B'desh: Employees threaten to intensify protests over interim govt's service ordinance law

IANS June 19, 2025 237 views

Bangladesh Secretariat employees have resumed protests against the controversial service ordinance enacted under interim leader Muhammad Yunus. Leaders vow to escalate demonstrations unless the "black law" is repealed, citing risks of harassment. The law advisor conceded potential flaws but distanced himself from its drafting. The ordinance imposes harsh penalties like dismissal for absenteeism, fueling public sector unrest.

"Our movement will continue until this ordinance is completely repealed" - Babul Kabir
Dhaka, June 19: Several officials and employees at the Secretariat in Bangladesh resumed protests on Thursday, demanding the repeal of the controversial "black law" -- the Government Service (Amendment) Ordinance, which was enacted by the interim government led by Muhammad Yunus, according to local media reports.

Key Points

1

Employees demand repeal of Yunus-era service ordinance

2

Protesters threaten intensified rallies if demands unmet

3

Law advisor admits ordinance may cause harassment

4

Ordinance penalizes absenteeism with demotion or dismissal

The demonstrations were also witnessed last month when hundreds of employees from various ministries and divisions of the country gathered at the Secretariat in Dhaka, demanding the cancellation of the ordinance.

Meanwhile, on Thursday, the protest led by the Bangladesh Secretariat Officers and Employees Unity Forum threatened to intensify their actions if the demands were not addressed.

Co-chairmen Badiul Kabir and Nurul Islam, and several leaders of the forum, participated in the demonstration.

"We demand the repeal of this black law. We also demand a 50 per cent dearness allowance and the removal of officials who are aligned with fascist practices," Bangladeshi daily Dhaka Tribune reported, quoting Nurul Islam as saying.

"Our movement will continue until this ordinance is completely repealed," Babul Kabir stated.

Earlier this week, the forum called for a mass rally at the Secretariat's Badamtala if the government refused to revoke the ordinance.

Forum's secretary-general, Mujahidul Islam Selim, questioning interim government's law advisor Asif Nazrul, said, "The advisor claimed he was abroad when the law was passed, implying that had he been present, the ordinance would never have been approved."

"We are not thugs. We are not the kind to take to the streets and shout slogans. Why are you provoking us?" he asked.

Addressing the media at the Secretariat on Monday, Nazrul stated that through this ordinance, government employees may become "victims of harassment," adding that "scope for reconsideration" of some parts exists.

"There is definitely room for reconsideration of the Public Service Ordinance. I was abroad at the time. I was not directly involved in the formulation of the law. Later, when I saw the law, I felt that there was scope for reconsideration in some parts. The government did not make the law for any malicious purpose. Still, those for whom the law is intended may face difficulties or be harassed under this law," the law advisor said

"I admit that there is such a possibility. This is a law made by the Ministry of Public Administration. Any ordinance is issued through the law ministry. But the ministry did not write this," he further added.

Following the approval of the draft law by the Council of Advisors on May 22, during an advisory council meeting of the interim administration, the government employees began staging protests at the Secretariat, calling the law unjust and unconstitutional.

Reports suggest that according to the provisions of the amended ordinance, if government officials are disobedient, absent from work without leave, or obstruct others from performing their duties, it will be considered a punishable offence, which includes demotion, removal, or dismissal.

Reader Comments

R
Rahul K.
This shows how important it is to protect workers' rights everywhere. India should watch this situation closely since we have strong trade unions too. Hope Bangladesh finds a peaceful solution soon. šŸ™
P
Priya M.
The ordinance seems too harsh - demotion or dismissal for being absent without leave? What about medical emergencies? Our neighbor should reconsider this law carefully. India faced similar labor issues during British rule, we know how this goes.
A
Amit S.
While I support workers' rights, protests shouldn't disrupt governance. Bangladesh needs stability, especially with economic challenges. Maybe they can learn from India's labor reforms - balance between discipline and rights is key.
N
Neha P.
Interesting how the law advisor claims he wasn't involved! Typical politician talk šŸ˜’ Hope our Bangladeshi brothers and sisters get justice. Their demands for dearness allowance seem reasonable considering inflation affects all of South Asia.
S
Sanjay D.
As an Indian who has worked in Dhaka, I can say Bangladeshi workers are very disciplined. If they're protesting this strongly, the law must really be problematic. Their government should listen before things escalate.
M
Meena R.
The 'fascist practices' comment is concerning. India and Bangladesh both suffered under authoritarian regimes in the past. Hope they resolve this democratically. SAARC nations should support fair labor policies across borders.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Your email won't be published


Disclaimer: Comments here reflect the author's views alone. Insulting or using offensive language against individuals, communities, religion, or the nation is illegal.

Tags: