami League government's fall in 2024
  • Report highlights "instrumental internationalism" in Western foreign policy approach
  • Rahman's political rehabilitation raises questions about accountability and impunity cycles
3 min read

BNP's Rahman gains ground in Bangladesh amid Western strategic shift: Report

Western powers recalibrate Bangladesh policy as Tarique Rahman transitions from "Dark Prince" to potential PM candidate amid geopolitical realignment.

"The case of Tarique Rahman is the latest example of the West's dual standards - South Asia Centre Report"

Dhaka, Nov 12

Since the political realignment in Bangladesh following the fall of the Awami League government led by Sheikh Hasina in August 2024, Western powers have recalibrated their interests in the country with Tarique Rahman, the Acting Chairman of Khaleda Zia-led Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), formerly seen as a "symbol of kleptocratic government and violent politics", now emerging as a "viable political partner and a possible future Prime Minister", a report said on Wednesday.

"The current political trajectory in Bangladesh has brought the spotlight back to the longstanding conundrum surrounding the international community's role in fragile democracies. For the last two decades, Western nations and multilateral bodies have assumed the uninvited role of guardians of democratic accountability, the rule of law and anti-corruption efforts in Bangladesh. However, the same international institutions now appear to be accomplices -- either by passive approval or changed diplomatic policies -- in the reinstatement of political leaders they once condemned. The case of Tarique Rahman, the exiled Chairman of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) is a case in point," a report in the South Asia Centre of London School of Economics and Political Science detailed.

It stated that the changing narrative surrounding Rahman highlights a deeper contradiction in international action toward Bangladesh: a discrepancy between normative principles and political realism.

"In the past, the West justified their actions toward Bangladesh's politics -- whether, for instance, through aid conditionality, governance programs or diplomatic pressure -- as a means of combating corruption and promoting democracy. Yet, these same actors now appear willing to reinterpret past narratives of corruption and extremism when doing so aligns with changing geopolitical or regional priorities," the report stressed.

"This pattern is not new, nor is it unique toward Bangladesh. It reflects a broader logic of what might be called 'instrumental internationalism' -- a paradigm that allows global powers to exploit moral rhetoric as a flexible tool for exerting control rather than advocating a principled stance. It also allows the West to shuffle between regimes to ensure its geopolitical interests are served, particularly in the face of changing international political landscapes," it noted.

According to the report, over several decades, fraying democracies have applied uneven standards while condemning human rights violations and disregard for the rule of law; some regimes are criticised, while others are ignored or defended when aligned with Western interests.

"The case of Tarique Rahman is the latest example of the West's dual standards. By accepting Rahman's involvement in politics without accountability despite his earlier image as the 'Dark Prince of Hawa Bhaban' (in their own words), the cycle of impunity is allowed to continue," it noted.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
As an Indian, I'm concerned about how this political instability in Bangladesh might affect regional security. We need stable neighbors for peace and development in South Asia.
A
Arjun K
The West's hypocrisy is nothing new. They lecture us about democracy but change their stance overnight when their geopolitical interests shift. Bangladesh deserves better than being a pawn in global politics.
S
Sarah B
While I understand the strategic concerns, I respectfully disagree with the article's tone. Western nations do have genuine interest in promoting democracy, but they also have to balance real-world geopolitical realities. It's not always black and white.
V
Vikram M
Bangladesh's political situation affects India directly. Hope the new leadership maintains good relations with India and focuses on development rather than playing into external powers' hands. 🇮🇳
K
Kavya N
The common people of Bangladesh suffer the most in these political games. First they were told Rahman was corrupt, now he's acceptable? Western powers should be more consistent in their principles.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50