Key Points

Aniruddhacharya Maharaj has accused the media of distorting his remarks on women's attire and marriage. The seer claims his statements were meant for both genders but were selectively reported. He defended his use of rural dialects, saying phrases like 'mooh maarna' weren't gender-specific insults. The clarification follows widespread criticism from activists over his earlier comments about modern women.

Key Points: Aniruddhacharya Maharaj Claims Media Distorted His Remarks on Women

  • Aniruddhacharya accuses media of selective reporting on his remarks
  • Defends rural dialect usage in controversial statements
  • Advocates for discipline in youth regardless of gender
  • Faces backlash from women's rights groups over earlier comments
2 min read

Aniruddhacharya Maharaj clarifies controversial remarks, says 'media showed only half the story'

Controversial seer Aniruddhacharya Maharaj alleges media misrepresented his comments on marriage and attire, sparking social media backlash.

Aniruddhacharya Maharaj clarifies controversial remarks, says 'media showed only half the story'
"I made my statement equally for both boys and girls, but the media only highlighted the part related to girls - Aniruddhacharya Maharaj"

New Delhi, Aug 7

Aniruddhacharya Maharaj, who recently sparked controversy over his comments on women's attire and the age of marriage, has issued a clarification.

Speaking to IANS in Mathura, he alleged that his statement was misrepresented and only partially shown, leading to public outrage.

Aniruddhacharya expressed strong displeasure with the media, accusing them of broadcasting an incomplete and distorted version of his comments.

“I made my statement equally for both boys and girls, but the media only highlighted the part related to girls, which caused misunderstanding,” he said.

He further explained that expressions like “mooh maarna” (loosely translated as “loose character”) were taken from rural dialects and were not meant to insult anyone.

“In villages, people speak very directly. When someone, man or woman, has multiple relationships, it is commonly referred to as ‘char jagah mooh maarna’ (being unfaithful). This wasn’t meant to target any gender specifically,” he added.

Addressing the outrage on social media, Aniruddhacharya defended his views, saying there is nothing wrong with advising today’s youth to be disciplined and virtuous.

“If we teach our daughters and sons to be loyal and maintain character, how is that the wrong direction? Should we then promote characterlessness?” he asked.

“Whether a girl or a boy, both should be virtuous. What do parents teach their children? Sons should avoid theft and bad company. We have also taught the same, that sons should not look at other women, and daughters should not look at other men. Be happy with your own wife and husband...,” he said. “My goal is to spread awareness in society, not to hurt anyone’s sentiments,” he added.

His clarification comes days after his comments that "girls used to get married at 14 and blended into families, but now 25-year-olds come after ‘roaming around with multiple men..” sparked outrage among women's rights organisations and activists.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rajesh Q
Actually, Maharaj ji has a point about media twisting statements. Our TV channels always look for TRP by creating controversies. The core message about family values is important in today's westernized culture. But he should choose words carefully.
A
Aditya G
Why are we still discussing marriage age in 2023? Focus should be on education and financial independence for both boys and girls. These outdated views won't help our youth compete globally. #ModernIndia
S
Sarah B
As an expat in India, I find this debate fascinating. The generational clash is visible - older folks want to preserve traditions while youth want freedom. But language matters! Using phrases like "mooh maarna" is never okay, rural or urban.
K
Karthik V
Media is definitely guilty of selective reporting, but Maharaj shouldn't have used such language. We need balanced discussions - yes to moral values, no to regressive stereotypes. Also, 14-year-old brides? Seriously? That's child marriage, not tradition!
N
Nisha Z
My grandmother got married at 14 and had 7 children by 25. She says it was the worst time of her life. Why glorify this? Today's women are educated, working and marrying when ready. That's progress, not "characterlessness"! 🙏
M
Michael C

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50