Viksit Bharat Bill Passed Amid Opposition Fury: Autocracy or Reform?

The Lok Sabha passed the Viksit Bharat Bill, which overhauls the rural jobs guarantee scheme. Union Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal defended the move as a natural evolution of welfare programs. Opposition parties erupted in protest, accusing the government of pushing the bill through without proper discussion. They labeled the approach as autocratic and criticized the removal of Mahatma Gandhi's name from the scheme.

Key Points: Arjun Ram Meghwal Defends Viksit Bharat Bill as Opposition Cries Foul

  • Union Minister asserts reforms are routine, citing similar past actions by opposition parties
  • Bill guarantees 125 days of wage employment, replacing the MGNREGA scheme
  • Opposition MPs allege a dictatorial approach, citing lack of committee referral
  • Congress MP criticizes removal of Mahatma Gandhi's name from the rural jobs scheme
3 min read

Arjun Ram Meghwal defends G RAM-G Bill as Oppn cries 'autocracy'

Union Minister defends the Viksit Bharat Bill, citing reforms as natural. Opposition alleges autocracy, criticizing the bill's passage without proper debate.

"This is not how a Bill should be passed, and this is not how democracy functions. - Rashtriya Janata Dal MP Manoj Kumar Jha"

New Delhi, Dec 19

After the Lok Sabha passed the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Bill, 2025 (VB–G RAM G Bill), Union Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal, on Friday, backed the government, asserting that improvements and reforms are a natural part of every welfare scheme, adding that similar changes were made even when the opposition parties were in power.

However, the passage of the Bill triggered sharp criticism from the Opposition, which alleged that the legislation was pushed through without proper discussion and accused the union government of adopting a 'dictatorial' approach.

Speaking to IANS, Union Minister Meghwal said that employment schemes existed even before the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) and that changing the name of a scheme does not alter its core objective.

"The Prime Minister has directed that the number of works under these schemes be increased, with greater emphasis on rural infrastructure, water conservation, and security-related planning," he added.

He also explained that disaster management in rural areas would also be strengthened under the revised framework.

"When disasters occur, work in villages must be properly planned and executed. Technology is being used extensively, and changes are being introduced across schemes to suit present-day requirements. Improvements happen in every scheme, and the same was done when the Opposition was in power," Union Minister Meghwal said.

Rashtriya Janata Dal MP Manoj Kumar Jha, however, criticised the manner in which the Bill was passed.

"This is not how a Bill should be passed, and this is not how democracy functions. Even during the farm laws, the Union government did not listen to us. We were helpless, and the Bills were pushed through unilaterally," he said.

Congress MP Mallu Ravi echoed similar concerns, saying that the Congress and INDIA Bloc allies held strong protests against the Bill.

"Our request was to refer the Bill to the Standing Committee or a Parliamentary Committee. The government ignored this demand and passed it solely on the strength of its majority. This shows a lack of respect for the Opposition. It reflects a dictatorial kind of rule prevailing in the country," he alleged.

Congress MP Jothimani Sennimalai also criticised the Union government, accusing Bharatiya Janata Party MPs of repeatedly breaching parliamentary privilege.

"Every day, BJP leaders like Nishikant Dubey and others violate parliamentary decorum. Even the Home Minister (Amit Shah) has used language that does not befit the dignity of Parliament," she said.

She also added that the Union government was undermining the right to work under MGNREGA by removing Mahatma Gandhi's name from the scheme.

"Mahatma Gandhi -- the Father of the Nation -- is revered not only in India but across the world. We are elected by the people to protect their rights and uphold Gandhian ideology. We protested against this Bill, and we are proud that we stood up for the people who elected us," Sennimalai said.

Meanwhile on Thursday, the Lok Sabha passed the VB-G RAM-G Bill via a voice vote.

The legislation, which replaces the MGNREGA with an enhanced guarantee of 125 days of wage employment annually for rural households, was cleared despite demands for further scrutiny.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
The opposition has a valid point about the process. Passing such a major bill without proper discussion in committee sets a dangerous precedent for our democracy. The government should have shown more respect for parliamentary norms.
A
Aman W
My father worked under MGNREGA for years. The payments were often delayed. If this new bill uses more technology to ensure timely wages and better projects like water conservation, I'm all for it. Action matters more than the name.
S
Sarah B
As an observer, the removal of Mahatma Gandhi's name seems symbolic but significant. It's not just a rebranding; it feels like an erasure of a certain ideological legacy connected to rural empowerment. The opposition's emotional connect to this is understandable.
K
Karthik V
The bill focuses on rural infrastructure and disaster management - both are crucial for villages. If the old scheme needed an upgrade for present-day requirements, so be it. Let's hope the 'Viksit Bharat' guarantee is delivered on the ground. 🙏
M
Manoj Q
Voice vote? Again? After the farm laws fiasco, one would hope the government learns to build consensus. A strong majority doesn't mean you ignore the other side completely. This 'my way or highway' attitude is worrying for the health of our Lok Sabha.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50