Key Points

The Election Commission has informed the Supreme Court that current laws don't require sharing lists of voters missing from draft rolls. This comes after an NGO alleged over 65 lakh names were deleted from Bihar's electoral rolls without proper justification. The ECI maintains that political parties received exclusion lists and no eligible voter will be removed without notice. The Supreme Court will hear petitions challenging Bihar's electoral roll revision this week.

Key Points: ECI Tells SC No Law Requires Sharing Missing Voter Lists in Bihar

  • ECI says no legal obligation to disclose missing voter lists
  • ADR alleged 65 lakh deletions lacked transparency
  • Political parties received updated exclusion lists
  • SC to hear petitions on Bihar electoral roll revision
2 min read

Bihar polls: Law doesn't require sharing list of people missing from electoral rolls, ECI tells SC

ECI clarifies to SC that electoral law doesn't mandate sharing lists of missing voters or reasons for exclusion in Bihar polls.

"No eligible voter in Bihar will be removed from electoral rolls without prior notice - ECI affidavit"

New Delhi, August 11

The Election Commission of India (ECI) has told the Supreme Court that the law does not require it to prepare or share any separate list of names of people missing from draft electoral rolls or publish the reasons for their non-inclusion "for any reason" whatsoever.

Responding on the allegations by NGO Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) that over 65 lakh names had been deleted from Bihar's draft electoral rolls without transparency and without disclosure of whether the deletions related to deceased persons, migrants, or other categories, ECI said no eligible voter in Bihar will be removed from the electoral rolls without prior notice during the ongoing special intensive revision (SIR) in the state.

The ECI further said that no such lists need to be prepared or shared of "previous" electors whose enumeration forms were not received.

Reiterating the need for an opportunity to be heard and a reasoned order, the poll panel stressed that "strict directions" have been issued to prevent wrongful deletions during the ongoing special intensive revision (SIR) in the state.

The top court has already fixed the hearing on August 12 and 13 of a batch of pleas challenging the Election Commission of India's move to conduct SIR of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar.

The affidavit further stated, "After the publication of the draft rolls, the political parties were supplied with an updated list of names of electors not included in the draft roll so as to ensure all attempts are made to reach out to these individuals and no eligible elector is left out. The political parties have acknowledged receipt of the said list. Here, it is also pertinent to point out that the list includes acknowledgements on behalf of CPI(M-L) as well."

Booth Level Officers (BLOs) had held polling station meetings with Booth Level Agents (BLAs) of political parties on August 7, almost a week after the publication of the preliminary electoral roll on August 1, it said.

The poll panel submitted, "The list of electors whose names could not be included in the draft electoral roll were read out and shared and appeals were made to the BLAs and others to reach out to them so that no eligible voter can be left out."

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
As a Bihar voter, I appreciate ECI's assurance that no eligible voter will be removed without notice. But sharing reasons for deletions would build more trust in the system.
A
Arjun K
The fact that political parties got the list is good enough. Too much transparency can lead to misuse by anti-national elements. ECI knows best how to conduct elections.
S
Sarah B
Interesting legal point here. If the law doesn't require sharing this information, why is SC hearing petitions against it? Seems like activists trying to create unnecessary controversy.
K
Kavya N
My uncle's name was missing last election! Had to run pillar to post to get it included. ECI should make the process simpler for common people, not just political parties.
V
Vikram M
Clean electoral rolls are important to prevent bogus voting. If names of deceased/migrants are removed, it's actually good for election integrity. But process must be fair.
M
Michael C
Respectfully disagree with ECI's stance. In digital India, voter data should be easily accessible to citizens through online portals with proper authentication.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50