Key Points

BJP IT cell chief Amit Malviya has strongly criticized former Chief Election Commissioner S.Y. Quraishi for his comments on Nepal's political situation. Malviya called Quraishi's description of Nepal's unrest as "vibrant democracy" rather than anarchy "absolutely shocking." He raised serious questions about Quraishi's tenure as Election Commissioner, alleging connections to organizations linked to George Soros. The BJP leader also questioned why proper voter list revisions weren't conducted during Quraishi's time in office.

Key Points: Amit Malviya Slams Ex-CEC Quraishi Nepal Democracy Remark

  • Malviya questions Quraishi's Nepal unrest comment as "vibrant democracy" not anarchy
  • Alleges EC-IFES MoU signed during Quraishi's tenure with Soros links
  • References 2007 UP election complaint about bogus voters from "big leader"
  • Criticizes failure to order Special Intensive Revision of voter lists
2 min read

Amit Malviya criticises former CEC Quraishi for terming Nepal unrest 'vibrant democracy'

BJP's Malviya attacks former CEC Quraishi for calling Nepal unrest "vibrant democracy," questions his EC tenure and alleged Congress links.

"Absolutely shocking! Former CEC S.Y. Quraishi calls the recent developments in Nepal a sign of ‘vibrant democracy’ -- not anarchy. - Amit Malviya"

New Delhi, Sep 16

BJP IT cell chief Amit Malviya has hit out at former Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) S.Y. Quraishi for describing the Nepal unrest as a sign of a “vibrant democracy” rather than anarchy.

“Absolutely shocking! Former CEC S.Y. Quraishi calls the recent developments in Nepal a sign of ‘vibrant democracy’ -- not anarchy. But given his record, this reckless comment is hardly surprising,” Malviya posted on X on Tuesday.

The BJP leader shared two videos on his handle -- one on the Nepal situation and another on electoral reforms.

Malviya alleged that during Quraishi’s tenure, the Election Commission of India signed an MoU with the International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES), “an outfit linked to George Soros’ Open Society Foundation, a known deep state operator and close associate of the Congress party and the Gandhis.”

He further claimed that Quraishi himself admitted that after the 2007 UP Assembly elections, a “big leader” had complained to him, saying: “You did not allow our bogus voters to vote.”

“At the time, Quraishi was one of the Election Commissioners, and the Samajwadi Party -- notorious for its Muslim appeasement politics -- was in power but lost the election,” Malviya said.

“If Quraishi knew this, why did he shield the leader all these years? Was the SP indulging in vote chori? Who was this leader?” he questioned.

Malviya questioned why, despite being EC (2006-2010) and later CEC (2010-2012), Quraishi never ordered a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter lists. “It was his constitutional duty to act!” he said.

He added that neither Quraishi nor his successors -- including Ashok Lavasa and O. P. Rawat -- initiated an SIR after 2003.

“And yet, these very people are now the media’s go-to critics of the current SIR,” Malviya quipped.

Malviya also contrasted the appointment system for Election Commissioners. “Earlier, the Prime Minister alone appointed the CEC. Today, a three-member panel, including the Leader of the Opposition, makes the decision. The old guard owed its posts entirely to the Congress system, and it shows.”

“Contesting ideas are welcome,” Malviya said, “but accountability must begin with those who had the chance -- and did nothing.”

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Nepal's internal matters should be left to Nepal. But Quraishi's comments do raise questions about his judgment. Calling violence "vibrant democracy" is concerning indeed.
A
Aditya G
The revelation about bogus voters in UP is shocking! If this was known to EC officials, why wasn't action taken? This shows how the system was compromised earlier.
S
Sarah B
While I appreciate holding former officials accountable, I wish our political discourse could be more constructive. Both sides need to focus on improving electoral systems rather than just attacking each other.
V
Vikram M
The three-member panel for EC appointments is definitely more transparent than the old system. At least now there's some check and balance instead of unilateral decisions.
N
Nikhil C
George Soros connection? That's serious if true! Foreign interference in our electoral process cannot be tolerated. Need proper investigation into this.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50