Outsider Politics: How Tejashwi and Mamata's 'Bahari vs Bohiragata' Battle Heats Up

Regional leaders are increasingly using the 'outsider' narrative as a political strategy against national parties. Tejashwi Yadav's 'Bihari vs Bahari' slogan counters BJP campaigns in Bihar while protecting his party's legacy. Similarly, Mamata Banerjee frames central BJP leaders as outsiders threatening West Bengal's autonomy. This rhetoric aims to shift focus from performance records to existential stakes during heated election periods.

Key Points: Tejashwi Yadav Mamata Banerjee Outsider Politics Strategy

  • Tejashwi positions himself as proud local confronting external political forces in Bihar
  • Mamata Banerjee classifies BJP leaders as outsiders despite TMC having non-Bengali MPs
  • Both leaders use rhetoric to counter BJP narrative and protect regional dominance
  • Legal provisions allow MPs to represent constituencies outside their home states
4 min read

'Bahari & Bohiragata': The changing political narrative

RJD's Tejashwi Yadav and TMC's Mamata Banerjee deploy 'outsider' rhetoric against BJP in Bihar and West Bengal, reshaping political narratives ahead of state elections.

"For both leaders, any entity not endorsed by them and having the potential to upset their applecart in the respective playing fields is an outsider."

New Delhi, Oct 29

Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Tejashwai Yadav frequently raises the “Bahari” issue, which has a similarity with the “Bohiragata” rhetoric of his national ally Trinamool Congress (TMC) supremo Mamata Banerjee, where both the words translated into English mean “outsider”.

Though emanating from different states, political cultures, and histories, both usages share tactical similarities, divergent intentions, and comparable risks for democratic debate and social cohesion.

For both leaders, any entity not endorsed by them and having the potential to upset their applecart in the respective playing fields is an outsider.

Tejashwi's reiterating the "Bihari versus bahari" slogan has been linked to his efforts to counter the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) narrative in Bihar. Particularly, when national leaders campaign in the state and their critics attempt to resurrect memories of past misgovernance with "jungle raaj" associated with his party's legacy.

He has publicly positioned himself as a proud local confronting what he casts as an external political force trying to dominate Bihar's affairs.

For Mamata, there was a time when even Congress leader Rahul Gandhi was in the "outsider" category, when she had termed him as a seasonal bird flying into her state only to seek votes. The same classification she continues to spell for BJP leaders as well.

Meanwhile, her critics accuse her of covering the fact that the Trinamool itself has three Members of Parliament who can be equally considered as being from outside West Bengal.

However, according to the Representation of the People Act, 1951, any elector for a Parliamentary constituency in India is qualified to be chosen to represent any state or Union territory, or a specific seat, with certain exceptions for places like Assam, Lakshadweep, and Sikkim.

For state legislatures, the rules specify persons eligible for election as those who are electors in the state, with some added specifications for certain parts of the country. Thus, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi represent constituencies other than their respective "home states".

The rhetoric is therefore aimed specifically at building a political narrative and guiding public perception. Mamata's "outsider" classification against central BJP leaders is also criticised by the BJP's state unit as her reaction to policies such as the Citizenship (Amendment) Act and the National Register of Citizens.

The BJP, which has emerged as West Bengal's principal Opposition party, allege that moves initiated against real outsiders are being targeted by the Chief Minister since these may affect her vote banks.

But the Trinamool leadership frames such moves as threats to the state's cultural and political autonomy. This has also been the position of other political parties in the state opposed to the BJP.

Meanwhile, Tejashwi's rhetoric may have evolved from his resistance to the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in Bihar. Though yet to raise specific issues after the completion of the process, he has continued to reiterate the "Bahari" narrative.

With SIR being rolled out in West Bengal, and the state going to elections next year, chances are for a raised "Bohiragata" rhetoric.

The leaders that Tejashwi and Mamata are referring to in their rhetoric are part of a party that is leading the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government at the Centre, chosen by a majority mandate from the country's electors.

And, in Bihar and West Bengal, the NDA in the former state received about 45.5 per cent of the vote share, and the BJP in the latter got 38.7 per cent in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections.

Some analysts dub the regional rhetoric as an attempt to shift focus from performance records to existential stakes, creating a mobilisational advantage during heated campaign periods.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rajesh Q
As a Bihari, I understand Tejashwi's concern. When national parties dominate state politics, local issues often get ignored. But this "bahari" rhetoric feels like an excuse for poor governance record. Both sides need to focus on actual development work.
A
Arjun K
Interesting analysis! The article rightly points out that both leaders are using similar tactics despite different contexts. In a diverse country like India, we should celebrate our unity while respecting regional identities. This "outsider" politics only divides us.
S
Sarah B
The hypocrisy is clear when TMC itself has MPs from outside Bengal. If the law allows representation from any constituency, why create this artificial divide? This seems like pure political strategy rather than genuine concern for states' rights.
V
Vikram M
In Bihar, we've seen both RJD and BJP governments. The "bahari" debate is just noise - what matters is who delivers better roads, electricity, and employment opportunities. Let performance speak, not political slogans! 🗳️
M
Michael C
As someone who has lived in both Bihar and West Bengal, I find this rhetoric concerning. India is one country - we should be able to work anywhere without being labeled "outsiders". This kind of politics goes against the spirit of our Constitution.
N
Nisha Z

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50